Fig. 3: Comparative values of selected performance indicators for cervical cancer screening programs that provided data to the CanScreen5 project. | Nature Medicine

Fig. 3: Comparative values of selected performance indicators for cervical cancer screening programs that provided data to the CanScreen5 project.

From: CanScreen5, a global repository for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programs

Fig. 3

The reporting format is country or region, reporting year and screening protocol. Cyto, cytology. aCuba: examination coverage might be slightly overestimated because some participants outside the screening program were screened. bRepublic of Korea: women with a previous diagnosis of cancer before the examination date were excluded from these screen-related data. cCôte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Morocco, Guyana, Mexico: the target population is not the total of individuals eleigible for screening (based on age); the project in Guyana is at the rolling out phase. dHungary: colposcopy was a substantial part of the screening primary visit. eNicaragua and Australia: the detection rate was only for CIN 3+. fBangladesh, Republic of Korea: the detection rate was only for cervical cancer.

Back to article page