Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Evolution of wheat blast resistance gene Rmg8 accompanied by differentiation of variants recognizing the powdery mildew fungus

Abstract

Wheat blast, a devastating disease having spread recently from South America to Asia and Africa, is caused by Pyricularia oryzae (synonym of Magnaporthe oryzae) pathotype Triticum, which first emerged in Brazil in 1985. Rmg8 and Rmg7, genes for resistance to wheat blast found in common wheat and tetraploid wheat, respectively, recognize the same avirulence gene, AVR-Rmg8. Here we show that an ancestral resistance gene, which had obtained an ability to recognize AVR-Rmg8 before the differentiation of Triticum and Aegilops, has expanded its target pathogens. Molecular cloning revealed that Rmg7 was an allele of Pm4, a gene for resistance to wheat powdery mildew on 2AL, whereas Rmg8 was its homoeologue on 2BL ineffective against wheat powdery mildew. Rmg8 variants with the ability to recognize AVR-Rmg8 were distributed not only in Triticum spp. but also in Aegilops speltoides, Aegilops umbellulata and Aegilops comosa. This result suggests that the origin of resistance gene(s) recognizing AVR-Rmg8 dates back to the time before differentiation of A, B, S, U and M genomes, that is, ~5 Myr before the emergence of its current target, the wheat blast fungus. Phylogenetic analyses suggested that, in the evolutionary process thereafter, some of their variants gained the ability to recognize the wheat powdery mildew fungus and evolved into genes controlling dual resistance to wheat powdery mildew and wheat blast.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Cloning of Rmg8 identified on chromosome 2BL in common wheat.
Fig. 2: Cloning of Rmg7 identified on chromosome 2AL in tetraploid wheat.
Fig. 3: Geographical distribution of Rmg8 variants in Europe, the Middle East and Ethiopia.
Fig. 4: Phylogenetic relationships among Rmg8 variants in Triticum and Aegilops.
Fig. 5: Reactions of Rmg8 variants to wheat blast (MoT) and wheat powdery mildew (Bgt) fungi.
Fig. 6: A model illustrating evolutionary processes in which resistance gene Rmg8 has gained new target pathogens through differentiation of variants.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Sequence data were deposited in the GenBank/EMBL database under the accession numbers LC779671, LC779672, LC779673 and LC779674. All plasmids, plant lines and fungal strains used or generated in this work are available from the corresponding author upon request. The databases used in the present study were the reference genome of Chinese Spring (https://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Assemblies) and the reference genome of T. durum cultivar Svevo (https://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_turgidum /Info/Index). Source data are provided with this paper. Any additional data supporting the findings in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Latorre, S. M. et al. Genomic surveillance uncovers a pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002052 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Valent, B. et al. Recovery plan for wheat blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum. Plant Health Prog. 22, 182–212 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tosa, Y. et al. Genetic constitution and pathogenicity of Lolium isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae in comparison with host species-specific pathotypes of the blast fungus. Phytopathology 94, 454–462 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Urashima, A. S., Igarashi, S. & Kato, H. Host range, mating type, and fertility of Pyricularia grisea from wheat in Brazil. Plant Dis. 77, 1211–1216 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Inoue, Y. et al. Evolution of the wheat blast fungus through functional losses in a host specificity determinant. Science 357, 80–83 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Callaway, E. Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time. Nature 532, 421–422 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Islam, M. T. et al. Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a South American lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Biol. 14, 84 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Malaker, P. K. et al. First report of wheat blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum in Bangladesh. Plant Dis. 100, 2330 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tembo, B. et al. Detection and characterization of fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum) causing wheat blast disease on rain-fed grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Zambia. PLoS ONE 15, e0238724 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cruz, C. D. et al. The 2NS translocation from Aegilops ventricosa confers resistance to the Triticum pathotype of Magnaporthe oryzae. Crop Sci. 56, 990–1000 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Helguera, M. et al. PCR assays for the Lr37-Yr17-Sr38 cluster of rust resistance genes and their use to develop isogenic hard red spring wheat lines. Crop Sci. 43, 1839–1847 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cruppe, G. et al. Novel sources of wheat head blast resistance in modern breeding lines and wheat wild relatives. Plant Dis. 104, 35–43 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tagle, A. G., Chuma, I. & Tosa, Y. Rmg7, a new gene for resistance to Triticum isolates of Pyricularia oryzae identified in tetraploid wheat. Phytopathology 105, 495–499 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Anh, V. L. et al. Rmg8, a new gene for resistance to Triticum isolates of Pyricularia oryzae in hexaploid wheat. Phytopathology 105, 1568–1572 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anh, V. L. et al. Rmg8 and Rmg7, wheat genes for resistance to the wheat blast fungus, recognize the same avirulence gene AVR-Rmg8. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 1252–1256 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, S. et al. A new resistance gene in combination with Rmg8 confers strong resistance against Triticum isolates of Pyricularia oryzae in a common wheat landrace. Phytopathology 108, 1299–1306 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimizu, M. et al. A genetically linked pair of NLR immune receptors shows contrasting patterns of evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116896119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sánchez-Martin, J. et al. Wheat Pm4 resistance to powdery mildew is controlled by alternative splice variants encoding chimeric proteins. Nat. Plants 7, 327–341 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Saur, I. M. L., Bauer, S., Lu, X. & Schulze-Lefert, P. A cell death assay in barley and wheat protoplasts for identification and validation of matching pathogen AVR effector and plant NLR immune receptors. Plant Methods 15, 118 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuroda, M., Kimizu, M. & Mikami, C. Simple set of plasmids for the production of transgenic plants. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 74, 2348–2351 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The, T. T., McIntosh, R. A., & Bennett, F. G. A. Cytogenetical studies in wheat. IX. Monosomic analyses, telocentric mapping and linkage relationships of genes Sr21, Pm4 and Mle. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 32, 115–126 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmolke, M., Mohler, V., Hartl, I., Zeller, F. J. & Hsam, S. L. K. A new powdery mildew resistance allele at the Pm4 wheat locus transferred from einkorn (Triticum monococcum). Mol. Breed. 29, 449–456 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Inoue, Y., Vy, T. T. P., Tani, D. & Tosa, Y. Suppression of wheat blast resistance by an effector of Pyricularia oryzae is counteracted by a host specificity resistance gene in wheat. New Phytol. 229, 488–500 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, L.-F. et al. Genome sequences of five Sitopsis species of Aegilops and the origin of polyploid wheat B subgenome. Mol. Plant 15, 488–503 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miki, Y. et al. Origin of wheat B-genome chromosomes inferred from RNA sequencing analysis of leaf transcripts from section Sitopsis species of Aegilops. DNA Res. 26, 171–182 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Briggle, L. W. Near-isogenic lines of wheat with genes for resistance to Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici. Crop Sci. 9, 70–72 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoshioka, Y. et al. Breeding of a near-isogenic wheat line resistant to wheat blast at both seedling and heading stages through incorporation of Rmg8. Phytopathology https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-23-0234-R (2024).

  28. Singh, K. P. et al. Wheat blast: a disease spreading by intercontinental jumps and its management strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 710707 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Asuke, S. et al. Origin and dynamics of Rwt6, a wheat gene for resistance to non-adapted pathotypes of Pyricularia oryzae. Phytopathology 111, 2023–2029 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arora, S. et al. A wheat kinase and immune receptor form host-specificity barriers against the blast fungus. Nat. Plants 9, 385–392 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhan, S. W., Mayama, S. & Tosa, Y. Identification of two genes for resistance to Triticum isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae in wheat. Genome 51, 216–221 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fahima, T. & Coaker, G. Pathogen perception and deception in plant immunity by kinase fusion proteins. Nat. Genet. 55, 908–909 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Hara, T. et al. The wheat powdery mildew resistance gene Pm4 also confers resistance to wheat blast. Nat. Plants (2024); https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.26.559489

  34. Lu, P. et al. A rare gain of function mutation in a wheat tandem kinase confers resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Commun. 11, 680 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Brabham, H. J. et al. Barley MLA3 recognizes the host-specificity determinant Pwl2 from Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Cell https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad266 (2023).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Fu, Y.-B. Characterizing chloroplast genomes and inferring maternal divergence of the TriticumAegilops complex. Sci. Rep. 11, 15363 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gladieux, P. et al. Gene flow between divergent cereal- and grass-specific lineages of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. mBio 9, e01219–17 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang, Y., Asuke, S., Vy, T. T. P., Inoue, Y. & Tosa, Y. Evaluation of durability of blast resistance gene Rmg8 in common wheat based on analyses of its corresponding avirulence gene. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 87, 1–8 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Clayton, W. E. & Renvoize, S. A. Genera Graminum: Grasses of the World. (Kew Publishing, 1986).

  40. Popay, L. Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass). CABI Compendium (2013); https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.31166

  41. CABI. Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass). CABI Compendium (2021); https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.31165

  42. Periyannan, S. et al. The gene Sr33, an ortholog of barley Mla genes, encodes resistance to wheat stem rust race Ug99. Science 341, 786–788 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mago, R. et al. The wheat Sr50 gene reveals rich diversity at a cereal disease resistance locus. Nat. Plants 1, 15186 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bettgenhaeuser, J. et al. The barley immune receptor Mla recognizes multiple pathogens and contributes to host range dynamics. Nat. Commun. 12, 6915 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Horo, J. T., Asuke, S., Vy, T. T. P. & Tosa, Y. Effectiveness of the wheat blast resistance gene Rmg8 in Bangladesh suggested by distribution of an AVR-Rmg8 allele in the Pyricularia oryzae population. Phytopathology 110, 1802–1807 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361, eaar7191 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhu, T. et al. Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly. Plant J. 107, 303–314 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lander, E. S. et al. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1, 174–181 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bushmanova, E., Antipov, D., Lapidus, A. & Prjibelski, A. D. rnaSPAdes: a de novo transcriptome assembler and its application to RNA-Seq data. GigaScience 8, giz100 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ishida, Y., Tsunashima, M., Hiei, Y. & Komari, T. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) transformation using immature embryos. Methods Mol. Biol. 1223, 189–198 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank I. Chuma (Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Japan), K. Nakajima (Mie Prefecture Agricultural Research Institute, Japan), A. Ohta (Kyoto University, Japan), K. Uchihashi (Hyogo Prefectural Technology Center for Agriculture, Japan), H. Tsujimoto (Tottori University, Japan) and T. Kataoka (National Agricultural Research Center for Kyushu Okinawa Region, Japan) for providing powdery-mildewed wheat leaves collected in fields. We also thank T. Islam (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh) for personal communication on field tests of Rmg8 carriers in his country and P. Nicholson (John Innes Centre, UK) for suggestions on the manuscript. Aegilops spp. accessions were provided by the National BioResource Project–Wheat with support in part by the National BioResource Project of the MEXT, Japan. Computations were partially performed on the NIG supercomputer owned by the National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems. This research was supported by the research program on development of innovative technology grants (JPJ007097) from the project of the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN) (provided for Y. Tosa); a grant from Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council Secretariat (International collaborative research project for solving global issues); Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Japan (provided for Y. Tosa); and Kobe University Strategic International Collaborative Research Grant (Type B Fostering Joint Research) (provided for S.A.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.M. performed molecular mapping and crossing of Aegilops accessions. M. Shimizu and R.T. selected transcripts of candidate genes. F.A. and M.K.-K. performed wheat transformation. C.N., Y. Takahashi, M. Shibata, M.Y., M.I., and Z.S. performed screening of germplasms and their molecular analyses. S.N., H.H., M.F., M.T., K.H., N.M., Y.M., and K.K. provided germplasms and scientific advice. S.A. performed the other experiments including the protoplast assay and summarized the data. S.A. and Y. Tosa designed the research and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukio Tosa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Plants thanks Tzion Fahima, Tofazzal Islam, Yinghui Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Search for Rmg8 candidate genes through association analyses of expressed genes with susceptible F2:3 lines.

a, An outline of screening of candidate genes. b, A list of Rmg8 candidate genes. NBS, Nucleotide-binding site; NLR, Nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeat; RLK, Receptor-like kinase.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Reactions of T1 transformants carrying Rmg8-V1 and Rmg8-V2.

T1 individuals derived from transformation of Fielder with the Rmg8-V1 CDS (Fielder+Rmg8-V1) or with Rmg8-V2 CDS (Fielder+Rmg8-V2) were inoculated with Br48, Br48ΔA8, and Br48ΔA8+eI, and incubated for five days. Presence (+)/absence (-) of the transgene confirmed by PCR with the HPT primers are shown below the panels.

Extended Data Fig. 3 PCR products amplified with KM200 primers.

Genomic DNAs of common wheat (S-615, Sch) and tetraploid wheat (St24, Tat14) were subjected to amplification with KM200 primers, and resulting amplicons were run on a 2% gel for 30 min. The 424 bp fragment is amplified from both of the Rmg8 carrier and the Rmg7 carrier, but not from the noncarriers. The 350 bp fragment is amplified from all cultivars/accessions irrespective of their genotypes, and can be used as an indicator of successful PCR reactions.

Source data

Extended Data Table 1 Rmg8 variants detected in local landraces of common wheat
Extended Data Table 2 Segregation of reactions to Br48 in F2 populations derived from crosses between wheat lines
Extended Data Table 3 Distribution of Rmg8 variants in Triticum spp.
Extended Data Table 4 Reactions of representative accessions of Ae. umbellulata, Ae. comosa, and Ae. speltoides to Br48 and its AVR-Rmg8 disruptant (Br48ΔA8)
Extended Data Table 5 Distribution of Rmg8 variants in Aegilops spp.
Extended Data Table 6 Segregation of reactions to Br48 in F2 populations derived from crosses between Aegilops umbellulata accessions
Extended Data Table 7 Reactions of Triticum aestivum lines and Aegilops umbellulata accessions to wheat powdery mildew isolates collected in Japan

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asuke, S., Morita, K., Shimizu, M. et al. Evolution of wheat blast resistance gene Rmg8 accompanied by differentiation of variants recognizing the powdery mildew fungus. Nat. Plants 10, 971–983 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01711-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01711-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing