Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Multimodal in situ X-ray mechanistic studies of a bimetallic oxide electrocatalyst in alkaline media

Abstract

Co–Mn spinel oxide is a promising next-generation electrocatalyst that has previously shown oxygen reduction reaction activity that rivals that of Pt in alkaline fuel cells. Although the performance is encouraging, understanding the catalytic mechanisms in the oxygen reduction reaction is critical to advancing and enabling low-cost alkaline fuel cell technology. Here we use multimodal in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction and resonant elastic X-ray scattering to investigate the interplay between the structure and oxidation state of a Co–Mn spinel oxide electrocatalyst. We show that the Co–Mn spinel oxide electrocatalyst exhibits a kinetically limited cubic-to-tetragonal phase transition, which is correlated to a reduction in both the Co and Mn valence states. Additionally, the electrocatalyst exhibits a reversible and rapid increase in tensile strain at low potentials during cyclic voltammetry, and joint density-functional theory is used to provide insight into how reactive adsorbates induce strain in spinel oxide nanoparticles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: In situ XRD and REXS.
Fig. 2: Reversible strain changes of Co–Mn spinel oxides during CV.
Fig. 3: Partially reversible phase transformation in MnCo2O4 under extreme ORR conditions.
Fig. 4: Phase-specific spectroscopic changes during potentiostatic measurements.
Fig. 5: Crystal structures and simulated REXS spectra of the phase transition.
Fig. 6: Modelled strain due to surface adsorbates.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this work are available in the Article and its Supplementary Information or from the authors upon request.

References

  1. Debe, M. K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature 486, 43–51 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gasteiger, H. A., Kocha, S. S., Sompalli, B. & Wagner, F. T. Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-Alloy and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl. Catal. B 56, 9–35 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xiong, Y., Yang, Y., Disalvo, F. J. & Abruña, H. D. Pt-decorated composition-tunable Pd-Fe@Pd/C core-shell nanoparticles with enhanced electrocatalytic activity toward the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 7248–7255 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, G. et al. Pt skin on AuCu intermetallic substrate: a strategy to maximize Pt utilization for fuel cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9643–9649 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, D. et al. Structurally ordered intermetallic platinum–cobalt core–shell nanoparticles with enhanced activity and stability as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Mater. 12, 81–87 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shao, M., Chang, Q., Dodelet, J. P. & Chenitz, R. Recent advances in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev. 116, 3594–3657 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ge, X. et al. Oxygen reduction in alkaline media: from mechanisms to recent advances of catalysts. ACS Catal. 5, 4643–4667 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, Y. et al. Octahedral spinel electrocatalysts for alkaline fuel cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24425–24432 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Y. et al. Synergistic Mn-Co catalyst outperforms Pt on high-rate oxygen reduction for alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1506 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Y. et al. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy of a synergistic Co-Mn oxide catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 1463–1466 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martens, I. et al. Probing the dynamics of platinum surface oxides in fuel cell catalyst layers using in situ X-ray diffraction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 7772–7780 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chattot, R. et al. Disclosing Pt-bimetallic alloy nanoparticle surface lattice distortion with electrochemical probes. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 162–169 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chattot, R. et al. Electrochemical strain dynamics in noble metal nanocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 17068–17078 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stragier, H. et al. Diffraction anomalous fine structure: a new X-ray structural technique. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3064–3067 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawaguchi, T. et al. Roles of transition metals interchanging with lithium in electrode materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 14064–14070 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Komatsu, H. et al. Site-selective analysis of nickel-substituted Li-rich layered material: migration and role of transition metal at charging and discharging. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 20099–20107 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstock, D. et al. Structure-selective operando X-ray spectroscopy. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 261–266 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, Y. et al. A review on performance degradation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells during startup and shutdown processes: causes, consequences and mitigation strategies. J. Power Sources 205, 10–23 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Warren, B. E. X-Ray Diffraction (Dover Publications, 1990).

  20. Bunǎu, O. & Joly, Y. Self-consistent aspects of X-ray absorption calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 345501 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guda, S. A. et al. Optimized finite difference method for the full-potential XANES simulations: application to molecular adsorption geometries in MOFs and metal-ligand intersystem crossing transients. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 4512–4521 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bourke, J. D., Chantler, C. T. & Joly, Y. FDMX: extended X-ray absorption fine structure calculations using the finite difference method. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 23, 551–559 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bundschu, C. R. et al. Oxygen reduction pathway for spinel metal oxides in alkaline media: an experimentally supported ab initio study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 4680–4686 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hancock, D. Y. et al. Jetstream2: accelerating cloud computing via Jetstream. In Proc. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series PEARC 2021: Evolution Across All Dimensions (eds Paris, J. et al.) 1–8 (ACM, 2021).

  25. Boerner, T. J., Deems, S., Furlani, T. R., Knuth, S. L. & Towns, J. ACCESS: advancing innovation: NSF’s advanced cyberinfrastructure coordination ecosystem: services and support. In Proc. PEARC 2023: Computing for the Common Good (eds Sinkovits, R. et al.) 173–176 (ACM, 2023).

  26. Newnham, R. E. Properties of Materials (Oxford Univ. Press, 2005).

  27. Zhang, Z., Koppensteiner, J., Schranz, W. & Carpenter, M. A. Variations in elastic and anelastic properties of Co3O4 due to magnetic and spin-state transitions. Am. Mineral. 97, 399–406 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meena, P. L., Kumar, R. & Sreenivas, K. Structural, elastic and magnetic properties of spinel Co3O4. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 56, 890–895 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., DeWolf, J. T. & Mazurek, D. F. Mechanics of Materials 6th edn (McGraw-Hill, 2012).

  30. Yang, E. et al. Origin of unusual spinel-to-layered phase transformation by crystal water. Chem. Sci. 9, 433–438 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wojtowicz, P. J. Theoretical model for tetragonal-to-cubic phase transformations in transition metal spinels. Phys. Rev. 116, 32 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kieffer, J., Valls, V., Blanc, N. & Hennig, C. New tools for calibrating diffraction setups. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 27, 558–566 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Vugrin, K. W., Swiler, L. P., Roberts, R. M., Stucky-Mack, N. J. & Sullivan, S. P. Confidence region estimation techniques for nonlinear regression in groundwater flow: three case studies. Water Resour. Res. 43, 3423 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Solé, V. A., Papillon, E., Cotte, M., Walter, P. & Susini, J. A multiplatform code for the analysis of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra. Spectrochim. Acta B Spectrosc. 62, 63–68 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was primarily supported as part of the Center for Alkaline Based Energy Solutions (CABES), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), under award no. DE-SC0019445. This work is based on research conducted at the Center for High-Energy X-ray Sciences (CHEXS), which is supported by the National Science Foundation (BIO, ENG and MPS Directorates) under award no. DMR-1829070. Research conducted at the Center for High-Energy X-ray Science (CHEXS) was supported by the National Science Foundation (BIO, ENG and MPS Directorates) under awards DMR-1829070 and DMR-2342336. This work used CPU and Large Memory nodes at Indiana Jetstream2 through allocation CHE240012 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS) program, which is supported by National Science Foundation grants #2138259, #2138286, #2138307, #2137603 and #2138296.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.S., H.D.A., Y.Y. and D.W. conceived the idea. A.S., J.J.H., D.W., Y.Y., S.S. and J.P.C.R. designed and conducted the X-ray experiments. Y.Y., Q.L. and J.J.H. prepared and ran the in situ electrochemical cell. Y.Y. synthesized Co–Mn spinel oxide catalysts. J.J.H., D.W. and A.S. processed and analysed the X-ray and electrochemical data. C.R.B. and T.A.A. carried out the JDFT calculations. J.J.H. conducted the strain modelling and REXS simulations. J.J.H., Y.Y., C.R.B. and A.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors, with the exception of D.W., reviewed the manuscript. D.W. passed away prior to the writing of the manuscript, but is credited due to his substantial contributions to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Héctor D. Abruña or Andrej Singer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Catalysis thanks Yvonne Grunder, Zhaolin Liu, Sheng Sun and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–11 and Notes 1–4.

Supplementary Data 1

JDFT atomic position data for Co3O4.

Supplementary Data 2

JDFT atomic position data for Co2MnO4.

Supplementary Data 3

JDFT atomic position data for Co2xMnO4.

Supplementary Data 4

JDFT atomic position data for CoMnCoO4.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J.J., Yang, Y., Weinstock, D. et al. Multimodal in situ X-ray mechanistic studies of a bimetallic oxide electrocatalyst in alkaline media. Nat Catal 8, 116–125 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-025-01289-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-025-01289-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing