Extended Data Fig. 7: ROC curve analyses for regression and necrosis (PT) and combined %RVT plus necrosis (PT) in the path-evaluable patient population. | Nature Medicine

Extended Data Fig. 7: ROC curve analyses for regression and necrosis (PT) and combined %RVT plus necrosis (PT) in the path-evaluable patient population.

From: Association between pathologic response and survival after neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer

Extended Data Fig. 7

a, ROC curve analysis of 2-year EFS rate by %regression-PT for patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy. AUC = 0.76, similar to that for %RVT-PT. b, ROC curve analysis of 2-year EFS rate by %regression + necrosis-PT for patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy; points are labeled as ‘(%regression-PT, %necrosis-PT)’. Addition of %necrosis-PT to %regression-PT did not increase AUC. c, ROC curve analysis of 2-year EFS rate by %regression-PT for patients treated with chemotherapy. d, ROC curve analysis of 2-year EFS rate by %regression + necrosis-PT for patients treated with chemotherapy; points are labeled as ‘(%regression-PT, %necrosis-PT)’. Considering necrosis may be a tumor-intrinsic parameter, it was combined with %RVT-PT in patients receiving nivolumab plus chemotherapy (e), and in patients receiving chemotherapy (f). However, %RVT + necrosis-PT did not greatly alter the AUC achieved with %RVT-PT alone. Points are labeled as ‘(%RVT-PT, %necrosis-PT)’. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy arm, n = 141; chemotherapy arm, n = 126. EFS denotes event-free survival; PT, primary tumor; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; RVT, residual viable tumor. aThe solid square is the optimal cutoff, which is the difference between the true positive rate and false positive rate over all possible cutoff values.

Back to article page