Table 6 Average AI of tensors over all pairs of datasets used in T1_normalized, FA_normalized, and hFA_normalized.

Brain Region	FA_normalized		T1_normalized		hFA_normalized		F	P	P1	P2	P3
Brain Region	mean	STD	mean	STD	mean	STD	F	P	P1	P2	P3
ALIC	0.687	0.355	0.733	0.459	0.774	0.264	34.240	<10⁻¹⁰	0.042	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰
CG	0.993	0.344	1.110	0.298	1.145	0.763	96.273	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰
EC	1.001	0.414	1.081	0.341	1.342	0.783	100.863	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰
fornix	0.869	0.874	0.960	0.288	1.356	0.234	176.524	<10⁻¹⁰	0.029	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰
GCC	1.082	0.267	1.110	0.357	1.225	0.675	2.987	0.078	—	—	—
PLIC	1.002	0.743	1.079	0.366	1.385	0.273	20.739	<10⁻¹⁰	0.001	0.004	<10⁻¹⁰
SCC	1.040	0.566	1.056	0.325	1.198	0.637	78.724	<10⁻¹⁰	0.199	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰
CST	0.996	0.757	1.180	0.301	1.302	0.845	34.572	<10⁻¹⁰	0.038	<10⁻¹⁰	<10⁻¹⁰
SLF	0.809	0.265	0.883	0.496	0.893	0.261	1.547	0.221	—	—	—
IFOF	1.044	0.684	1.118	0.331	1.188	0.632	2.889	0.095	—	—	—

ALIC: anterior limb of the internal capsule, CG: cingulum, EC: external capsule, fornix, GCC: genu of the corpus callosum, PLIC: posterior limb of the internal capsule, SCC: splenium of the corpus callosum, CST: corticospinal tract, SLF: superior longitudinal fascicle, IFOF: inferior fronto-occipital fasiculus. AI: angle of primary eigenvectors. ANOVA was used to compare the difference between the three diffusion tensor templates. P1: Statistically significant differences between hFA_template and T1_normalized (after correction for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni approach). P2: Statistically significant differences between T1_normalized and hFA_normalized (after correction for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni approach). P3: Statistically significant differences between FA_normalized and hFA_normalized (after correction for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni approac.

Quick links

Search