Introduction

One of the important challenges in the synthesis of modern organic compounds is the development of efficient and new nanocatalysts1,2. In recent times, there has been a growing interest in magnetic nanoparticles within the nanomaterial supports category3. This is because of their remarkable properties, including simple preparation and functionalization, a large surface area ratio, low toxicity, and cost-effectiveness4. The primary benefit of magnetic nanoparticles is the effortless separation of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) supported catalysts from a reaction product or mixture using an external magnet5,6,7. Based on these intriguing benefits, magnetic nanoparticles present a promising alternative to other catalyst supports, such as porous or mesoporous ones8. Recently, nanoscale compounds have garnered significant attention from researchers due to their unique chemical properties and catalytic applications9. These nanomaterials can serve as valuable supports for immobilizing homogeneous catalysts, effectively combining the benefits of both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Facilitating easy and rapid separation of catalysts from the reaction mixture is crucial in catalytic processes10. Traditionally, heterogeneous catalysts are recycled through tedious filtration processes, often resulting in the unavoidable loss of solid material. To address this, magnetic nanoparticles have been developed as suitable alternatives for catalytic reactions11. In recent years, these nanoparticles have been extensively studied, as using an external magnet to separate the catalyst makes recovering catalysts from the reaction mixture much more convenient compared to traditional methods12. AlFe2O4 nanoparticles have been extensively researched for their scientific significance and practical applications as a core magnetic support among various magnetic nanoparticles13,14. The catalysis of chemical reactions by acids represents a consistently essential and captivating focus of research in organic synthesis15,16. The development and application of robust solid acids as catalysts in synthetic reactions are promising for the future of organic synthesis, especially within the context of green chemistry17,18,19. Immobilizing acidic functional groups on magnetic nanoparticles and utilizing them as catalysts in organic reactions is an ideal and fascinating solution to overcome this drawback20,21,22. This is because the catalyst can be easily separated from the reaction media using an external magnet23,24. Due to the rising energy consumption and the impending depletion of non-renewable fossil fuels, biodiesel has emerged as a promising alternative in the industrial sector25,26. Biodiesel is a renewable, stable, sulfur-free fuel composed of monoalkyl esters of fatty acids, produced mainly by esterification of fatty acids with short-chain primary alcohols using acid–base catalysts26,27. It is important to first esterify free fatty acids like oleic acid, linoleic acid, and others in incompatible feedstocks before using base catalysts for the transesterification reaction, as this helps prevent soap formation28. Therefore, acid catalysis is more suitable for biodiesel production29. In this case, the esterification reaction with a highly effective acid catalyst, without the need for any substrate pretreatment, can result in the production of eco-friendly biodiesel from oleic acid30,31.

Organic sulfoxides serve as valuable synthetic intermediates in laboratories, industries, pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals. The common method for synthesizing these materials involves the oxidation of sulfides32. Additionally, disulfides are crucial in various biological and chemical processes, including their use in sensor development, oil-sweetening procedures, vulcanizing agents, and more33.

This work describes the synthesis and structural analysis of an innovative green catalyst. We also examine its effectiveness as an efficient and environmentally friendly option for Biodiesel Production. This solid acid catalyst showed effective catalytic performance in comparison to other solid acid catalysts previously reported (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Graphic abstract.

Experimental

Materials and Instrumentation The chemicals employed in this study were procured from Fisher and Merck. All reagents and solvents utilized throughout the research were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich, Fluka, or Merck and were used as received without any additional purification.

Preparation of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H

Magnetic nanoparticles (FeAl2O4) were prepared by the coprecipitation method. In a mixture of 80 mL ethanol and water (ratio 1:1) under a N2 atmosphere at 80 °C, FeCl2·4H2O (10 mmol) and AlCl3·9H2O (20 mmol) were added. Then sodium hydroxide was added under stirring to obtain uniform black FeAl2O4 MNP nanoparticles. Once cooled, the samples were gathered using a permanent magnet and then meticulously washed several times with deionized water and EtOH. Subsequently, they were dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C for 15 h.

To functionalize, 3-chloropropyltrimethoxysilane (n-Pr) (2.5 mL) was carefully added to a mixture of 1 g FeAl2O4 in 50 mL toluene. The resulting solution was stirred under nitrogen at 60 °C for 15 h to complete the process. After silanization, the solid material was separated using a magnet and thoroughly dried before being utilized in the subsequent process.

To prepare AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et, 1 g of AlFe2O4@n-Pr samples was dispersed in 20 mL of toluene. Then, 2.5 mmol of Triethylenetetramine (Et) was added to the reaction mixture, which was refluxed for 24 h. The AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et were then isolated using a magnet, washed with EtOH, and dried.

Finally, to prepare the AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H catalyst, a mixture of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@-Et (1.0 g) was dispersed in 80 ml of hexane in a round-bottomed flask. Next, 0.4 g of chlorosulfonic acid were carefully added drop by drop into the reaction vessel, and then the mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 24 h. Following the reaction, the resulting catalyst (AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H) was subsequently isolated, purified with water and ethanol, and ultimately dried under vacuum at 55 °C (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Synthesis of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

Biodiesel production

Initially, 3 mmol of oil, 12 mmol of methanol, and 0.04 g of catalyst were combined in a round bottom flask. After that, the blend was warmed to 60 °C and left for 2 h. Once the reaction was complete, the catalyst was filtered using a centrifuge, followed by the removal of excess methanol from the upper liquid phase using rotary evaporation. The organic phase that was extracted underwent an additional wash with distilled water to eliminate any remaining impurities and was then dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate (Scheme 2)34,35.

Scheme 2
scheme 2

esterification of oleic acid.

A general procedure for the oxidation of sulfides

A combination of sulfide (1 mmol) and H2O2 33% (0.4 mL) was poured into the round-bottomed flask containing AlFe2O4@@n-Pr@Et-SO3H (0.02 g). The resulting mixture was stirred at 25 °C without the use of any solvent. After the reaction was completed, the AlFe2O4@@n-Pr@Et-SO3H compound was isolated using a magnet, and the resulting products were then extracted with a mixture of water and ethyl acetate. Subsequently, the organic substance mixture was dried using 1.5 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was then evaporated to obtain a high yield of pure sulfoxides (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3
scheme 3

Oxidation of sulfides catalyzed by AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

Selected NMR data

Methyl oleate: 1H NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz) δ = 0.86 (s, 3H), 1.25 (s, 20H), 1.52 (m, 2H), 1.99 (s, 4H), 2.26(s, 2H), 3.58(s, 3H), 5.34 (d, 2H) ppm.

(Sulfinylbis(methylene))dibenzene: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δH = 7.4–7.5 (m, 10H), 4.36 (s, 4H) ppm.

(Ethylsulfinyl)ethane: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δH = 2.1 (q, 4H), 1.0 (t, 6H) ppm.

(Methylsulfinyl)benzene: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δH = 2.1 (q, 5H), 1.2(t, 3H) ppm.

Results and discussion

After the AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H synthesis, EDX, TEM, VSM, FTIR, SEM, TGA, and XRD were employed to identify its nanostructure and nature accurately.

Catalyst characterizations

FT-IR spectra of AlFe2O4 (a), AlFe2O4@n-Pr (b), and AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et (c) catalyst is shown in Fig. 2. The FT-IR spectrum of the AlFe2O4 NPs shows a stretching vibration at 3440 cm−1, indicating the presence of both symmetrical and asymmetrical modes of the O–H bonds attached to the surface iron atoms (Fig. 2a). The FT-IR spectrum of AlFe2O4 nanoparticles exhibits two bands at 483 and 671 cm-1, attributed to the stretching vibrations of the aluminum-oxygen and iron-oxygen bonds, respectively. In Fig. 2b, The appearance of new peaks at 2877 and 2948 cm−1, which correspond to CH2 bending vibration, respectively, provide evidence for modifying the surface of AlFe2O4 nanoparticles with 3-chloromethoxypropylsilane (AlFe2O4@n-Pr, Fig. 2c). In Fig. 2c, the existence of peaks at 1103, 1127, and 1602 cm−1 in Fig. 2c, which are allocated to C-N and N–H stretching absorptions of triethylenetetramine (Et), are indicative peaks for confirmation of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et nanoparticles. The FT-IR spectrum in Fig. 2d confirmed the functionalization of –SO3H groups on AlFe2O4@n-Pr through the absorption of OH stretching bands of the –SO3H moiety at 2500–3500 cm-1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

FTIR spectra of (a) AlFe2O4, (b) AlFe2O4@n-Pr, (c) AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et, (d) AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

Figure 3 illustrates the normal angle powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for AlFe2O4 (a) and AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H (b). The XRD pattern of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H closely resembles that of MFe2O4, indicating the presence of octahedral structures. These patterns display a crystallized structure corresponding to the (2 2 0), (3 1 1), (2 2 2), (4 0 0), (4 2 2), (5 1 1), and (4 4 0) crystallographic faces of magnetite. The XRD results for AlFe2O4 confirm a crystalline cubic spinel structure characteristic of AlFe2O4, aligning with standard reference data (JCPDS file, PDF no. 96–901-2447). After the attachment of sulfuric acid, a noticeable reduction in peak intensity was observed for AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H, along with increased background noise. These observations suggest that the textural characteristics of AlFe2O4 were maintained during the preparation of the SO3H-supported catalyst, with its crystalline phase and structural properties remaining intact36,37,38.

Fig. 3
figure 3

XRD spectrum of (a) AlFe2O4 and (b) AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

An investigation using TGA was conducted to quantitatively assess the presence of the ligand (Et-SO3H) on the surface of AlFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Weight loss below 250 °C is linked to the removal of organic solvents (Fig. 4a). Specifically, 15% of the weight loss in this temperature range is due to organic solvents (Fig. 4b). In Fig. 4b, it is noted that AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H shows a 35% weight reduction between 250 and 600 °C, indicating the decomposition of its constituents. The TGA analysis thus confirmed the successful anchoring of -SO3H groups on the surface of AlFe2O4 MNPs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

TGA curve of (a) AlFe2O4, (b) AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

To gain insight into the chemical composition of the nanocomposite, an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was conducted. Figure 5 illustrates the profile, depicting Fe and Al as the metallic components. The successful formation of a sulfuric acid shell on the surface of AlFe2O4 has been confirmed by the presence of sulfur and oxygen. Furthermore, the absence of any other elements indicates the high purity of the sample. The sulfur presence was indeed detected, but no amount of Cl was observed, indicating that the covalent adsorption of SO3H groups had successfully taken place on the catalyst surface.

Fig. 5
figure 5

EDX images of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

Figure 6 presents the SEM analysis of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H, illustrating its morphology and dimensions. This analysis clearly reveals the uniform spherical shape of the nanocomposite, featuring a rough surface texture. Importantly, no significant aggregation was observed in the sample, suggesting a successful distribution and stability of the nanocomposite.

Fig. 6
figure 6

SEM images of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to evaluate the shape, size, and morphology of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). Figure 7 depicts TEM images showing spherical ferrite materials with smooth surfaces at various magnifications. The image distinguishes between the darker layer, which represents the AlFe2O4 substrate, and the lighter layer, identifying the Et-SO3H attached to the substrate. These materials exhibit a uniform, amorphous phase of Et-SO3H that is evenly distributed on the surface of a typical AlFe2O4 spinel core. The presence of a light shell over the core further supports the hypothesis that SO3H functionalities, along with Et moieties, are immobilized on its surface (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

TEM images of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

The magnetic properties and values of the nanocomposites AlFe2O4, AlFe2O4@n-Pr, and AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H were additionally assessed through VSM measurements at room temperature (Fig. 8). The saturation magnetization (Ms) values for (a) AlFe2O4, (b) AlFe2O4@n-Pr, and (c) AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H are 68, 49, and 27 emu g−1, respectively. The values make it clear that the magnetization value of the samples was significantly reduced through surface modification and catalytic functional group immobilization on the AlFe2O4 support. However, the MNPs targeted displayed outstanding superparamagnetic properties and can be easily separated.

Fig. 8
figure 8

VSM curves of (a) AlFe2O4, (b) AlFe2O4@n-Pr (c) AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

NH3-TPD results

To examine the acidity of the AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H catalysts, NH3-TPD analysis was conducted, and the findings are presented in Fig. 9. Typically, ammonia desorption from alumina-based catalysts occurs within the 100–900 °C temperature range. The TPD profile for the AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H catalyst revealed two distinct ammonia desorption peaks. The first peak at 350 °C indicates desorption from sites with moderate acidity, while the high-temperature peak at 630 °C reflects desorption from strong acidic sites. Figure 9 shows clearly the AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H sample possess both weak and strong acid sites.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The NH3-TPD of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

Catalytic studies

Esterification reactions

The catalytic activity of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H was evaluated during the esterification of oleic acid with methanol, as detailed in Table 1. To determine the optimal conditions for biodiesel production using this catalyst, the study explored various parameters, including temperature, the molar ratio of methanol to oleic acid, and the amount of catalyst used. Repeated reactions with varying amounts of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H under consistent conditions showed a significant yield increase, up to 98%, when employing 0.04 g of the catalyst (see Table 1, entries 2–5). The influence of different temperatures on the reaction was also assessed (Table 1, entries 6 and 7), identifying 60 °C as the most effective for product formation. These observations led to the conclusion that the highest biodiesel yield was achieved with 0.04 g of the nanocatalyst at 60 °C, achieving a conversion rate of 98% from oleic acid to ester. The study highlighted a 3:12 molar ratio between oleic acid and methanol as being vital for successful esterification (see Table 1, entries 8–11). Typically, an excess of alcohol helps to disperse the solid acid catalyst in oily media and enhances the interaction between reactants, thereby boosting biodiesel yield. Furthermore, as is common in esterification processes, an excess of alcohol can prevent the reverse reaction, contributing to a gradual increase in ester production over time.

Table 1 Material balance calculations for the optimized yield of biodiesel in the presence of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

The mechanism of the AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H catalytic esterification is illustrated in Scheme 4 and can be broken down into three stages. Initially, AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H acts as a catalyst by activating the carbonyl group of oleic acid, leading to the formation of positive carbon ions. Subsequently, methanol molecules interact with these positive carbon ions to create intermediate products. This is followed by the transfer of hydrogen ions from intermediate product II, resulting in the formation of a protonated hydroxyl group. During this process, water molecules are eliminated from the main chain of product II. Ultimately, methyl oleate is formed as product III, and the heterogeneous catalyst AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H is then separated from the final mixture3,39.

Scheme 4
scheme 4

Proposed Mechanism for biodiesel in this presence of AlFe2O4@@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

To improve the reaction conditions, we studied the oxidation process of methyl phenyl sulfide as a model compound using H2O2 under various reaction parameters, such as time and product yield (refer to Table 2). According to the table, the reaction remained incomplete without AlFe2O4@@n-Pr@Et-SO3H even after 5 h. When a catalytic amount of AlFe2O4@@n-Pr@Et-SO3H (0.02 g) was used under solvent-free conditions at room temperature, H2O2 was identified as the most effective reagent for achieving complete conversion of methyl phenyl sulfide to methyl phenyl sulfoxide.

Table 2 Optimizing reaction conditions for oxidation of methyl phenyl sulfide in the presence of AlFe2O4@@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

The versatility of this method has been proven by the easy conversion of aryl, cyclic, benzylic, and linear sulfides, as depicted in Table 3. The sulfoxides were rapidly obtained with excellent yields. To showcase the chemical selectivity of the process, sulfides containing oxidation-prone and acid-sensitive functional groups such as CHO, OH, and CO2CH3 were employed in the sulfoxidation reaction. Importantly, these functional groups remained unaltered during the conversion from sulfide to sulfoxide, as illustrated in Table 3.

Table 3 Oxidation of sulfides into sulfoxides in the presence of AlFe2O4@@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

Scheme 5 outlines a potential pathway for the oxidation of sulfides. One approach involves the in-situ formation of peroxy acid when AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H reacts with H2O2, subsequently transferring oxygen to the organic substrate (illustrated in Scheme 5a). Alternatively, another approach suggests that AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H acts as a protic acid, polarizing the O–O bond in hydrogen peroxide to produce the reactive oxygen transfer agent (depicted in Scheme 5b).

Scheme 5
scheme 5

The suggested mechanism for the oxidation of sulfide.

Hot filtration

To demonstrate heterogeneity, two parallel reactions were conducted under identical conditions using oleic acid and methanol for esterification in the presence of a catalyst at 65 °C in ethanol. After 60 min, one reaction was halted, achieving a yield of 47%. Simultaneously, the catalyst was removed from the second reaction, allowing it to proceed without the catalyst for an additional 60 min, resulting in a 51% yield. The minor 4% increase in conversion underscores the role and heterogeneity of the catalyst.

Catalyst recyclability

To further investigate the recyclability of the magnetic nanocatalyst, we conducted a reaction between oleic acid and methanol using 0.04 g of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H as our model. The nanocatalyst was separated from the reaction mixture with a magnet and washed several times with water and ethanol. It was reused for over five cycles without any significant loss of activity, as shown in Fig. 10. Thanks to its excellent recovery from the reaction mixture, together with its stability and resistance to decomposition, the catalyst can be retrieved and reused multiple times. It maintained its activity over five consecutive cycles, highlighting its robustness.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Recyclability of AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H.

In Table 4, the catalytic activities of previously documented solid acid catalysts are contrasted with those of our prepared AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol. Solid acid catalysts show better catalytic efficiency in less time compared to AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H catalyst under the given reaction conditions. This shows that the AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H catalyst is more effective in esterification reactions than previous ones (refer to Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of the catalytic efficiency of reported acid catalysts with prepared AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H catalyst in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol.

Conclusion

This study outlines the development of an efficient method for producing AlFe2O4@n-Pr@Et-SO3H, an innovative and eco-friendly magnetic nanocatalyst that is easy to recover. The catalyst was characterized using techniques like EDS, SEM, VSM, XRD, TGA, TEM, and FT-IR. It was applied in esterification reactions and the oxidation of sulfides. The synthesis of this nanocatalyst involves readily available materials and features a simplified work-up procedure. Advantages of this method include the use of a non-toxic solvent, high yield, short reaction time, compatibility with various functional groups, and the ability to recycle and reuse the catalyst with an external magnet for up to four cycles with minimal reduction in product yields.