Advanced search

Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–13 of 13 results
Advanced filters: Author: Colin Camerer Clear advanced filters

  • Camerer et al. use standardized experiments across thousands of students to demonstrate empirical regularities in two-person bargaining and trading in markets. Bargaining outcomes lean toward equal sharing, and markets rapidly create prices that match supply and demand.

    • Po-Hsuan Lin
    • Alexander L. Brown
    • Colin F. Camerer
    Research
    Nature Human Behaviour
    Volume: 4, P: 917-927

  • This study finds that decision markets can be a useful tool for selecting studies for replication. For a sample of 26 online experiments published in PNAS selected by a decision market, the authors find replication rates ranging between 54% and 62%.

    • Felix Holzmeister
    • Magnus Johannesson
    • Anna Dreber
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Human Behaviour
    Volume: 9, P: 316-330

  • Jurors can be influenced by mitigating circumstances when deciding on sentences for committed crimes. Yamadaet al. show that feelings of sympathy created by mitigating circumstances activate moral conflict regions of the brain that predict individual differences in the severity of the sentence.

    • Makiko Yamada
    • Colin F. Camerer
    • Hidehiko Takahashi
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Communications
    Volume: 3, P: 1-6

  • The results obtained by seventy different teams analysing the same functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset show substantial variation, highlighting the influence of analytical choices and the importance of sharing workflows publicly and performing multiple analyses.

    • Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
    • Felix Holzmeister
    • Tom Schonberg
    Research
    Nature
    Volume: 582, P: 84-88

  • Social science hypotheses suggest that humans prefer more equality in outcome distributions because the knowledge of inequality reduces the reward experience. Here, functional MRI was used to test directly for inequality-averse social preferences in the brain during monetary transfers between pairs of participants and an experimenter. The results indicate that the brain's reward circuitry is sensitive to distribution inequality and is actively modulated relative to context.

    • Elizabeth Tricomi
    • Antonio Rangel
    • John P. O’Doherty
    Research
    Nature
    Volume: 463, P: 1089-1091

  • A massive field study whereby many different treatments are tested synchronously in one large sample using a common objectively measured outcome, termed a megastudy, was performed to examine the ability of interventions to increase gym attendance by American adults.

    • Katherine L. Milkman
    • Dena Gromet
    • Angela L. Duckworth
    Research
    Nature
    Volume: 600, P: 478-483

  • We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.

    • Daniel J. Benjamin
    • James O. Berger
    • Valen E. Johnson
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Human Behaviour
    Volume: 2, P: 6-10

  • The past decade has seen an increasing interest in the mechanisms by which the human brain decides what actions to take. Here, Rangel and colleagues provide a framework for the exploration of the neurobiological and computational basis of value-based decision making.

    • Antonio Rangel
    • Colin Camerer
    • P. Read Montague
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience
    Volume: 9, P: 545-556