Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Hybrid epoxy–acrylate resins for wavelength-selective multimaterial 3D printing

Abstract

Structures in nature combine hard and soft materials in precise three-dimensional (3D) arrangements, imbuing bulk properties and functionalities that remain elusive to mimic synthetically. However, the potential for biomimetic analogues to seamlessly interface hard materials with soft interfaces has driven the demand for innovative chemistries and manufacturing approaches. Here, we report a liquid resin for rapid, high-resolution digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing of multimaterial objects with an unprecedented combination of strength, elasticity and resistance to ageing. A covalently bound hybrid epoxy–acrylate monomer precludes plasticization of soft domains, while a wavelength-selective photosensitizer accelerates cationic curing of hard domains. Using dual projection for multicolour DLP 3D printing, bioinspired metamaterial structures are fabricated, including hard springs embedded in a soft cylinder to adjust compressive behaviour and a detailed knee joint featuring ‘bones’ and ‘ligaments’ for smooth motion. Finally, a proof-of-concept device demonstrates selective stretching for electronics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of past and present multimaterial 3D printing strategies.
Fig. 2: Resin components and wavelength-selective curing for multimaterial fabrication.
Fig. 3: Colour-controlled DLP 3D printing and thermomechanical characterization of test bars.
Fig. 4: Resolution and mechanical characterization of 3D-printed multimaterial objects.
Fig. 5: Multimaterial 3D printing of bioinspired mechanical metamaterials.
Fig. 6: Local deformation in multimaterial tensile specimens and application in a stretchable electronic device.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Article and Supplementary Information. Raw data files in other formats are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Ghazlan, A. et al. Inspiration from Nature’s body armours—a review of biological and bioinspired composites. Composites B 205, 108513 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peisker, H., Michels, J. & Gorb, S. N. Evidence for a material gradient in the adhesive tarsal setae of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata. Nat. Commun. 4, 1661 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nazir, A. et al. Multi-material additive manufacturing: a systematic review of design, properties, applications, challenges, and 3D printing of materials and cellular metamaterials. Mater. Des. 226, 111661 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, Y. et al. Recent progress in biomimetic additive manufacturing technology: from materials to functional structures. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706539 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Studart, A. R. Additive manufacturing of biologically-inspired materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 359–376 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montgomery, S. M., Demoly, F., Zhou, K. & Qi, H. J. Pixel-level grayscale manipulation to improve accuracy in digital light processing 3D printing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2213252 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bomar 3D Printing https://bomar-chem.com/markets/3d-printing (2025).

  8. Carbon 3D Printing Materials for Real-World Applications https://www.carbon3d.com/materials (2025).

  9. Mora, S., Pugno, N. M. & Misseroni, D. 3D printed architected lattice structures by material jetting. Mater. Today 59, 107–132 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Skylar-Scott, M. A., Mueller, J., Visser, C. W. & Lewis, J. A. Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature 575, 330–335 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kokkinis, D., Bouville, F. & Studart, A. R. 3D printing of materials with tunable failure via bioinspired mechanical gradients. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705808 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, L. et al. Multimaterial 3D printing of highly stretchable silicone elastomers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 23573–23583 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mirzaali, M. J. et al. Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft–hard composites made by multi-material 3D printing. Compos. Struct. 237, 111867 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buchner, T. J. K. et al. Vision-controlled jetting for composite systems and robots. Nature 623, 522–530 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, X. et al. Integrating digital light processing with direct ink writing for hybrid 3D printing of functional structures and devices. Addit. Manuf. 40, 101911 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Armstrong, C. D. et al. A hybrid additive manufacturing process for production of functional fiber-reinforced polymer composite structures. J. Compos. Mater. 57, 841–850 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ge, Q. et al. 3D printing of highly stretchable hydrogel with diverse UV curable polymers. Sci. Adv. 7, eaba4261 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, Z. et al. Additive manufacturing of two-phase lightweight, stiff and high damping carbon fiber reinforced polymer microlattices. Addit. Manuf. 32, 101106 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng, J. et al. Centrifugal multimaterial 3D printing of multifunctional heterogeneous objects. Nat. Commun. 13, 7931 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Han, D., Yang, C., Fang, N. X. & Lee, H. Rapid multi-material 3D printing with projection micro-stereolithography using dynamic fluidic control. Addit. Manuf. 27, 606–615 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yue, L. et al. Single-vat single-cure grayscale digital light processing 3D printing of materials with large property difference and high stretchability. Nat. Commun. 14, 1251 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuang, X. et al. Grayscale digital light processing 3D printing for highly functionally graded materials. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav5790 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, S. et al. One-pot ternary sequential reactions for photopatterned gradient multimaterials. Matter 6, 2419–2438 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, Y. et al. Multimaterial thermoset synthesis: switching polymerization mechanism with light dosage. ACS Cent. Sci. 10, 2125–2131 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz, J. J. & Boydston, A. J. Multimaterial actinic spatial control 3D and 4D printing. Nat. Commun. 10, 791 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cazin, I. et al. Spatially controlling the mechanical properties of 3D printed objects by dual-wavelength vat photopolymerization. Addit. Manuf. 57, 102977 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rossegger, E. et al. Wavelength selective multi-material 3D printing of soft active devices using orthogonal photoreactions. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 44, 2200586 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaca, S., Dietliker, K., Rossegger, E. & Schlögl, S. Design of photocurable thiol–epoxy resins for the processing of vitrimers with vat photopolymerisation 3D printing. React. Funct. Polym. 205, 106085 (2024).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu, C., Gemeda, H. B., Duoss, E. B. & Spadaccini, C. M. Toward multiscale, multimaterial 3D printing. Adv. Mater. 36, 2314204 (2024).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, J. et al. 3D-printed anisotropic polymer materials for functional applications. Adv. Mater. 34, 2102877 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wallin, T. J., Pikul, J. & Shepherd, R. F. 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 84–100 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abueidda, D. W. et al. Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric gyroid cellular structures: experimental and finite element study. Mater. Des. 165, 107597 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Farzaneh, A., Pawar, N., Portela, C. M. & Hopkins, J. B. Sequential metamaterials with alternating Poisson’s ratios. Nat. Commun. 13, 1041 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ubaid, J., Schneider, J., Deshpande, V. S., Wardle, B. L. & Kumar, S. Multifunctionality of nanoengineered self-sensing lattices enabled by additive manufacturing. Adv. Eng. Mater. 24, 2200194 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Geiger, F., Kebbach, M., Vogel, D., Weissmann, V. & Bader, R. Efficient computer-based method for adjusting the stiffness of subject-specific 3D-printed insoles during walking. Appl. Sci. 13, 3854 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dwyer, C. M. et al. Impact performance of 3D printed spatially varying elastomeric lattices. Polymers 15, 1178 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Libanori, R. et al. Stretchable heterogeneous composites with extreme mechanical gradients. Nat. Commun. 3, 1265 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wei, R. et al. Revolutionizing wearable technology: advanced fabrication techniques for body-conformable electronics. npj Flex. Electron. 8, 83 (2024).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ehrmann, K. & Barner-Kowollik, C. Colorful 3D printing: a critical feasibility analysis of multi-wavelength additive manufacturing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 24438–24446 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lu, P. et al. Wavelength-selective light–matter interactions in polymer science. Matter 4, 2172–2229 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Boynton, N. R. et al. Accessing pluripotent materials through tempering of dynamic covalent polymer networks. Science 383, 545–551 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma, Y. et al. Photoswitching cationic and radical polymerizations: spatiotemporal control of thermoset properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 21200–21205 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shanmugam, S., Cuthbert, J., Kowalewski, T., Boyer, C. & Matyjaszewski, K. Catalyst-free selective photoactivation of RAFT polymerization: a facile route for preparation of comblike and bottlebrush polymers. Macromolecules 51, 7776–7784 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu, J., Shanmugam, S., Fu, C., Aguey-Zinsou, K. F. & Boyer, C. Selective photoactivation: from a single unit monomer insertion reaction to controlled polymer architectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3094–3106 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao, Y., Ma, M., Lin, X. & Chen, M. Photoorganocatalyzed divergent reversible-deactivation radical polymerization towards linear and branched fluoropolymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 21470–21474 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Frisch, H., Marschner, D. E., Goldmann, A. S. & Barner-Kowollik, C. Wavelength-gated dynamic covalent chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 2036–2045 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Van De Walle, M., De Bruycker, K., Blinco, J. P. & Barner-Kowollik, C. Two colour photoflow chemistry for macromolecular design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 14143–14147 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bialas, S. et al. Access to disparate soft matter materials by curing with two colors of light. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807288 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dolinski, N. D. et al. Solution Mask Liquid Lithography (SMaLL) for one-step, multimaterial 3D printing. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800364 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mantri, S. P. & Mantri, S. S. Management of shrinkage stresses in direct restorative light-cured composites: a review. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 25, 305–313 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Soares, C. J. et al. Polymerization shrinkage stress of composite resins and resin cements—what do we need to know? Braz. Oral Res. 31, e62 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ha, N. S. & Lu, G. A review of recent research on bio-inspired structures and materials for energy absorption applications. Composites B 181, 107496 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Guy, N., Giani, O., Blanquer, S., Pinaud, J. & Robin, J.-J. Photoinduced ring-opening polymerizations. Prog. Org. Coat. 153, 106159 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Dolinski, N. D. et al. Tough multimaterial interfaces through wavelength-selective 3D printing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 22065–22072 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Arivazhagan, G., Elangovan, A., Shanmugam, R., Vijayalakshmi, R. & Karthick, N. K. Study of molecular interaction in the mixtures of benzene + methyl acrylate/butyl acrylate through dielectric and spectroscopic studies. J. Mol. Liq. 214, 357–363 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. González, M. G., Cabanelas, J. C. & Baselga, J. in Infrared Spectroscopy—Materials Science, Engineering and Technology (ed. Theophile, T.) 261–284 (IntechOpen, 2012).

  57. Creton, C., Hu, G., Deplace, F., Morgret, L. & Shull, K. R. Large-strain mechanical behavior of model block copolymer adhesives. Macromolecules 42, 7605–7615 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang, H. et al. Strain induced nanocavitation and crystallization in natural rubber probed by real time small and wide angle X-ray scattering. J. Polym. Sci. B 51, 1125–1138 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Allen, M. J. et al. Multimorphic materials: spatially tailoring mechanical properties via selective initiation of interpenetrating polymer networks. Adv. Mater. 35, 2210208 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rylski, A. K. et al. Polymeric multimaterials by photochemical patterning of crystallinity. Science 378, 211–215 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Abraham, A. C., Pauly, H. M. & Haut Donahue, T. L. Deleterious effects of osteoarthritis on the structure and function of the meniscal enthesis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 22, 275–283 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lu, J. et al. Hierarchically mimicking outer tooth enamel for restorative mechanical compatibility. Nat. Commun. 15, 10182 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Miserez, A., Schneberk, T., Sun, C., Zok, F. W. & Waite, J. H. The transition from stiff to compliant materials in squid beaks. Science 319, 1816–1819 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Passi, V. et al. Note: Fast and reliable fracture strain extraction technique applied to silicon at nanometer scale. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 116106 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge primary support from the Department of Defense under grant W911NF2210115 (J.-W.K., M.J.A., E.A.R., L.M.S., H.L.C., A.U., Z.A.P.; compositional, optical, mechanical and thermal characterization, and materials and supplies). Partial support was provided by the Robert A. Welch Foundation under grants F-2007 (J.-W.K., A.U., Z.A.P.; synthesis) and F-2210 (A.J.A., G.E.S.; digital image correlation and rheology), National Science Foundation (NSF) Directorate for Engineering under grant 2229036 (A.G., W.E., M.A.C.; FEA and electronic device fabrication and testing), US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences through the Center for Materials for Water and Energy Systems (M-WET), an Energy Frontier Research Center under award DE-SC0019272 (M.J.A., B.D.F.; nanoindentation characterization), NSF Graduate Research Fellowship under grant DGE-1610403 (M.J.A.) and Research Corporation for Science Advancement under award 28184 (Z.A.P.). The authors thank J. Rawlins at the University of Southern Mississippi for discussions on standardized aging conditions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-W.K., M.J.A., Z.A.P.; methodology, J.-W.K., M.J.A., E.A.R., L.M.S., H.L.C., A.U., A.G., W.E., A.J.A.; investigation, J.-W.K., M.J.A., E.A.R., L.M.S., H.L.C., A.U., A.G., W.E., A.J.A.; visualization, J.-W.K., M.J.A., E.A.R., Z.A.P.; funding acquisition, G.E.S., M.A.C., B.D.F., Z.A.P.; project administration, Z.A.P.; supervision, G.E.S., M.A.C., B.D.F., Z.A.P.; writing—original draft, J.-W.K., M.J.A., Z.A.P.; writing—review and editing, J.-W.K., M.J.A., E.A.R., L.M.S., H.L.C., A.U., A.G., W.E., A.J.A., G.E.S., M.A.C., B.D.F., Z.A.P.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachariah A. Page.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Z.A.P., M.J.A. and J.-W.K. have filed an international patent (application no. PCT/US2024/035169) related to this work. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Materials thanks Thomas Wallin and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Experimental Methods, Characterization, Figs. 1–83, Tables 1–21, Schemes 1 and 2 and Videos 1–15.

Supplementary Video 1

Uniaxial compression of a ‘soft cylinder (no spring)’ structure at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 50 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 62.

Supplementary Video 2

Uniaxial compression of a ‘concentric twisted’ structure containing a hard spring (0.9-mm diameter, 4-mm pitch) within a soft cylinder at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 50 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 62.

Supplementary Video 3

Uniaxial compression of a ‘concentric twisted’ structure containing a hard spring (0.9-mm diameter, 3-mm pitch) within a soft cylinder at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 50 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 62.

Supplementary Video 4

Uniaxial compression of a ‘concentric twisted’ structure containing a hard spring (0.9-mm diameter, 2-mm pitch) within a soft cylinder at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 50 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 62.

Supplementary Video 5

Uniaxial compression of a ‘hard spring (no cylinder)’ structure (0.9-mm diameter, 3-mm pitch) at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 0.5 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Fig. 5a inset.

Supplementary Video 6

Uniaxial compression of a ‘concentric twisted’ structure containing a hard spring (0.5-mm diameter, 4-mm pitch) within a soft cylinder at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 50 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Supplementary Fig. 63.

Supplementary Video 7

Uniaxial compression of a ‘concentric twisted’ structure containing a hard spring (0.5-mm diameter, 3-mm pitch) within a soft cylinder at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 50 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Supplementary Fig. 63.

Supplementary Video 8

Uniaxial compression of a ‘concentric twisted’ structure containing a hard spring (0.5-mm diameter, 2-mm pitch) within a soft cylinder at a compression rate of 10 µm min−1 until 50 N was reached. The video is played back at 30× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Supplementary Fig. 63.

Supplementary Video 9

Manual unidirectional bending and recovery of a ‘knee joint’ structure over four cycles followed by the removal of force. The video is played back at 2× speed. Details of 3D structure can be found in Fig. 5b and Supplementary Figs. 66 and 67.

Supplementary Video 10

Uniaxial stretching of a ‘brick-and-mortar’ structure at a strain rate of 10 mm min−1 until macroscopic failure. The video is played back at 2× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Supplementary Figs. 68 and 69.

Supplementary Video 11

DIC for the ‘1,000× modulus central insert’ sample, showing the localized strain distribution under cyclic stretching to a global strain of 30% at a tensile rate of 5 mm min−1. The samples were spray-coated to facilitate DIC analysis. The video is played back at 60× speed.

Supplementary Video 12

DIC for the ‘100× modulus central insert’ sample, showing the localized strain distribution under cyclic stretching to a global strain of 30% at a tensile rate of 5 mm min−1. The samples were spray-coated to facilitate DIC analysis. The video is played back at 60× speed.

Supplementary Video 13

DIC for the ‘10× modulus central insert’ sample, showing the localized strain distribution under cyclic stretching to a global strain of 30% at a tensile rate of 5 mm min−1. The samples were spray-coated to facilitate DIC analysis. The video is played back at 60× speed.

Supplementary Video 14

Uniaxial stretching of a ‘multimaterial device with 1× insert’ structure bearing a white LED at a tensile rate of 5 mm min−1, with global strain reaching 30% over 10 repeated cycles. The video is played back at 60× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Fig. 6d.

Supplementary Video 15

Uniaxial stretching of a ‘multimaterial device with 1,000× insert’ structure bearing a white LED at a tensile rate of 5 mm min−1, with global strain reaching 30% over 10 repeated cycles. The video is played back at 60× speed. Details of the 3D structure can be found in Fig. 6d of the main manuscript.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data for Fig. 1c.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data for Fig. 2b–d.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data for Fig. 3b–d.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data for Fig. 4b–d.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data for Fig. 5a.

Source Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data for Fig. 6b,c.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JW., Allen, M.J., Recker, E.A. et al. Hybrid epoxy–acrylate resins for wavelength-selective multimaterial 3D printing. Nat. Mater. 24, 1116–1125 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02249-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02249-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing