Introduction

Noble gases (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe) are robust tracers of the origin of mantle-derived magmas and their study has played a pivotal role in understanding Earth accretion and evolution1,2,3. Intra-plate magmas originating from the lower mantle (e.g., many ocean island basalts or OIBs, and continental flood basalts) show elevated primordial to radiogenic/nucleogenic isotope ratios of He and Ne (i.e., high 3He/4He and low 21Ne/22Ne) compared to upper mantle magmas (mid-ocean ridge basalts or MORBs). These observations imply an origin in the relatively undegassed deep mantle, which is enriched in primordial volatiles1,2,3,4,5. Variations in 129Xe normalised to a non-radiogenic Xe isotope (e.g., 130Xe), where 129Xe is produced by radioactive decay of 129I within ~100 Myr of Earth formation, further point to separation between these lower and upper mantle sources early in Earth’s history3. The exact mechanism leading to the preservation of primordial noble gas signatures in the deep Earth remains contentious. Proposals range from storage in the core6,7,8, dense Fe-rich piles derived from magma ocean crystallisation9 or simply less processed mantle material10, perhaps combined with migration and storage of primordial noble gases into geochemically depleted mantle rocks11. Contributions from geochemically depleted and deeply subducted material to the sources of deep-mantle plumes is supported by combination of noble gas isotopes with other geochemical tracers, such as the radiogenic isotopes of lithophile elements (Sr, Nd, Hf, Pb) in several OIBs7,12,13,14.

The lack of convective homogenisation of primordial noble gases within Earth’s mantle makes He and Ne isotopes powerful tracers of the origin of magmas in the deep mantle1,2,3. For example, He isotope ratios substantially higher than the MORB value (3He/4He = 8 ± 1 × Ra where Ra indicates the atmospheric ratio of 1.384 × 10−61,15) support a deep mantle origin for continental magmas associated with large igneous provinces (LIPs)4,5,11. Neon isotopes in LIP magmas, although examined less frequently because their measurement is analytically more challenging due to low Ne concentrations, are less nucleogenic than MORBs. These results are consistent with a deep mantle contribution in the genesis of OIBs5,16,17. In some cases, deep-mantle Ne isotopic signatures do not coincide with high 3He/4He reflecting mixing with deeply subducted material18, upper convective mantle19,20 or sub-continental lithospheric mantle21,22.

Helium and Ne isotopes are ideal candidates to investigate the potential occurrence of deep and ancient material in the sources of magmas, including kimberlites, where such contributions are contentious (see below). Kimberlites are carbonate-rich magmas, which are considered to tap similar mantle sources as those of OIBs, based on overlapping Sr-Nd-Hf isotope compositions23,24. Simple petrological considerations, including the instability of carbonates in the deep lithosphere combined with the low degrees of melting ( <1%) to generate the observed elevated concentration of mantle-incompatible trace elements, firmly rule out an origin of these melts in the lithospheric mantle25. Being emplaced on the stable nuclei of continents (i.e. cratons) since at least 2 Ga26,27, kimberlites provide a complementary and temporally more extensive perspective on the origin of compositional variations in the convecting mantle than OIBs.

Geographic correspondence between the peripheral zones of large low-shearwave velocity provinces (LLSVPs) above the core-mantle boundary and the reconstructed ___location of the majority of Phanerozoic kimberlites at the time of eruption has previously been used as evidence to suggest a deep mantle origin for kimberlites28,29. In this context, the LLSVP margins represent the loci of mantle plume generation including the sources of several OIBs and LIPs30. This view is supported by the spatio-temporal association of some kimberlites with LIPs31. Additional models of kimberlite generation entail partial melting of upper convecting mantle sources in response to extensional tectonics32 or small-scale convection33. An upper mantle origin might be supported by temporal correspondence between kimberlite formation and episodes of supercontinent reorganisation27,32, hence underscoring that no single trigger of kimberlite magmatism exists25.

The geochemical record of kimberlites similarly includes inconclusive evidence supporting a deep and ancient, rather than shallow mantle origin of these magmas. Long-lived radiogenic isotope systems (87Rb/87Sr, 147Sm/143Nd, 176Lu/176Hf) indicate that the majority of kimberlites tap a long-lived ( >2 Ga) common mantle component that is equivalent to the PREMA (PREvalent MAntle) component documented in OIBs14 and is potentially, but not necessarily stored in the deep mantle23,34,35. The short-lived 182Hf-182W system seems to support a deep and/or ancient origin of kimberlites based on very small negative anomalies documented in some36, but not all kimberlites37. However, similar anomalies have so far not been detected in the short-lived 146Sm/142Nd system36,38. Previous analyses of He and Ne isotopes provide inconsistent and therefore inconclusive results with respect to the origin of kimberlites. While non-nucleogenic, plume-like Ne isotope compositions combined with radiogenic He isotopes ( <8 Ra) were reported for olivines from the Udachnaya-East kimberlite in Siberia22, very high 3He/4He (up to 27 Ra) and MORB-like He isotope values were documented in olivine from two kimberlite provinces in western and southern Greenland (Sarfartoq and Pyramidefjeld, respectively)39. In contrast, olivine grains from the Holocene Igwisi Hills kimberlite in Tanzania have relatively low 3He/4He (~5 Ra)40.

The goal of this contribution is to provide additional constraints on the genesis of kimberlites by exploring the isotope systematics of noble gases (He, Ne, Ar) in kimberlites worldwide. We present He, Ne and Ar isotope compositions of fluids trapped in 35 olivine separates from 18 kimberlites around the globe with ages ranging from Neoproterozoic ( ~600 Ma) to Cenozoic (14 kyr), including kimberlites from Udachnaya-East and Sarfartoq (Supplementary Data 1). To understand the origin of olivine-hosted fluids and identify potential contributions from crustal components, noble gas data are supplemented by fluid inclusion petrography and determinations of trace element concentrations and Sr-Nd isotope ratios in the residues of olivines that were crushed in vacuo for noble-gas isotope analysis (see ‘Methods’). These analyses are combined with trace element and Sr-Nd-Hf isotope determinations of bulk kimberlite samples from which the olivines were extracted. This approach constrains the roles of source variations, including contributions from ancient lower-mantle and deeply subducted components, interaction with metasomatised lithospheric mantle and crustal contamination in the genesis of kimberlites.

Results

He-Ne-Ar isotopes of olivine in kimberlites

The criteria for sample selection includes wide geographic (9 cratons in 4 continents) and temporal coverage (between 582 Ma—Finland Pipe 1—and 14 kyr—Igwisi Hills), limited olivine alteration, and existing noble-gas data (see Supplementary Data 1 for details). The Victor kimberlite (Canada) was included because it is located along the Great Meteor hot-spot track41 while Letseng (Lesotho), Karowe (Botswana) and Monastery (South Africa) are known to contain sub-lithospheric diamonds42, potentially suggesting very deep origins43. The kimberlites were also selected to reflect geochemical variations that suggest input from various components including metasomatised lithospheric-mantle wall rocks in micaceous kimberlites from Sierra Leone (Koidu and Tonguma44) or subducted material in those from Lac de Gras (Boa and Leslie45) in Canada.

All the kimberlites generally contain abundant macrocrysts ( >1 mm) and microcrysts of olivine (Supplementary Fig. S1) and other less abundant phases (e.g., phlogopite, garnet, clinopyroxene, ilmenite) in a fine-grained groundmass dominated by carbonates and/or serpentine with variable spinel, apatite and perovskite. Regardless of size, olivine is typically zoned between mantle-derived xenocrystic cores and magmatic rims (see details in ref.46). Fluid inclusions are small (generally <10 μm in size) but abundant and arranged in trails and elongated swarms that cut across olivine zonation (Fig. 1). These inclusions typically host dominant Ca-Mg and alkaline carbonates47,48. They are clearly secondary in origin, in that they formed via fluid infiltration after olivine crystallisation at sufficiently high temperatures (e.g., ≥400–500 °C) to allow olivine annealing and entrapment of residual fluids.

Fig. 1: Representative images of trails of secondary fluid inclusions in olivine.
figure 1

a Optical image of fluid inclusions in a olivine macrocrysts from Wesselton (Kimberley, South Africa). b Back-scattered electron SEM image of zoned olivine phenocryst from Internationalnaya (Siberia, Russia). Note that the fluid inclusion trails are associated with linear domains of recrystallised olivine that cut across the xenocrystic olivine core.

To examine the composition of trapped noble gases, olivine grains were separated from crushed kimberlite samples (Supplementary Fig. S2). Noble gas isotope analysis was performed by crushing in vacuum at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (WHOI) and Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC) (‘Methods’). Helium isotopes are systematically more radiogenic than the MORB composition with 3He/4He values below 6 Ra (Fig. 2; Supplementary Data 2-3). Analyses undertaken at WHOI and SUERC yield consistent results (Supplementary Fig. S3). 3He/4He values show a broad inverse relationship with 4He contents (Fig. 2a) indicating that the relative abundance of 4He* (i.e. 4He in-grown or implanted after kimberlite emplacement) profoundly impacts 3He/4He (see discussion below) and is dominant in the oldest kimberlites. Helium isotopes indeed show a broad relationship with age, where Neoproterozoic and Cambrian kimberlites exhibit the lowest 3He/4He (≤2.3 Ra; Fig. 2b), including all samples from western Greenland. These results are in stark contrast with those of Tachibana et al. 39 who detected very high 3He/4He (up to 27 Ra) in kimberlites from Sarfartoq, western Greenland. Conversely, our analyses of Udachnaya-East and Igwisi Hills olivine are entirely consistent with those of Sumino et al. 22 and Brown et al. 40, respectively. The He isotope compositions of Mesozoic and Cenozoic kimberlites are broadly similar to those measured in Cenozoic alkaline mafic lavas from continental intraplate settings (5.9 ± 1.2 Ra49; Fig. 2a) with the exception of highly to moderately micaceous kimberlites (Koidu-Tonguma and Kimberley, respectively) which exhibit lower 3He/4He (<4 Ra). It is noteworthy that mantle xenoliths entrained by kimberlites worldwide (southern Africa, Siberia, Canada50,51) show the same range in He isotopes (0.05 to 6 Ra) as kimberlites in this study, except for a less radiogenic dunite xenolith from Udachnaya-East with 3He/4He (9.8 Ra) above the MORB range.

Fig. 2: He isotope compositions of olivine in kimberlites.
figure 2

3He/4He (expressed as ratio R normalised to the atmospheric ratio Ra) versus (a) 4He concentrations in olivine and (b) age of kimberlite emplacement for the samples from this study (only data acquired in Woods Hole), Sumino et al. 22 (S + 2006) and Tachibana et al. 39 (T + 2006). Each symbol represents analyses of the same sample. Error bars represent 1σ uncertainties. The 3He/4He ranges of MORBs unaffected by plume contributions1,15 and intracontinental alkaline mafic magmas49 are shown for comparison. The He isotope data of Igwisi Hills olivine from Brown et al. 40 completely overlap with our results.

In contrast to He, the isotopes of Ne vary from less to more nucleogenic than the reference MORB value52,53 (Fig. 3). All Ne isotope ratios except for two measurements are resolvable ( >2 × standard deviation) from the air composition, clearly indicating that mantle Ne is present in the majority of olivines. Victor and Udachnaya-East exhibit Ne isotope compositions that are less nucleogenic than MORBs with 21Ne/22NeS (extrapolated to 20Ne/22Ne = 12.5) of 0.046–0.051 (n = 3) and 0.051–0.055 (n = 8), respectively (where such extrapolation is justified by the ubiquitous occurrence of air-related Ne in olivine). Our Udachnaya-East data are similar, although marginally more nucleogenic than those reported by Sumino et al. 22 for olivine separates from the same locality, resulting in a lower slope for the linear regression through our data in a 20Ne/22Ne-21Ne/22Ne plot (Fig. 3). These data point to the occurrence of lower-mantle Ne in these kimberlites, as discussed below. 40Ar/36Ar are also typically resolvable from the air composition (298.6) and range up to ~11,000 in micaceous kimberlites from Koidu with high values recorded in other kimberlites (e.g., up 8000 in Udachnaya-East; Supplementary Data 2). Linear correlations between 40Ar/36Ar and ratios of primordial isotopes (i.e. not affected by radiogenic/nucleogenic processes: 20Ne/22Ne and 3He/36Ar; Supplementary Fig. S4) in multiple analyses of the same sample indicate a predominant mantle origin for Ar including variable contribution from radiogenic 40Ar.

Fig. 3: Ne isotope compositions of olivine in kimberlites.
figure 3

20Ne/22Ne versus 21Ne/22Ne in olivine from this study and Sumino et al. 22 (S + 2006). Each symbol represents analyses of the same sample, with smaller symbols indicating 20Ne counts <1 × 10−11. Error bars represent 1σ uncertainties. The dotted curves show regressions through representative deep-mantle plumes [Galapagos73, Baffin16, Lohii75,98, Kerguelen1], previous data for the Udachnaya-East kimberlite22, mid-ocean ridge basalts [MORB52,53,63] and sub-continental lithospheric mantle xenoliths [SCLM94]. The grey arrow labelled ‘crust’ indicates the approximate trajectory of crustal Ne60, while the blue arrow labelled ‘kinetic’ represents the direction of kinetic fractionation from typical MORB compositions53. Note that regressions through the Jericho and Karowe data points do not intersect air, which probably indicates trapping of a “fractionated air” component consisting of a mixture of air-Ne and crustal Ne (see ‘Methods’).

Trace element concentrations and Sr-Nd isotopes in olivine

Noble gas data provide robust evidence for a mantle origin of the fluids trapped in olivine. However, radiogenic helium is clearly present, and the noble gases do not rule out crustal contributions, which is possible considering the secondary origin of fluid inclusions in kimberlitic olivine. To address this issue, the trace element and Sr-Nd isotope composition of crushed olivine were measured after sample dissolution (‘Methods’). The rationale behind this approach is that the concentrations of elements strongly incompatible in olivine, including Rb, Sr, Sm, Nd, Th and U, are completely controlled by the composition and relative abundance of fluid inclusions – solid inclusions in olivine being scarce and dominated by spinel, which is depleted in these elements. This inference is confirmed by the comparison of laser ablation and solution-mode ICP-MS analyses of mantle olivine containing secondary fluid inclusions, which show eight and seven times higher concentrations in solution-mode analyses for Sr and U, respectively54.

Crushed olivines show high concentrations of compatible elements (e.g., Ni = 1950–2970 ppm; n = 21/22, i.e. one analysis with lower Ni) and, as expected, low concentrations of incompatible trace elements (e.g., Sr = 1.3–6.1 ppm; Ce = 0.12–0.98 ppm; U = 2–21 ppb; n = 15/22; Supplementary Data 3). Exceptions include olivine separates from Boa (Sr = 75–78 ppm; U = 171-224 ppb; n = 2), Igwisi Hills (6.8 ppm; 41 ppb), Ghacho Kué (18 ppm; 27 ppb) and Maniitsoq ( ≤33 ppm; 35–37 ppb; n = 3) where higher contents of Sr, U and other incompatible trace elements are consistent with optical observations of contamination by groundmass material attached to the olivine grains (Supplementary Fig. S1). Compared to bulk rock analyses of the same samples, the olivine separates show broadly similar primitive-mantle normalised patterns of incompatible trace elements although at much lower absolute values (Fig. 4). These characteristics argue for fluid inclusions exerting a dominant control on the trace element budgets of the majority of incompatible elements measured in olivine residues. Positive anomalies of Pb and Sr and flat HREE profiles in some olivine separates compared to negative Pb and Sr anomalies and negatively sloping REE in bulk kimberlites probably stem from localised crustal contribution to the fluids trapped in olivine55. Age-corrected Sr and Nd isotopes of the olivine separates are generally indistinguishable from those of bulk kimberlites (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. S5). Exceptions include Victor and, to a lesser extent, Udachnaya-East, where higher 87Sr/86Sr in olivine point towards some crustal contamination of the trapped fluids; and Jericho, where the lower 87Sr/86Sr of olivine rather suggest some crustal contribution to the bulk sample. These data indicate that olivine trapped mostly pristine magmatic fluids with crustal contamination evident in only some cases.

Fig. 4: Primitive-mantle normalised trace element diagrams of olivine separates and bulk kimberlite rocks.
figure 4

Positive anomalies for Ta ( ± Nb) and Ti in olivine probably indicate inclusions of ilmenite ( ± spinel) in some olivine separates (see Supplementary Fig. S1). Positive anomalies of Pb and Sr coupled with flat HREE patterns are consistent with variable crustal contamination in some olivine separates. Beyond these differences, the patterns of olivine separates show similar shapes to those of their bulk kimberlite samples, which underpins a magmatic origin for the fluids trapped in olivine.

Fig. 5: Comparison of Sr and Nd isotopes in olivines and kimberlites.
figure 5

Sr and Nd isotopes are corrected for radiogenic ingrowth using kimberlite emplacement ages (Supplementary Data 1), and measured Rb/Sr and Sm/Nd ratios (Supplementary Data 3). Straight connectors link olivine compositions to those of bulk kimberlite samples (‘bulk’) from which the olivine grains were separated. The isotopic compositions of olivine are assumed to reflect those of trapped fluid inclusions.

Discussion

The Udachnaya-East and Victor kimberlites have less nucleogenic Ne isotope compositions compared to the upper mantle source of MORBs (Fig. 3). These data point to lower-mantle contributions for these kimberlites potentially related to plumes from the core-mantle boundary. However, the lack of high 3He/4He in Udachnaya-East and Victor (Fig. 2), despite their plume-like Ne isotopic compositions, is intriguing. The absence of plume-like 3He/4He in West Greenland is also an interesting finding, even though five kimberlites from two adjacent fields were examined, including Sarfartoq where high 3He/4He values had been previously reported39. The observed relationships between 3He/4He and both 4He and age (Fig. 2) suggest a likely addition of 4He* either in-grown or implanted into the olivine inclusions, at least for the Cambrian and Neoproterozoic samples. Calculations of 4He* ingrowth and implantation are highly model-dependent and hence inconclusive (see ‘Methods’ for details of calculations and related discussion). These data, however, do demonstrate the challenges of interpreting He measurements in ancient Th-U-rich rocks. The measured 3He/4He therefore represent minimum values for the kimberlite mantle sources in the Cambrian and Neoproterozoic samples, which might have been further lowered by crustal contamination and interaction with the lithospheric mantle as discussed below. The role of 4He* ingrowth and implantation in the younger samples is probably more limited, and effectively negligible in the Holocene kimberlites from Igwisi Hills. Below, the full array of data acquired in this study is employed to assess processes which might have affected noble gases in kimberlites and their olivine during magma ascent and emplacement, followed by potential variations in kimberlite source compositions.

Noble gas modification during kimberlite ascent and emplacement

During ascent to the surface, kimberlites exsolve abundant volatiles, a process which probably governs their very fast ascent and promotes their ability to transport xenoliths up to several decimetres in size. The contrasting solubilities of noble gases in melts and volatile-rich fluids affect their relative abundances in the fluid inclusions trapped by olivine as suggested by the direct correlations observed between log(4He/40Ar*) and log(4He/21Ne*) (Fig. 6). 4He/21Ne* values exceeding the mantle production ratio (2.2 × 107 56) further point to substantial contribution of post-crystallisation 4He* in olivine from Neoproterozoic kimberlites. The low He/Ne and He/Ar of olivine suggest variable He loss after kimberlite emplacement. Alternatively, the trapped fluids could represent an exsolved fluid phase, rather than residual melts47,48, due to lower solubility of He compared to Ne and Ar in hydrous fluids relative to silicate and carbonate melts20,57,58.

Fig. 6: Extent of He loss in fluids trapped by olivine.
figure 6

4He/21Ne* versus 4He/40Ar* in olivine where 21Ne* and 40Ar* represent nucleogenic Ne and radiogenic Ar, respectively, that is corrected for air contribution and assuming 20Ne/22Ne = 12.5 for 21Ne*. Each symbol represents analyses of the same sample, with smaller symbols indicating 20Ne counts <1 × 10−11. The vertical dotted lines represent the mantle (and crustal) production rate of 2.2 × 10756. DMM represent the composition of undegassed MORBs1.

Beyond exsolving fluids, kimberlites variably interact with crustal rocks during emplacement59. Crustal contamination, perhaps via mixing with crustal fluids, is evident in the higher Sr isotope compositions of olivine versus bulk rocks from Victor and Udachnaya-East (Fig. 5). It is also supported by positive Pb and Sr anomalies in the trace element patterns of these olivines (Fig. 4). Crustal contamination introduces strongly radiogenic He and nucleogenic Ne in mantle-derived magmas due to the scarcity of 3He and 22Ne in the crust. In addition, the rate of 4He* production in contaminated magmas is high due to high abundances of U and Th in continental crust60. The isotopes of He are therefore more substantially affected by crustal contamination than those of Ne because kimberlite fluids trapped in olivine have low He/Ne compared to the 4He-rich continental crust – the latter being approximated by the 4He/21Ne* crustal production rate60 (Fig. 6; see also the ‘crustal contamination’ curve in Fig. 7). The implication is that 3He/4He in Victor and Udachnaya-East olivine represent minimum values compared to their sources – a hypothesis explored further below.

Fig. 7: Comparison of Ne, He and Nd isotopes in kimberlites.
figure 7

Olivine 21Ne/22NeS versus (a) 4He/3He; and (b) bulk-rock Nd isotopes in the samples from this study and Sumino et al. 22 (S + 2006). Each symbol represents analyses of the same sample, with smaller symbols indicating 20Ne counts <1 × 10−11. 21Ne/22NeS is the extrapolation of 21Ne/22Ne to 20Ne/22Ne = 12.5. Panel a shows mixing trajectories between a plume component from the lower mantle (either ‘source’, ‘melt’ or a ‘fluid’ exsolved therefrom) with the isotopic composition of the Baffin picrites (‘plume’6,16); or an upper mantle component with the isotopic composition of MORBs (‘DMM’1); and subducted oceanic crust (‘subducted crust’ mixed in the source), metasomatised sub-continental lithospheric wall rocks (‘SCLM’ assimilated during ascent) and continental crust contaminant (‘crust’ contributing to the exsolved fluid). The % values next to the mixing curves indicate the amount of crustal or lithospheric mantle component added. Details of the endmember compositions employed for mixing are in ‘Methods’. Note that while mixing models involving SCLM wall rocks intersect the compositions of olivine in kimberlites, these models require unrealistically large contributions (generally >70%) from the lithospheric mantle. The high 21Ne/22NeS calculated for Karowe and Letseng (Lesotho-Monastery) are probably unrealistic (see ‘Methods’).

Whilst crustal contamination is not ubiquitous, a fundamental role of interaction with lithospheric mantle wall rocks is well established for the petrogenesis of kimberlites worldwide25,46,61. For example, a combination of mica enrichment, elevated Sr isotopes and chondritic to marginally super-chondritic Nd-Hf isotopes in micaceous kimberlites from Koidu and Tonguma probably indicates an important contribution from metasomatised, phlogopite-bearing lithologies in the lithospheric mantle that was traversed by kimberlite melts sourced from the convecting mantle44. These kimberlites show the lowest 3He/4He (≤2.3 Ra) among the samples younger than 500 Ma (Fig. 2) with Ne isotopes typical of the SCLM (Fig. 3) and 4He/21Ne* close to the mantle production rate (Fig. 6). Although it seems possible that 4He is derived in part from implantation from the micaceous groundmass (see ‘Methods’), these data suggest that phlogopite-rich lithospheric mantle contributed, at least marginally, to the noble gas and volatile budget of the Koidu and Tonguma kimberlites.

A similar conclusion can be reached for the moderately micaceous kimberlites from Kimberley (Wesselton and Bultfontein) which show broadly similar isotopic compositions to the Koidu and Tonguma samples for the noble gases and lithophile elements Sr, Nd and Hf (Figs. 25; Supplementary Fig. S5) combined with a well-established enrichment in mica of the underlying lithospheric mantle62. Mixing models show that the He-Ne isotope composition of the Kimberley kimberlites can be crudely reproduced by combining He and Ne from a melt derived from either an upper mantle source with MORB-like He-Ne isotope compositions1,63, or a lower-mantle source similar to that of the Baffin picrites6,11,16, and noble gases from phlogopite-rich lithospheric mantle (Fig. 7; see ‘Methods’ for details). However, all of these models entail deriving disproportionate amounts of noble gases from the lithospheric mantle ( >70–80%), given that kimberlite melts are likely to have at least one or two orders of magnitude higher concentrations of noble gases than metasomatised lithospheric mantle lithologies. Therefore, unless either the lithospheric mantle hosts substantially larger amounts of He and Ne than those measured in mantle xenoliths or we have grossly overestimated the concentrations of noble gases in kimberlites, interaction with lithospheric mantle rocks can only have a limited effect on the noble gas isotope composition of kimberlites.

Noble gas constraints on the kimberlite source

The alternative explanation for the He-Ne isotope signature of the Kimberley kimberlites is a contribution from subducted crustal material, a model previously invoked to explain the Sr-Nd-Hf and S isotope systematics of these kimberlites23,64. The oceanic crust loses all of its He and most of its Ne budget during subduction65,66 but experiences substantial ingrowth of radiogenic He and nucleogenic Ne during mantle residence (see ‘Methods’). Mixing models show that addition of subducted material to the convecting mantle can generate He-Ne isotopic signatures that are intermediate between those produced by crustal contamination (substantial decrease of 3He/4He at relatively invariant 21Ne/22NeS for low degrees of contamination) and interaction with metasomatised lithospheric mantle (moderate decrease in 3He/4He with increasing 21Ne/22NeS; Fig. 7). Mixing trajectories between an upper mantle source (with or without some lower-mantle influence) and subducted oceanic crust ( <5%) intersect the composition of the Kimberley kimberlites (Fig. 7). The He-Ne isotopes of the Lac de Gras kimberlites may be similarly explained by adding <2% of subducted crust to an upper mantle source (Fig. 7), which is consistent with the peculiar geochemically-enriched Nd-Hf isotope compositions45 and the lack of a geodynamic connection with deep-mantle plumes for these kimberlites25,29. It is noteworthy that the mixing model requires the subducted crustal material to have higher Ne/He than the convecting mantle source to fit the Kimberley and Lac de Gras data, which is consistent with the more efficient loss of He from subducted materials compared to Ne during subduction via dehydration66,67 and/or during mantle storage via diffusion.

Olivine separates and bulk-kimberlite samples from Victor and Udachnaya-East exhibit the highest age-corrected Nd isotope compositions (εNdi; Figs. 5 and 7) with values overlapping the evolution curve of the common, moderately geochemically-depleted (PREMA-like) component identified in kimberlites worldwide35. Despite some crustal contamination of the trapped fluids based on higher 87Sr/86Sri of olivine compared to their bulk rocks (Fig. 5), these kimberlites have experienced minimal contributions from subducted crustal material or interaction with metasomatised lithospheric mantle, which both lower εNdi. We believe these minimal contributions favoured the preservation of plume-like Ne isotopes in these kimberlites (Fig. 7). This is a key finding of this study: i.e. that isotopic signatures of deep and/or ancient mantle are preserved exclusively in the most geochemically-depleted kimberlites and only by isotopic systems least affected by crustal contamination. This conclusion contrasts, at least partly, from observations available for other mantle-derived magmas such as ocean island basalts where Ne-isotope plume signatures are associated with geochemical indicators (e.g., Sr-Pb isotopes) of subducted material in their sources18,68,69. A connection between the Victor kimberlite and a deep-mantle plume is consistent with its ___location along the Great Meteor hot-spot track41. High 3He/4He (up to 52 Ra) in sub-lithospheric diamonds from Juina (Brazil) were similarly suggested to be linked to the deep-mantle plume that generated Cretaceous kimberlites in Brazil70. Udachnaya-East shows the most negative μ182W recorded in kimberlites36 with olivine in one mantle xenolith and clinopyroxene in three mantle xenoliths from this locality exhibiting 3He/4He values marginally above the MORB range50 and Ne isotopes less nucleogenic than MORBs71, respectively. These features, as well as unradiogenic He and non-nucleogenic Ne in kimberlite-related fibrous diamonds from the nearby Nyurbinskaya kimberlite72, point to lower mantle contributions probably related to deep-mantle plumes for the Devonian kimberlites in Siberia, including Udachnaya-East. While we cannot completely rule out kinetic fractionation53 as an explanation for plume-like Ne isotopes (i.e., vector towards increasing 20Ne/22Ne in Fig. 3), we note that samples with the most geochemically-depleted compositions (i.e. highest Nd isotopes) also appear to have other features supporting a deep and/or ancient mantle contribution, therefore lending support to the plume hypothesis.

Yet, both Victor and Udachnaya-East olivines exhibit moderately radiogenic 3He/4He (5.4-5.8 Ra and 5.0-5.7 Ra, respectively) apparently at odds with their low 21Ne/22NeS. If He and Ne isotopes reflect the secular evolution of a compositionally homogeneous source, production of 4He* and 21Ne* should be tightly linked by radioactive decay of U and Th, as it is commonly the case for young oceanic basalts and their olivines (e.g.1,52,73). This is clearly not the case for Victor and Udachnaya-East where ‘decoupling’ of He and Ne isotopes requires contribution of at least an additional component, perhaps crustal contamination identified in the olivine Sr isotopes (Fig. 5). Modelling shows that this process can lower 3He/4He while leaving Ne isotopes largely unaffected (Fig. 7) with Nd isotopes being similarly unmodified from their mantle values due to low solubility of REE in hydrous fluids and moderately low concentrations of LREEs in the continental crust74. Crustal contamination is a viable explanation for the relatively low 3He/4He only if the 21Ne/22NeS of the source was intermediate between the Baffin picrites and MORB values as can be gauged from the mixing trajectories in Fig. 7. Assuming similar 22Ne (and 3He) contents in the sources, higher 21Ne/22NeS (and lower 3He/4He) of the kimberlite source compared to typical deep-mantle plumes such as Baffin16, Hawaii75 or Galapagos73 is consistent with a more fertile source for kimberlites (or at least more fertile components participating in partial melting) containing higher U and Th concentrations.

Implications for noble gas signatures in the lithospheric and deep convective mantle

This study shows that kimberlites, which derive from the convective mantle24,25,27,45, share similar He isotope compositions to the mantle xenoliths they entrain (0.05 to 6 Ra50,51). This overlap confirms previous suggestions that noble gases in mantle xenoliths are dominated by input from entraining and/or precursor magmas which infiltrate the lithospheric mantle not long before eruption51,76. This view is consistent with the dominant secondary and, therefore, late origin of fluid inclusions in mantle xenoliths as well as abundant evidence of interaction between mantle xenoliths and their transporting media25,77. It is further supported by the occurrence of plume-like He-Ne isotope compositions in lithospheric mantle xenoliths transported to the surface by plume-related magmas at Samoa, Hawaii and in south-eastern Australia78,79. Although radiogenic and nucleogenic noble gases produced in situ in the lithospheric mantle might contribute to the percolating sub-lithospheric melts49,51, mass balance calculations presented in this work indicate a limited role for indigenous lithospheric-mantle noble gases in the convecting-mantle melts that traverse the lithospheric mantle.

It is clear that at least some kimberlites, and specifically those least affected by addition of deeply subducted material and/or interaction with metasomatised lithospheric-mantle rocks (e.g., Victor, Udachnaya-East), contain primordial Ne derived from the lower mantle. These results combined with previous noble gas22, W isotope36 and Nd-Hf isotope data35, as well as geodynamic reconstructions28,29,41, underline a link between some kimberlites and plumes from ancient domains in the lower mantle43. It is noteworthy that these kimberlites are not renowned hosts of sub-lithospheric diamonds, which underscores a potential dichotomy between kimberlite source regions and origin of entrained sub-lithospheric material, the latter probably sourced from lithologies that underplated continental lithospheric roots80. Conversely, it is evident that some kimberlites (e.g., Lac de Gras) are not related to deep-mantle plumes as shown by the noble-gas data presented herein, while the data are inconclusive for other kimberlites (e.g., Kimberley) where subducted crustal material appear to largely influence the isotopes of He and Ne. In these cases, it is currently not possible to unanimously establish whether the sources of these kimberlites are in the upper or lower convecting mantle. Application of noble gas isotope analyses, combined with the analysis of the decay products (129Xe, 182W, 142Nd) of short-lived isotopes, to kimberlites minimally affected by components derived from subducted material, interaction with metasomatised lithospheric mantle and/or crustal contamination will help elucidate the origin of deep and ancient components in the genesis of kimberlites. This work establishes the examination of geochemically depleted kimberlites as a promising tool to investigate the preservation of ancient mantle heterogeneities in the deep Earth.

A corollary of this study is that Ne isotopes, in samples where mantle contributions can be separated from air contamination, represent more robust tracers of the preservation of early Earth heterogeneities in magmas from the deep mantle compared to He isotopes, especially in continental settings. The likely reason is that plumes from the lower mantle have Ne/He ratios substantially higher than those of upper mantle and crustal contaminants as also noted in some previous studies19,20,21,73, combined with the importance of radiogenic helium in the older samples, herein demonstrated using kimberlites. Neon isotope measurements of intraplate continental lavas, for which data are restricted to some LIPs5,16,17,19,81, therefore represent a new avenue of research to detect potential contributions by deep-mantle plumes or material thereof, especially if combined with petrographic, trace element and Sr-Nd isotope analyses of fluid inclusions in olivine. This approach can be extended to ancient rocks where interpretation of He isotopes is complicated by radiogenic ingrowth and implantation, processes that affect Ne to a much lesser extent.

Methods

Noble gas analyses

Offcuts of kimberlite samples were fragmented using either a ring mill or a Selfrag, which employs electrostatic discharges to disaggregate rock samples along grain boundaries. This latter method produces cleaner olivine grains, i.e. with less adhered groundmass. After sieving the crushed material, olivine was separated from the 1–2 mm and 0.7–1.0 mm size fractions using a binocular microscope. Separated olivines were then cleaned using various combinations of diluted nitric acid and acetic acid followed by distilled water and acetone to remove carbonates and other groundmass impurities. This step was followed by further olivine purification by picking out olivine grains with evident contamination by extraneous material. For samples BV-1 (Boa, Lac de Gras) and MPV-04-193 (Ghacho Kué) it was not possible to obtain a clean separately, whereas for samples WESK-8 (Wesselton, Kimberley) and 527 (Maniitsoq, West Greenland) both clean and contaminated separates were obtained and measured for comparison (Supplementary Fig. S3).

The analyses of noble gas (He, Ne and Ar) contents and isotopic compositions were conducted at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institutions (WHOI) with a subset of the same samples, including two contaminated olivine separates, measured at the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC; He only). In both laboratories, the analyses were conducted exclusively by in vacuo crushing using a magnetically actuated metallic sphere and a hydraulic crusher equipped with a vertical piston, respectively. At WHOI, He, Ne and Ar were measured sequentially on the same sample aliquot with loaded olivine masses ranging between 0.21 g and 1.16 g, but generally >0.6 g. Two crushing steps of 10, 20 or 40 strokes each were generally applied to extract the gases trapped in fluid inclusions. The extracted gases were purified on a fully automated extraction line using two SAES ST707 pellet getters, one held at 300 °C and the other between room temperature and 300 °C. The gases were pre-measured (and split if necessary) using a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) to ensure that gas sample size in the mass spectrometer matched standard size. Following purification and trapping, the noble gases were selectively desorbed from a charcoal trap (helium) and a nude stainless-steel trap (neon and argon). Helium and Ne isotopes were measured using a MAP 215-50 mass spectrometer locally referred to as MS5, and Ar isotopes using a dedicated Hiden QMS. Standards and blanks bracketed the samples as closely as possible. The helium standard tank was produced from MORB glass with a 3He/4He of 8.34 ± 0.05 Ra (calibrated against air using a separate mass spectrometer); error estimates were dominated by reproducibility of standard aliquots, which was typically 1%. Neon and argon were calibrated with air aliquots from a separate tank. Helium blanks were less than 1 × 10−11 cc STP 4He; blanks for 20Ne and 40Ar during the course of this study were typically less than 1 × 10−12 and 2 × 10−10 cc STP, respectively. Blanks are negligible for helium and argon, but neon isotope data are considered to be robust only for 20Ne > 1 × 10−11 cc STP in the mass spectrometer (approximately 10 times the blank) but are still reported for comparative purposes where 20Ne is higher than 6 × 10−12 cc STP (small symbols in Figs. 3, 6 and 7). The mass spectrometer and extraction line have been described previously63,73.

For the He analyses at SUERC, approximately 0.30 g of olivine was crushed. The released gas was purified using SAES getters and two liquid-N cooled charcoal traps. Helium concentrations and isotope compositions were measured using a ThermoFisher Helix SFT mass spectrometer tuned to the maximum sensitivity. The average blank levels are 2 ± 0.2 × 108 and 5 ± 2 × 103 atoms of 4He and 3He, respectively. Sensitivity and mass discrimination were determined by repeated analysis of the HESJ standard revealing a reproducibility of ±0.2%. The crushing procedure releases <0.05% of the total cosmogenic He present in olivine82 so the analyses presented here are largely unaffected by lattice-hosted He components.

Olivine and kimberlite trace element and Sr-Nd-Hf isotope analyses

Residues of crushed olivine after the noble gas analyses were employed for trace element and Sr-Nd isotope analyses by solution methods at ETH Zurich. For complete sample characterisation, the trace element and Sr-Nd-Hf isotope compositions of bulk kimberlite samples were also characterised following the same analytical procedure outlined by Fitzpayne et al. 44, which is summarised below. About 200 mg of crushed olivine and 100 mg of powdered fresh chips of kimberlite were digested during 48 h in Teflon bomb at 120 °C using an HF-HNO3 mix (3:1). Residues such as oxides or fluorides were subsequently re-dissolved using aqua regia to obtain optically clean solutions. A 10% fraction of each dissolved sample was set aside for trace element analysis and dried down before dilution into 2% HNO3 − 0.005 M HF. A multi-element spike containing Be, In and Bi was added prior to analysis of the solutions, which was undertaken using an Element XR sector field ICP-MS. The isotopes 9Be, 115In and 209Bi were used as internal standards, and the reference materials BIR-1 (USGS basalt) and BE-N (CRPG basalt) were used for calibration of olivine and bulk kimberlite analyses, respectively. USGS basalt BCR-2 and BHVO-2 were analysed as unknowns for quality control and yielded results consistent with published reference values (Supplementary Data 3).

Strontium, Nd, and Hf were separated from the remaining solutions using ion-exchange column-chromatography methods adapted from Münker et al. 83 and Pin et al. 84. Procedural blanks for Sr (45 pg), Nd (20 pg), and Hf (30 pg) were all negligible relative to the sample amounts including Sr and Nd in the olivine separates (e.g., Sr loads generally between 5–10 ng). Strontium isotope analyses of olivine and bulk-rock were carried out using a Thermo-Fisher Triton thermal ionisation mass spectrometer (TIMS) and a Neptune MC-ICP-MS, respectively. Instrumental mass bias was corrected by internal normalization to 88Sr/86Sr = 8.37521 using the exponential law and for the TIMS analyses 87Sr/86Sr additionally normalized to a preferred 87Sr/86Sr ratio for the NBS SRM987 standard (87Sr/86Sr = 0.710249) based on the average measured 87Sr/86Sr ratio for SRM987 in the barrel (for TIMS) or session (for MC-ICP-MS) in which the sample was analysed. The USGS basalt BHVO-2, BIR-1 and BCR-2 were analysed as unknowns alongside the olivine samples and returned 87Sr/86Sr values within uncertainty of expected values (Supplementary Data 3). Analyses of Nd and Hf isotopes were carried out using a Nu Plasma II multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS). Instrumental mass bias was corrected by normalization to 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219 and 179Hf/177Hf = 0.7325 using the exponential law. 143Nd/144Nd and 176Hf/177Hf ratios for unknowns and secondary standards are normalized to La Jolla Nd = 0.511858 and JMC475 = 0.282160, respectively. Analyses of secondary reference materials including the J-Nd solution standard and USGS basalts are consistent with accepted values (Supplementary Data 3). Age corrections were calculated using kimberlite emplacement ages available in the literature (Supplementary Data 1) and 87Rb/86Sr, 147Sm/144Nd and 176Lu/177Hf ratios derived from trace element data for the same sample solutions (Supplementary Data 3). εNd and εHf values are calculated relative to the chondritic (CHUR) composition of Bouvier et al. 85. The Rb, Sm and Lu decay constants are 1.397 × 10−11/yr, 6.54 × 10−12/yr and 1.865 × 10−11/yr, respectively.

Olivine selection and assessment of sample contamination

Most of the helium data in the literature is derived from measurements of basaltic glasses and crystals in young lava flows; there are few data from older lava flows, and even fewer from kimberlites. Selection of fresh olivine that is not contaminated by serpentine or attached groundmass (Supplementary Fig. S2) appears to have an important control on measured He isotopes. In order to evaluate the influence of groundmass and serpentinization processes, two samples with sufficient material (Wesselton WESK-8; Maniitsoq 527) were divided into relatively “pure” and “contaminated” olivine fractions. These two fractions showed markedly different 3He/4He between the uncontaminated and contaminated fractions, with the contaminated olivines yielding two to three times lower 3He/4He ratios (Supplementary Fig. S3 and Supplementary Data 2). It is difficult to definitively attribute this difference to contributions of crustal 4He in hydrothermal fluids that crystallise serpentine in kimberlites47 or 4He* produced in the U-Th-rich groundmass attached to the contaminated olivine grains. Regardless, the olivine separates used for this study generally contain negligible contamination compared to the contaminated olivines of samples WESK-8 and 527 where olivine was expressly selected to monitor the effect of serpentinisation and contamination by groundmass material.

Modelling of 4He* ingrowth and implantation

No attempt was made to estimate or correct for the potential effect of cosmogenic 3He since kimberlite emplacement because all the samples come from underground mining activity with the exception of the West Greenland samples where snow coverage provides screening from cosmic rays for most of the year. Ingrowth and implantation of radiogenic 4He* probably affected measured 3He/4He and was modelled as follows.

Radiogenic 4He generated in olivine fluid inclusions after olivine formation (4He*) was calculated using the following equation1:

$${\scriptstyle{4}\atop} \!{He} \ast= {\scriptstyle{{238}}\atop} \!U\times \left\{8 \, \times \, \left[{e}^{\left(0.155125\times t\right)}-1\right]+\frac{7}{137.88}\times \left[{e} \, ^{\left(0.98485 \times t\right)}-1\right]\right. \\ \left.+6\times k\times \left[{e}^{\left(0.049475\times t\right)}-1\right]\right\}$$
(1)

Where 238U = U × 0.9927, k = 232Th/238U, and U and Th concentrations are from bulk olivine dissolution analyses (Supplementary Data 3); t is the kimberlite emplacement age (Supplementary Data 1); and both 238U and 4He* are in mol/g. 4He* produced by the U and Th measured in dissolved olivine exceeds the measured 4He content in 20% of the analyses (n = 5/25; Supplementary Fig. S6). This is probably due to incomplete release of lattice-hosted 4He by crushing51,86. In addition, it is likely that 4He* is not fully retained in fluid inclusions due to alpha particle (i.e. 4He*) ejection outside fluid inclusions into olivine lattice87 and loss of 4He* via diffusion and through cracks. Only a fraction of 4He* is retained in the fluid inclusions because alpha particle recoil distance in olivine (15–20 μm) exceeds the typical size ( <10 μm) of fluid inclusions (Fig. 1). However, 4He* could have been recoiled from nearby fluid inclusions because fluid inclusions in kimberlitic olivine generally occur in clusters and swarms of tens to hundreds or more inclusions. Hence, for modelling purpose, we arbitrarily assume that 10% of 4He* produced in olivine fluid inclusions ( ± lattice and material in crack and/or adhering to olivine) was released during crushing, which accounts for alpha particle injection into fluid inclusions from neighbouring fluid inclusions and 4He* diffusion from lattice to fluid inclusions. In this scenario, age-corrected 3He/4Hei would be similar to measured 3He/4He, except for some olivines showing clear evidence of groundmass contamination (e.g., Boa, Ghacho Kué; Supplementary Fig. S6). Hence, unless a substantially higher amount of 4He* is retained in the fluid inclusions, ingrowth of 4He* does not fully explain the more radiogenic He isotopes of Cambrian and Neoproterozoic kimberlites (Fig. 2).

In alternative, the high U and Th contents of kimberlite groundmass (1.2–6.1 ppm and 5.2–46 ppm for bulk samples in this study; Supplementary Data 3) provides ample opportunity for implantation of 4He* into olivine (as previously demonstrated for olivines in Jurassic basalts88). The amount (I) of radiogenic 4He* implanted into olivine fluid inclusions from the kimberlite groundmass was calculated using the equation of Dunai and Wijbrans89.

$$I={\scriptstyle{4}\atop} \!{He}*\times \left(\frac{3\times S}{4\times R}+\frac{{S}^{3}}{16\times {R}^{3}}\right)$$
(2)

Where S represents the track length ( ~ 20 μm) of alpha particles in kimberlite and olivine and R is the olivine radius (1000 μm). To calculate 4He* produced in the kimberlite groundmass, we used Eq. (1), kimberlite emplacement ages (Supplementary Data 1) and groundmass U-Th contents equal to twice the U and Th contents of the bulk kimberlite (Supplementary Data 3) to account for the diluting effect of ~50% by U-Th-free olivine in kimberlites. Similar results were obtained using the formulation of Lal90.

$$I={\scriptstyle{4}\atop} \!{He}*\times \frac{3\times S}{4\times R}\times \frac{{\rho }_{k}}{{\rho }_{{ol}}}$$
(3)

where ρk and ρol are the densities of kimberlite (2.5 g/cm3) and olivine (3.3 g/cm3), respectively. Implanted 4He* can be similar or exceed measured 4He even assuming an arbitrary 10% of retention of 4He* to account for the fraction of implanted 4He* that gets trapped in fluid inclusions (Supplementary Fig. S6). The effect of 4He* implantation is probably most substantial in the Cambrian and Neoproterozoic kimberlites, which all show low 3He/4He coupled with elevated 4He contents (Fig. 2), and perhaps also in low-3He/4He Mesozoic kimberlites from Koidu and Tonguma, which exhibit the highest concentrations of U (4.7–6.1 ppm) and Th (43–46 ppm) due to their mica-rich groundmass. However, these calculations provide upper estimates because olivine rims are not always fully preserved in kimberlites due to serpentinisation (Fig. 1). In addition, the fraction of implanted 4He* that is trapped in the fluid inclusions is unknown, which makes this model inconclusive.

In summary, while both radiogenic ingrowth and implantation act to lower the 3He/4He of olivine compared to the original values at the time of kimberlite crystallisation, the effect of these processes cannot be accurately quantified. Radioactive decay and implantation are of marginal relevance for Ne isotopes because track lengths of 21Ne* are much shorter than for 4He*, nucleogenic production of Ne is much slower and Ne diffusion slower than for He17.

He-Ne isotope mixing models

Binary mixing calculations were undertaken for 4He/3He and 21Ne/22Ne to simulate contamination of exsolved kimberlite fluids by continental crust, interaction between kimberlite melt and metasomatised lithospheric mantle, and contribution of recycled oceanic crust to the kimberlite source (Fig. 7). The compositions employed for each of the mixing endmembers are summarised in Supplementary Data 4 and described below.

For the kimberlite source, two different sets of isotopic compositions are employed for modelling and correspond to sources in the upper mantle (similar to MORB1: 4He/3He = 9.0 × 104; 21Ne/22Ne = 0.060) and low-3He/4He lower mantle (Baffin or proto-Icelandic plume6,16: 4He/3He = 1.1 × 104; 21Ne/22Ne = 0.035), respectively. The contents of He and Ne in the lower mantle are considered to be similar to those of mantle xenoliths enriched in noble gases (1 × 10−5 cm3/g and 1 × 10−10 cm3/g, respectively) with half of these concentrations but the same He/Ne ratio employed for the more degassed upper mantle. Using a higher Ne/He ratio in the plume source compared to the upper mantle19,20 would not substantially alter the results of these models. These same He-Ne isotopic compositions are employed for kimberlite melt and exsolved fluid, but the concentrations of He and Ne are assumed to be about two orders of magnitude higher than in the source to account for the strongly incompatible nature of noble gases. For the kimberlite melt endmember, He and Ne contents are similar to those of the Atlantic “popping rocks” with the highest noble gas concentrations52,63: He = 1 × 10−4 cm3/g; Ne = 3 × 10−9 cm3/g. The rationale for this choice is that noble gases in volatile-poor tholeiites (MORBs) were shown to have similar solubilities as in carbonate-rich melts (kimberlites)57 perhaps because higher CO2 contents decrease noble gas solubilities in (silicate) melts91. For the exsolved kimberlite fluid, the He content is halved compared to that in the kimberlite melt to account for the lower solubility of He compared to Ne in C-O-H fluids20,57,58.

The He content of the continental crust contaminant is assumed to be 1 × 10−3 cm3/g based on typical U-Th contents of the upper crust74 and an age of 2 Ga, with the Ne concentration (1 × 10−8 cm3/g) obtained using the employed He content and typical He/Ne ratios for crustal fluids92. 4He/3He (7.5 × 107) and 21Ne/22Ne (0.52) for the continental crust are taken from the compilation of Ballentine and Burnard60.

The metasomatised lithospheric mantle is considered to have the same Ne contents as the mantle xenoliths with the highest noble gas concentrations (Ne = 1 × 10-10 cm3/g, that is 22Ne ~ 1 × 10−11 cm3/g) and higher He contents than mantle xenoliths (i.e. He = 1 × 10−5 cm3/g) resulting from radiogenic ingrowth of 4He* in phlogopite-bearing lithologies with elevated U and Th contents (e.g., 4.6 × 10-5 cm3/g using U-Th contents from McIntyre et al. 93, and an age of 2 Ga). The He-Ne isotopic composition is varied between present-day estimates (4He/3He = 1.2 × 105; 21Ne/22Ne = 0.071) from Gautheron et al. 94 and higher 4He/3He and 21Ne/22Ne ratios that account for high time-integrated U and Th contents resulting from ancient metasomatic enrichment (e.g., 4He/3He = 5.6 × 105; 21Ne/22Ne = 0.237 for 2 Ga; Supplementary Data 4).

Finally, we model the age-dependent He-Ne isotopic composition of subducted oceanic crust using the following parameters: initial He = 1 × 10−7 cm3/g, and Ne = 1 × 10−11 cm3/g (or 22Ne ~ 1 × 10−12 cm3/g) corresponding to 1% and 10%, respectively, of He and Ne measured in typical MORBs and oceanic gabbros to account for He and Ne loss during subduction dehydration; 4He/3He = 1.2 × 105 and 21Ne/22Ne = 0.029 (that is air-like Ne) as measured by Moreira et al. 66 for partially altered oceanic gabbros. The age of subducted crust is varied between 1 and 2 Gyr and ingrowth of radiogenic 4He* and nucleogenic 21Ne* are calculated using U and Th concentrations of subducted-modified oceanic crust (0.029 and 0.252 ppm, respectively95). Only 10% of 4He* is retained in the subducted oceanic crust to account for diffusive loss of 4He to the ambient mantle96. However, if the resulting He concentration of the subducted crustal component becomes lower than He in the kimberlite mantle source, the latter is employed for the subducted crust (because diffusion is prevented due to lack of a He concentration gradient).

While we strive to employ endmembers with compositions as close as possible to natural values, we note that, especially for He and Ne concentrations, no independent constraints exist. Therefore, the binary mixing models should be considered approximations of natural scenarios.

Additional discussion of He-Ne isotope data

Some olivine separates provide anomalous Ne isotope compositions or the data appear to be inconclusive and are hence discussed here rather than in the main text. Jericho (Canada) and Karowe (Botswana) olivines represent special cases in this study where linear regressions through the Ne isotope data do not intersect the air value but rather a “fractionated air” component that probably consists of a mixture of air and crustal Ne (Fig. 3). Although the slopes of regressions through these data are similar to or shallower than that of MORBs, it is not possible to discern potential lower mantle contributions (if present) in these cases due to inputs from multiple components and lack of meaningful 21Ne/22NeS.

Of the two analyses of olivines from the Igwisi Hills (Tanzania), one shows atmospheric Ne and the second one a composition similar to those of the Lac de Gras olivines (Figs. 3 and 7). However, with only one available point distinct from air-Ne, any interpretation of these data is necessarily weak. Finally, for Letseng only one Ne isotope analysis is available (i.e. 20Ne > 6 × 10−12 cc): in this case, 21Ne/22NeS cannot be considered robust because the second component could be “fractionated air” as per the olivines from Jericho and Karowe. These considerations help explain why the Karowe and Letseng analyses plot at anomalously high 21Ne/22NeS considered their relatively low 4He/3He in Fig. 7 where no mixing model can be produced.

Direct correlations observed between log(4He/40Ar*) and log(4He/21Ne*) in kimberlite olivine (Fig. 6) suggest variable extents of He loss or trapping of exsolved fluids. Helium loss and/or fluid exsolution must have also impacted 3He/22NeS (where 22NeS reflect extrapolation to a 20Ne/22Ne of 12.5; Supplementary Fig. S7). Kimberlite olivines plot along a sub-parallel trend in log(3He/22NeS) vs log(4He/21Ne*) which extends to low 4He/21Ne* at relatively invariant 3He/22NeS, at odds with data from MORBs and OIBs. The origin of these low 3He/22NeS in kimberlites (1.0–4.2) is unclear and might reflect contributions from fluid exsolution as well as crustal contamination, which all contribute to lower 3He/22Ne from values perhaps as high as those of MORBs or Baffin picrites, i.e. the proto-Icelandic plume ( ~10)6,97.