Table 2 Electrochemical performance comparison of FLTO/C with other LTO composites materials and graphite materials.
Materials | Current Rate (C) | Rate capacity (mAh g-1) | Current rate for cycling (C) | Cycle number | Capacity retention (%) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFLTO | 10 | 76.0 | 5 | 150 | 99.6 | |
Li4Ti4.95Te0.05O12 | 10 | 120.3 | 5 | 100 | 98.2 | |
B0.3-C@Li4Ti5O12 | 1 | 165.0 | 1 | 200 | 90.0 | |
LTO-Ce | 10 | 61.5 | 2 | 400 | 81.7 | |
LTO-Ti | 10 | 131.0 | 2 | 200 | 97.8 | |
SGG | 10 | 390.0 | 0.8 | 600 | 92.0 | |
GGCC | 10 | 478.8 | 0.5 | 325 | 86.9 | |
FLTO/C | 10 | 153.8 | 5 | 1000 | 92.6 | Our work |