Standard treatment for symptomatic myelofibrosis (MF) patients includes JAK inhibitors (JAKi) like ruxolitinib and fedratinib [1,2,3,4], but their effectiveness is often limited by transient responses and the development of cytopenias [5]. Recently, momelotinib received FDA and EMA approval for treating splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms in adult patients with MF and anemia. In addition to JAK1/JAK2 inhibition, momelotinib targets the activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1), which regulates iron metabolism through hepcidin, contributing to its unique therapeutic profile [6]. The efficacy of momelotinib in improving symptoms, reducing spleen size, increasing hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and reducing transfusion dependency in both JAKi naïve and JAKi exposed MF patients has been demonstrated in several clinical trials [7,8,9,10,11].
Given its recent approval, real-world data on momelotinib use is still limited. To gather evidence on its efficacy and safety in routine practice, the Spanish Group of Philadelphia-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (GEMFIN) initiated the MOMGEMFIN study, analyzing MF patients treated with momelotinib through a managed access program.
This study was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of adult patients treated with momelotinib (JAK-naïve or JAK-exposed) from March 2023 to July 2024. Eligible participants had primary or secondary MF with anemia and disease-related symptoms or symptomatic splenomegaly. Anemia was defined as Hb values less than 11 g/dL for men and less than 10 g/dL for women. Anemia response was based on the 2024 IWG-ELN criteria [12]. Transfusion dependency was classified as requiring at least one red blood cell (RBC) unit per month or three or more units over 12 weeks. Spleen evaluation followed the 2013 ELN (IWG-MRT) criteria [13]. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE version 5.0.
A total of 154 patients from 74 centers were included, with a median age of 73 years at momelotinib initiation (range 42–87). Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of these, 118 patients (76.6%) had prior exposure to a JAKi, most commonly ruxolitinib (117 patients, 99%), followed by fedratinib (4 patients) and pacritinib (1 patient). The ruxolitinib dose before discontinuation was ≤15 mg/12 h in 71% of patients, primarily due to cytopenias. The median duration of prior JAKi treatment was 16.8 months (range 0.4–128). Among these patients, 58.8% transitioned to momelotinib immediately or within 7 days of JAKi discontinuation, while the remaining 41.2% initiated treatment after a median interval of 2.75 months (range 0.3–41). The remaining 36 patients (23.4%) received momelotinib as their first JAKi.
A total of 77% of patients had prior exposure to erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs), and 11% had received danazol. At the time of momelotinib initiation, 16.2% of patients (25/154) had platelet counts <50 × 109/L. The starting momelotinib dose was 200 mg daily, except for 4 (2.6%) patients who started with 150 mg. Median follow up of the cohort was 5.05 months (range 1–14 months).
A total of 122 patients who met the 2024 IWG-ELN criteria for anemia [12] were assessed for anemia response. The median Hb level in this cohort was 8.0 g/dL (range 4.7–10.8 g/dL). Among these patients, 73.8% met the criteria for transfusion dependency.
In the Transfusion Dependent Anemia (TDA) group, the median Hb level prior to initiating momelotinib was 7.7 g/dL (range 4.7–9.8), and the median RBC transfusion frequency was 4 units per month [range 1–8] (Table 2 and Fig. 1). At 3 months of follow-up, 26.9% of patients achieved a major response, while 31.3% achieved a minor response. The median Hb increased from 7.7 to 8.7 g/dL. At 6 months, the proportions of patients with major and minor responses slightly increased to 30.6% and 36.1%, respectively. The median RBC transfusion frequency in the TDA cohort decreased from 4 to 1 unit at both 3 and 6 months. In the subanalysis by prior JAKi exposure, the overall response rates (ORR; major + minor) were 60% in JAKi-exposed patients (with 10.9% of patients unavailable) compared to 50% in JAKi-naïve patients at 3 months, and 67.8% (10.7% unavailable) vs. 62.5% at 6 months, respectively. Among TDA patients, 48.4% achieved transfusion independence at 3 months and 45.7% at 6 months.
Patients with prior JAK inhibitor exposure are shown in red, naive patients are depicted in green. *The analysis included patients with anemia per the 2024 IWG-ELN criteria who had at least one month of follow-up for response evaluation. m: months, TDA: Transfusion-Dependent Anemia, JAKi: Janus Kinase Inhibitor.
In the Non-TDA group, the median Hb level prior to momelotinib initiation was 8.9 g/dL (range 7.2–10.8). At 3 months, 47.8% of patients achieved a major response, while 8.7% achieved a minor response. At 6 months, the proportions of patients with major and minor responses were 36.4% and 27.3%, respectively. The median Hb increased from 8.9 to 10.2 g/dL at 3 months and remained 10.1 g/dL at 6 months. In the subanalysis by prior JAKi exposure, the ORR at 3 months were 70.6% in JAKi-exposed patients compared to 16.6% in JAKi-naïve patients, and 85.7% vs. 25% at 6 months, respectively. The previous toxicity associated with prior JAK inhibitors in the exposed group may help explain these results.
Out of 122 patients, 72 (59%) received momelotinib in combination with other anemia-directed therapies—71 with ESA and 2 with danazol (one received both ESA plus danazol). Notably, 89% of these patients had been on ESA or danazol for varying durations before starting momelotinib, typically alongside prior JAKi treatment. Additionally, 45 patients were treated with momelotinib alone, while data on concomitant treatment was missing for 5 patients. At the 3-month follow-up, the overall response rate (major + minor) was 71.5% in the combination treatment group and 50% in the monotherapy group (p = 0.04) (Table S1). However, this difference was not sustained at 6 months (68% vs. 70.6%). While these data suggest that combination therapy may lead to earlier responses, further controlled studies are needed to confirm this finding.
A total of 45 patients with splenomegaly > 5 cm at baseline were assessed for spleen response (Table S2); their median spleen size was 10 cm (range 5–25). Among them, 28 patients (62.2%) showed spleen size reduction, with a median decrease of 5 cm (range 2–15 cm). According to the 2013 ELN (IWG-MRT) criteria, 24.4% qualified for spleen response, achieving a median reduction of 10 cm (range 6–15 cm). Subgroup analysis indicated similar response rates for JAKi-exposed (61.8%) and JAKi-naïve (63.6%) patients, although the median spleen size reduction was greater in the JAKi-naïve group (median 12 cm) compared to the JAKi-exposed group (median 8 cm).
For symptom response analysis (Table S3 and Fig. S1), 94% of the 134 patients had disease-related symptoms at baseline. Among these, 92% demonstrated sustained improvement, with notable reductions in asthenia (76%), anorexia (65%), weight loss (51%), abdominal discomfort (47%), and pruritus (75%).
Regarding safety (Fig. S2), thrombocytopenia was the most common hematological AE (10.3% of patients, 6.2% grade 3–4). Other hematological AEs included anemia (4.8%) and neutropenia (1.4%). Although thrombocytopenia was the most common hematological adverse event, median platelet counts remained stable at 3, 6, and 9 months, with no significant reduction compared to baseline, even in patients with platelet counts <100 × 109/L and <50 × 109/L. Most frequent extra-hematological AEs were diarrhea (11.7%), infections (9%), and hepatotoxicity (5.6%). A total of 26 patients (17%) required dose reductions, and 10 patients needed temporary treatment discontinuation due to AEs. Six patients discontinued treatment permanently due to toxicity, including infections, diarrhea, nephritis, renal failure, and hypotension. At the last follow-up, 79% of patients continued treatment. Discontinuations were due to stem cell transplantation (3 patients), lack of efficacy (5 pts), progression (2), transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (5 pts), toxicity (6), and death (11).
This study presents the largest real-world cohort of MF patients treated with momelotinib and is the first to apply the recently proposed 2024 criteria for anemia response. The results are consistent with or exceed those from clinical trials regarding anemia and spleen responses. In the MOMENTUM trial [9], 27% of patients achieved transfusion independence at week 24, while our study reported a substantially higher rate of 45.7%. Similarly, the SIMPLIFY-2 trial [8] documented an increase in transfusion independence from 31% at baseline to 43% at week 24; in our cohort, these rates rose from 26.2% to 54.3%. Our results are also better than those recently reported in a series of 60 MF patients receiving momelotinib in routine clinical practice in Germany [14]. The differences in criteria used to evaluate transfusion independence and response across studies and the high rate of concurrent ESAs in our study, may contribute to the observed discrepancies in outcomes.
Spleen response according to the 2013 ELN (IWG-MRT) criteria [13] in our study, is consistent with MOMENTUM findings and significantly better than the 9% response rate in SIMPLIFY-2. Furthermore, our data indicate that the majority of symptomatic patients experienced a reduction in disease-related symptoms during treatment with momelotinib, with responses being sustained over time. Unlike clinical trials, these data were based on routine clinical evaluation, reflecting real-world practice but limiting comparison to standardized assessments.
The safety profile observed in our study was consistent with that reported in clinical trials, with diarrhea and infections as the most common non-hematological AEs. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 4.8% of patients (primarily grade 1–2), comparable to the 4% reported in the MOMENTUM trial [9], but significantly lower than the 13% and 11% rates observed in the SIMPLIFY-1 [7] and SIMPLIFY-2 [8], studies, respectively. Renal insufficiency was low, at 1.4% across all grades. The incidence of thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 was 6.2%, aligning with the SIMPLIFY studies (7%), and significantly lower than the 28% reported in the MOMENTUM trial [9]. Importantly, most patients with thrombocytopenia, maintained stable platelet counts during treatment. The discontinuation rate was low (4%), in contrast to 14% in SIMPLIFY-2 and 12% in MOMENTUM, potentially due to the shorter follow-up period of our cohort.
This study is limited by its retrospective design and short follow-up duration, which restricts our ability to assess the long-term sustainability of treatment responses. Nonetheless, our findings offer valuable real-world evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of momelotinib, complementing existing clinical trial data. Our results support that momelotinib is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for MF patients in routine clinical practice, demonstrating efficacy in both JAK-naïve and previously JAK-treated patients with cytopenias.
Data availability
The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.
References
Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Livingston RA, Hu W, Mascarenhas J. Ten years of treatment with ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis: a review of safety. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16:82.
Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Masszi T, Mishchenko E, Drummond M, Jourdan E, et al. Updated results of the placebo‐controlled, phase III JAKARTA trial of fedratinib in patients with intermediate‐2 or high‐risk myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2021;195:244–8.
Harrison CN, Mesa R, Talpaz M, Al-Ali HK, Xicoy B, Passamonti F, et al. Efficacy and safety of fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (FREEDOM2): results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11:e729–e740.
Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:801–21.
Gupta V, Cerquozzi S, Foltz L, Hillis C, Devlin R, Elsawy M, et al. Patterns of Ruxolitinib Therapy Failure and Its Management in Myelofibrosis: Perspectives of the Canadian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Group. JCO Oncol Pr. 2020;16:351–9.
Asshoff M, Petzer V, Warr MR, Haschka D, Tymoszuk P, Demetz E, et al. Momelotinib inhibits ACVR1/ALK2, decreases hepcidin production, and ameliorates anemia of chronic disease in rodents. Blood. 2017;129:1823–30.
Mesa RA, Kiladjian J-J, Catalano JV, Devos T, Egyed M, Hellmann A, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in Janus Kinase Inhibitor–Naïve Patients With Myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3844–50.
Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, Cervantes F, Gupta V, Lavie D, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e73–e81.
Verstovsek S, Gerds AT, Vannucchi AM, Al-Ali HK, Lavie D, Kuykendall AT, et al. Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2023;401:269–80.
Tefferi A, Pardanani A. Momelotinib for myelofibrosis: our 14 years of experience with 100 clinical trial patients and recent FDA approval. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14:47.
Verstovsek S, Mesa R, Gupta V, Lavie D, Dubruille V, Cambier N, et al. Momelotinib long-term safety and survival in myelofibrosis: integrated analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Blood Adv. 2023;7:3582–91.
Tefferi A, Barosi G, Passamonti F, Hernandez-Boluda J-C, Bose P, Döhner K, et al. Proposals for revised International Working Group–European LeukemiaNet criteria for anemia response in myelofibrosis. Blood. 2024;144:1813–20.
Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, Passamonti F, Verstovsek S, Vannucchi AM, et al. Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood. 2013;122:1395–8.
Jilg S, Schwaab J, Sockel K, Crodel CC, Brueckl V, Stegelmann F, et al. MoReLife – real-life data support the potential of momelotinib as a safe and effective treatment option for cytopenic myelofibrosis patients. Ann Hematol. 2024;103:4065–77.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank the patients and their families for their participation in this study, as well as the investigators and healthcare professionals involved in data collection and patient care. We extend our gratitude to the Data Science Unit at FIBioHRC and the Ramón y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS) for their invaluable support in generating the database and providing statistical analysis assistance. We also wish to express our gratitude to GSK for supplying momelotinib through the compassionate use program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VGG, LPL, ASD, and JCHB designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, analyzed and interpreted the results and wrote the paper. RGD, AAL, MAS, EM, MLF, IPG, GA, SGP, RPL, DMTC, AA, CAL, PLA, MV, JAVG, DDML, AFR, AMS, AHM, MTGC, RS, GCT, NLHR, BX, MPE, RMS, LNMB, FFM, NAS, CGR, PV, LLE, SM, ILK, ECL, AG, SMCR, FMDL, MJOMF, MLMM, TA, ECP, LALG, AMH, AT, EHP, MIMV, ICV, MJF, CA, MS, AGM, BNE, MAD, MPS, THS, MAMJ, JDV, WTJ, JAG, HATM, TCR, AAB, FP, MJLF, PBV, RP, FH, ECG, RJB, MGK, SGDV, MTTMR, MMC, BCR, MFS, SGP, RLP, ALV collected the data and approved the final version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
LPL: Novartis, Incyte and GSK; travel grants. GSK and Novartis speaker honoraria. AAL: honoraria fees for participating in advisory board from AOP and for lectures from Novartis and GSK. RJB: Novartis, GSK; speaker honoraria. VGG: Novartis; BMS; Incyte; Pfizer and GSK; travel grants, research funding, advisory board. ASD: Novartis; BMS; Incyte and Pfizer; travel grants. Novartis; research funding, advisory board. JCHB: advisory honoraria from Incyte, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS, and AOP Health; travel support from Incyte and Pfizer; speaker fees from GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and Incyte.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study received approval from the Ramón y Cajal Hospital Ethics Committee (code number 176/24) and the GEMFIN Scientific Committee, and adhered to ethical standards for medical research involving human subjects. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and other relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez-Lamas, L., Segura Diaz, A., García Delgado, R. et al. Real world outcomes of momelotinib in myelofibrosis patients with anemia: results from the MOMGEMFIN study. Blood Cancer J. 15, 67 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01275-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01275-z
This article is cited by
-
Momelotinib in JAK2 inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis: pros and cons
Blood Cancer Journal (2025)