Table 11 Car side impact design.

From: Multiple strategies improved spider wasp optimization for engineering optimization problem solving

 

MISWO

SWO

AOA

GWO

HHO

WOA

PSO

WSO

CHIO

\(x_1\)

0.5000

0.5009

0.5000

0.5000

0.5003

0.5000

0.5000

0.5000

0.658099

\(x_2\)

1.1164

1.1476

1.2293

1.1227

1.2098

1.0759

1.3050

1.1164

0.680929

\(x_3\)

0.5000

0.5076

0.5000

0.5000

0.5003

0.7438

0.5000

0.5000

1.171933

\(x_4\)

1.3020

1.2632

1.2632

1.2944

1.2284

0.5402

1.0819

1.3022

1.429388

\(x_5\)

0.5000

0.5020

0.5199

0.5000

0.5024

0.5000

0.5000

0.5000

1.231596

\(x_6\)

1.5000

1.4853

1.5000

1.5000

1.4995

1.5000

0.5000

1.5000

0.90368

\(x_7\)

0.5000

0.5007

0.0001

0.5000

0.5003

0.5000

0.5000

0.5000

0.657570

\(x_8\)

0.6877

0.6589

0.0001

0.9166

0.1405

0.0000

1

0.54191

0.919579

\(x_9\)

0.1955

0.2365

0.0000

0.1798

0.0000

0.0000

1

0.00568

0.569743

\(x_10\)

-19.5440

-13.7161

-0.0006

-18.4229

-2.8166

-30.000

14.1849

-19.5615

25.3801

\(x_11\)

7.07e-07

-2.2079

-0.0045

1.7886

-4.0909

0.0943

18.5938

4.65e-07

22.6671

f(x)

22.8429691

22.9596

23.3350

23.2178

23.2383

23.2115

22.84329

22.8429695

22.85021600

  1. Comparison of optimization results for car side impact design.