Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55125-2, published online 29 February 2024

The original version of this Article contained errors in Figure 4. In the legends for panels a and b the ‘ ≤ ’ and ‘ ≥ ’ signs did not display correctly.

The original Figure 4 and accompanying legend appear below.

Figure 4
figure 4

Active tACS treatment is more effective in younger and cognitively weaker participants. (a) In the active tACS group (upper right plot), older adults of younger age (≤ 68 years, light blue line, n = 18) revealed higher offline visuomotor learning than those of older age (> 68 years, purple line, n = 17) 3 months after treatment completion, whereas in the sham tACS group (upper left plot), both age groups showed the same level of offline visuomotor learning 3 months after treatment. (b) In the active tACS group (lower right plot), participants with MoCA (i.e. Montreal Cognitive Assessment) scores in the range of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) (< 26, orange line, n = 17) revealed higher offline visuomotor learning than participants with MoCA scores in the healthy range (≥ 26, dark green line, n = 18) 3 months after treatment completion, whereas in the sham tACS group (lower left plot), both cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired participants exhibited the same level of offline visuomotor learning 3 months after treatment. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM).

The original Article has been corrected.