Fig. 3 | Scientific Reports

Fig. 3

From: Longitudinal comparative study on osteogenic capacity using two collagenated xenografts in artificial bone defects in beagles

Fig. 3

Micro-computed tomography (CT) analysis in the 24-week group. (A) Micro-CT three-dimensional reconstructed images of the defect site and volume of interest (VOI). The VOI was defined as a 3 × 3 × 3 mm cube surrounding the implant within the bone defect. (B) Comparison of bone mineral density between groups. (C) Comparison of bone volume/total volume between groups. (D) Bone-to-implant contact and region of interest (ROI). The ROI was defined as a 200 μm zone extending from the implant surface. (E) Osseointegration (%): percentage of new bone contact with the implant surface, indicating comparable osseointegration in both graft groups.

Back to article page