Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Orbital hybridization in graphene-based artificial atoms

Abstract

Intra-atomic orbital hybridization and interatomic bond formation are the two fundamental processes when real atoms are condensed to form matter1,2. Artificial atoms mimic real atoms by demonstrating discrete energy levels attributable to quantum confinement3,4,5,6,7,8. As such, they offer a solid-state analogue for simulating intra-atomic orbital hybridization and interatomic bond formation. Signatures of interatomic bond formation have been extensively observed in various artificial atoms9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. However, direct evidence of the intra-atomic orbital hybridization in the artificial atoms remains to be experimentally demonstrated. Here we realize the orbital hybridization in artificial atoms by altering the shape of the artificial atoms. The anisotropy of the confining potential gives rise to the hybridization between quasibound states with different orbital quantum numbers within the artificial atom. These hybridized orbits are directly visualized in real space in our experiment and are well reproduced by both numerical calculations and analytical derivations. Our study opens an avenue for designing artificial matter that cannot be accessed on real atoms through experiments. Moreover, the results obtained inspire the progressive control of quantum states in diverse systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Orbital hybridization in natural atoms and artificial atoms.
Fig. 2: Experimental observation of hybridized orbitals.
Fig. 3: Energy splitting of hybridized states versus anisotropy degree.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Codes are provided in the Supplementary information.

References

  1. Brown, T. L. et al. Chemistry: The Central Science (Pearson, 2015).

  2. Oxtoby, D. W., Gillis, H. P. & Butler, L. J. Principles of Modern Chemistry (Cengage Learning, 2016).

  3. Kouwenhoven, L. P., Austing, D. G. & Tarucha, S. Few-electron quantum dots. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 701–736 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reimann, S. M. & Manninen, M. Electronic structure of quantum dots. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1283–1342 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Buluta, I., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 104401 (2011).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashoori, R. C. Electrons in artificial atoms. Nature 379, 413–419 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Loss, D. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A 57, 120–126 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Karrai, K. et al. Hybridization of electronic states in quantum dots through photon emission. Nature 427, 135–138 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schedelbeck, G., Wegscheider, W., Bichler, M. & Abstreiter, G. Coupled quantum dots fabricated by cleaved edge overgrowth: from artificial atoms to molecules. Science 278, 1792–1795 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oosterkamp, T. H. et al. Microwave spectroscopy of a quantum-dot molecule. Nature 395, 873–876 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayer, M. et al. Coupling and entangling of quantum states in quantum dot molecules. Science 291, 451–453 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Krenner, H. J. et al. Direct observation of controlled coupling in an individual quantum dot molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 057402 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodary, G. et al. Real space observation of electronic coupling between self-assembled quantum dots. Nano Lett. 19, 3699–3706 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu, Z.-Q. et al. Relativistic artificial molecules realized by two coupled graphene quantum dots. Nano Lett. 20, 6738–6743 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dou, W. et al. High-yield production of quantum corrals in a surface reconstruction pattern. Nano Lett. 23, 148–154 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ge, Z. et al. Giant orbital magnetic moments and paramagnetic shift in artificial relativistic atoms and molecules. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 250–256 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng, Q. et al. Molecular collapse states in graphene/WSe2 heterostructure quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 076202 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silvestrov, P. G. & Efetov, K. B. Quantum dots in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 016802 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pereira, V. M., Nilsson, J. & Castro Neto, A. H. Coulomb impurity problem in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 166802 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matulis, A. & Peeters, F. M. Quasibound states of quantum dots in single and bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 115423 (2008).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Y. et al. Observing atomic collapse resonances in artificial nuclei on graphene. Science 340, 734–737 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, Y. et al. Creating and probing electron whispering-gallery modes in graphene. Science 348, 672–675 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Freitag, N. M. et al. Electrostatically confined monolayer graphene quantum dots with orbital and valley splittings. Nano Lett. 16, 5798–5805 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutiérrez, C., Brown, L., Kim, C.-J., Park, J. & Pasupathy, A. N. Klein tunnelling and electron trapping in nanometre-scale graphene quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 12, 1069–1075 (2016).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, J. et al. Imaging electrostatically confined Dirac fermions in graphene quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 12, 1032–1036 (2016).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghahari, F. et al. An on/off Berry phase switch in circular graphene resonators. Science 356, 845–849 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang, Y. et al. Tuning a circular p–n junction in graphene from quantum confinement to optical guiding. Nat. Nanotech. 12, 1045–1049 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Bai, K.-K. et al. Generating atomically sharp p–n junctions in graphene and testing quantum electron optics on the nanoscale. Phys. Rev. B 97, 045413 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutiérrez, C. et al. Interaction-driven quantum Hall wedding cake-like structures in graphene quantum dots. Science 361, 789–794 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng, Q., Zhuang, Y.-C., Sun, Q.-F. & He, L. Coexistence of electron whispering-gallery modes and atomic collapse states in graphene/WSe2 heterostructure quantum dots. Nat. Commun. 13, 1597 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ren, H.-Y., Ren, Y.-N., Zheng, Q., He, J.-Q. & He, L. Electron-electron interaction and correlation-induced two density waves with different Fermi velocities in graphene quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 108, L081408 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Ren, H.-Y., Mao, Y., Ren, Y.-N., Sun, Q.-F. & He, L. Tunable quantum confinement in individual nanoscale quantum dots via interfacial engineering. ACS Nano 19, 1352–1360 (2025).

  33. Zhang, J. et al. Double quantum dots in atomically-precise graphene nanoribbons. Mater. Quantum. Technol. 3, 036201 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Banszerus, L. et al. Single-electron double quantum dots in bilayer graphene. Nano Lett. 20, 2005–2011 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Garreis, R. et al. Long-lived valley states in bilayer graphene quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 20, 428–434 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tong, C. et al. Pauli blockade of tunable two-electron spin and valley states in graphene quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 067702 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, H., Kim, S. W., Chhowalla, M. & Lee, Y. H. Structural and quantum-state phase transitions in van der Waals layered materials. Nat. Phys. 13, 931–937 (2017).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, R. et al. Strategies on phase control in transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1802473 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Huang, H. H., Fan, X., Singh, D. J. & Zheng, W. T. Recent progress of TMD nanomaterials: phase transitions and applications. Nanoscale 12, 1247–1268 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Yin, X. et al. Recent developments in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: phase transition and applications of the (quasi-)metallic phases. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 10087–10115 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Ren, Y.-N. et al. In situ creation and tailoring of interfacial quantum dots in graphene/transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 110, 125416 (2024).

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou, X.-F. et al. Relativistic artificial molecule of two coupled graphene quantum dots at tunable distances. Nat. Commun. 15, 8786 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Shytov, A. V., Katsnelson, M. I. & Levitov, L. S. Atomic collapse and quasi-Rydberg states in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246802 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Moldovan, D., Masir, M. R. & Peeters, F. M. Magnetic field dependence of the atomic collapse state in graphene. 2D Mater. 5, 015017 (2017).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Morgenstern, M. et al. Origin of Landau oscillations observed in scanning tunneling spectroscopy on n-InAs(110). Phys. Rev. B 62, 7257–7263 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key R and D Programme of China (grant nos. 2024YFA1409002, 2021YFA1400100 and 2021YFA1401900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 12374034, 11921005, 12141401, 12425405 and 12404198), the Innovation Programme for Quantum Science and Technology (grant no. 2021ZD0302403), ‘the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities’ (grant no. 310400209521), the China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (grant no. BX20240040) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2023M740296). The computational resources are supported by High-performance Computing Platform of Peking University. The devices were fabricated using the transfer platform from Shanghai Onway Technology Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.H. and Q.-F.S. conceived the work and designed the research strategy. Y.M. carried out the analytical analysis and numerical calculations under the supervision of Q.-F.S. H.-Y.R., X.-F.Z. and Y.-N.R. fabricated the samples and performed the measurements. H.-Y.R., Y.-N.R., H.S., Y.-H.X. and L.H. analysed the experimental data. Y.M., Y.-C.Z. and Q.-F.S. analysed the numerical data. All authors wrote the paper together.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ya-Ning Ren, Lin He or Qing-Feng Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Florian Libisch and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Analytical and numerical LDOS of quasibound states (0, 1) and (1, 1).

a and b. The distribution of states (0, 1) and (1, 1), respectively. Left panel: The LDOS maps from the analytically solved wavefunctions. Middle panel: The numerically calculated LDOS maps for a circular QD. Right panel: The numerically calculated LDOS maps for an elliptical QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Almost unhybridized orbital states under an almost circular confinement with dr′ = 0.03.

a. Left panel: A STM image (Vb = 600 mV, I = 130 pA) of the almost circular QD with anisotropy degree \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=\,0.03\) embedded in the graphene/WSe2 heterostructure. The radius \({r}_{0}\approx 9\,{\rm{nm}}\). The yellow dashed line shows outline of the circular QD. The height profile along the red dashed line is shown with solid red line. Top right panels: Atomic-resolved STM image on (1 T’ phase) and off (2H phase) the QD, respectively. Bottom right panels: The FFT image obtained from the STM image on and off the QD, respectively. The white and green circles show reciprocal lattices of graphene and WSe2, respectively. The unlabeled bright spots correspond to the reciprocal moiré superlattices and higher-order scattering. b. The dI/dV spectroscopic map versus the spatial position along axis of the almost circular QD. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The first four states are labelled by wavefunctions and black dashed lines. The two yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Hybridized orbital states under an elliptical confinement with dr′ = 0.07.

a. A STM image (Vb = 600 mV, I = 100 pA) of the elliptical QD with anisotropy degree \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=\,0.07\) embedded in the graphene/WSe2 heterostructure. The minor radius r1 is approximately 12.5 nm, and the major radius r2 is approximately 14.5 nm. The height profile along the red dashed line is shown with solid red line. b. The dI/dV spectroscopic maps versus the spatial position along the major axis (left panel) and minor axis (right panel) of the elliptical QD, respectively. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The first four states are labelled by wavefunctions and black dashed lines in the right panel. The yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD. c. dI/dV maps of different orbital states. For an elliptical confinement, the anisotropy of confining potential results in orbital hybridization between the s-orbital and d-orbital states, giving rise to new states sd+ \({\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\) and sd- \(-\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+{\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\), which exhibit θ-shaped and rotated θ-shaped features marked by the green dotted lines, respectively. The yellow dashed lines show outlines of the elliptical QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Hybridized orbital states under an elliptical confinement with dr′ = 0.08.

a. A STM image (Vb = 450 mV, I = 300 pA) of the elliptical QD with anisotropy degree \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=\,0.08\) embedded in the graphene/WSe2 heterostructure. The minor radius r1 is approximately 6 nm, and the major radius r2 is approximately 7 nm. The height profile along the red dashed line is shown with solid red line. b. The \(-{d}^{3}I/{{dV}}^{3}\) spectroscopic maps versus the spatial position along the major axis (left panel) and minor axis (right panel) of the elliptical QD, respectively. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The first four states are labelled by wavefunctions and black dashed lines in the right panel. The yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Hybridized orbital states under an elliptical confinement with dr′ = 0.16.

a. The dI/dV spectroscopic map versus the spatial position along the major axis of the elliptical QD in Fig. 2c. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The two yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Hybridized orbital states under an elliptical confinement with dr′ = 0.17.

a. Left panel: A STM image (Vb = 500 mV, I = 100 pA) of the elliptical QD with anisotropy degree \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=\,0.17\) embedded in the graphene/WSe2 heterostructure. The minor radius r1 is approximately 7.6 nm, and the major radius r2 is approximately 10.7 nm. The height profile along the red dashed line is shown with solid red line. Top right panels: Atomic-resolved STM image on (1 T’ phase) and off (2H phase) the QD, respectively. Bottom right panels: The FFT image obtained from the STM image on and off the QD, respectively. The white and green circles show reciprocal lattices of graphene and WSe2, respectively. The unlabeled bright spots correspond to the reciprocal moiré superlattices and higher-order scattering. b. The dI/dV spectroscopic maps versus the spatial position along the major axis (left panel) and minor axis (right panel) of the elliptical QD, respectively. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The first four states are labelled by wavefunctions and black dashed lines in the right panel. The yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD. c. dI/dV maps of different orbital states. For an elliptical confinement, the anisotropy of confining potential results in orbital hybridization between the s-orbital and d-orbital states, giving rise to new states sd+ \({\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\) and sd- \(-\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+{\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\), which exhibit θ-shaped and rotated θ-shaped features marked by the green dotted lines, respectively. The yellow dashed lines show outlines of the elliptical QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Hybridized orbital states under an elliptical confinement with dr′ = 0.18.

a. Left panel: A STM image (Vb = 400 mV, I = 120 pA) of the elliptical QD with anisotropy degree \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=\,0.18\) embedded in the graphene/MoSe2 heterostructure. The minor radius r1 is approximately 8.4 nm, and the major radius r2 is approximately 12.1 nm. The height profile along the red dashed line is shown with solid red line. Top right panels: Atomic-resolved STM image on (1 T’ phase) and off (2H phase) the QD, respectively. Bottom right panels: The FFT image obtained from the STM image on and off the QD, respectively. The white and green circles show reciprocal lattices of graphene and MoSe2, respectively. The unlabeled bright spots correspond to the reciprocal moiré superlattices and higher-order scattering. b. The dI/dV spectroscopic map versus the spatial position along the major axis of the elliptical QD. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The two yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD. c. dI/dV maps of different orbital states. For an elliptical confinement, the anisotropy of confining potential results in orbital hybridization between the s-orbital and d-orbital states, giving rise to new states sd+ \({\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\) and sd- \(-\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+{\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\), which exhibit θ-shaped and rotated θ-shaped features marked by the green dotted lines, respectively. The yellow dashed lines show outlines of the elliptical QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Hybridized orbital states under an elliptical confinement with dr′ = 0.19.

a. Left panel: A STM image (Vb = 500 mV, I = 100 pA) of the elliptical QD with anisotropy degree \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=\,0.19\) embedded in the graphene/WSe2 heterostructure. The minor radius r1 is approximately 7.6 nm, and the major radius r2 is approximately 11.2 nm. The height profile along the red dashed line is shown with solid red line. Top right panels: Atomic-resolved STM image on (1 T’ phase) and off (2H phase) the QD, respectively. Bottom right panels: The FFT image obtained from the STM image on and off the QD, respectively. The white and green circles show reciprocal lattices of graphene and WSe2, respectively. The unlabeled bright spots correspond to the reciprocal moiré superlattices and higher-order scattering. b. The dI/dV spectroscopic map versus the spatial position along the major axis of the elliptical QD. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The two yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD. c. dI/dV maps of different orbital states. For an elliptical confinement, the anisotropy of confining potential results in orbital hybridization between the s-orbital and d-orbital states, giving rise to new states sd+ \({\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\) and sd- \(-\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+{\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\), which exhibit θ-shaped and rotated θ-shaped features marked by the green dotted lines, respectively. The yellow dashed lines show outlines of the elliptical QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Hybridized orbital states under an elliptical confinement with dr′ = 0.21.

a. A STM image (Vb = −140 mV, I = 150 pA) of the elliptical QD with anisotropy degree \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=\,0.21\) embedded in the graphene/WSe2 heterostructure. The minor radius r1 is approximately 7.8 nm, and the major radius r2 is approximately 12 nm. b. The dI/dV spectroscopic map versus the spatial position along the minor axis of the elliptical QD. Orbital states can be clearly observed in the QD. The first four states are labelled by wavefunctions and black dashed lines. The two yellow dashed lines mark the size of the QD. c. dI/dV maps of different orbital states. For an elliptical confinement, the anisotropy of confining potential results in orbital hybridization between the s-orbital and d-orbital states, giving rise to new states sd+ \({\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\) and sd- \(-\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+{\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\), which exhibit θ-shaped and rotated θ-shaped features marked by the green dotted lines, respectively. The yellow dashed lines show outlines of the elliptical QD.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 10 LDOS evolution of hybridized states from s2 (0, 2) and d1 (2, 1).

From the leftmost panel to the rightmost panel: \({{dr}}^{{\prime} }=0,0.05,0.10,0.15,0.20\), the other parameters are the same and shown in Supplementary information. a1-a5. The space-energy LDOS for the five potentials, along the minor axis of ellipse. The red, yellow, green, and blue color bars respectively indicate the energy of quasibound states s1, p1, sd+ , sd-. b1-b5, c1-c5. The numerically calculated spatial distributions of hybridized states sd+ , sd- evolved as the QD is deformed from circle to ellipse. d1-d5, e1-e5. The spatial distributions of sd+ and sd- obtained from the combination of analytical wavefunctions \({\psi }_{{sd}+}={\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\) and \({\psi }_{{sd}-}=-\alpha {\psi }_{(\mathrm{0,2})}+{\psi }_{(\mathrm{2,1})}\). From left to right: α = 0.0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9.

Source Data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Notes 1–7, figures, Table 1, codes and references.

Peer Review File

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, Y., Ren, HY., Zhou, XF. et al. Orbital hybridization in graphene-based artificial atoms. Nature 639, 73–78 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08620-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08620-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing