Table 6 Association between the different frailty grades and psychological resilience in HD participants(n = 408).

From: Prevalence and risk factors of pre-frailty and frailty in hemodialysis patients in central China

Variable

Model1

Model2

Model3

Model4

OR (95%CI)a

OR (95%CI)b

OR (95%CI)a

OR (95%CI)b

OR (95%CI)a

OR (95%CI)b

OR (95%CI)a

OR (95%CI)b

Psychological resilience(scores)

0.96 (0.92 ~ 0.99)**

0.94 (0.91 ~ 0.97)***

0.95 (0.92 ~ 0.99)**

0.94 (0.91 ~ 0.97)***

0.95 (0.92 ~ 0.99)*

0.95 (0.91 ~ 0.98)**

0.96 (0.92 ~ 1.00)*

0.96 (0.92 ~ 0.99)*

Psychological resilience.q3(scores)

        

≤ 19

1 (Ref)

1 (Ref)

1 (Ref)

1 (Ref)

1 (Ref)

1 (Ref)

1 (Ref)

1 (Ref)

20–28

0.22 (0.09 ~ 0.51)***

0.21 (0.10 ~ 0.47)***

0.21 (0.09 ~ 0.48)***

0.22 (0.10 ~ 0.50)***

0.22 (0.09 ~ 0.52)***

0.28 (0.12 ~ 0.65)**

0.23 (0.10 ~ 0.56)***

0.34 (0.14 ~ 0.81)*

≥29

0.17 (0.07 ~ 0.41)***

0.15 (0.07 ~ 0.34)***

0.16 (0.07 ~ 0.39)***

0.15 (0.07 ~ 0.35)***

0.16 (0.06 ~ 0.40)***

0.18 (0.07 ~ 0.43)***

0.18 (0.07 ~ 0.46)***

0.21 (0.08 ~ 0.54)***

Trend.test

0.52 (0.36 ~ 0.74)***

0.48 (0.34 ~ 0.67)***

0.50 (0.34 ~ 0.72)***

0.48 (0.34 ~ 0.67)***

0.47 (0.31 ~ 0.71)***

0.49 (0.33 ~ 0.72)***

0.49 (0.32 ~ 0.75)***

0.53 (0.35 ~ 0.80)**

  1. aPre-frailty VS robust; bFrailty VS robust.
  2. *p < 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p  ≤ 0.001.
  3. Model1: Non-adjusted; Model2: adjested sex + age; Model3: adjested sex + age + monthly household income + education level + smoking status + drinking status + with children + falls + vascular access + exercise; Model4: adjested sex + age + monthly household income + education level + smoking status + drinking status + with children + falls + vascular access + exercise + diabetes + heart disease + cerebral disease.