Abstract
The Caribbean through-flow (CTF) is a vital component of Earth’s climate system, facilitating and impacted by heat and salt fluxes from major circulation systems like the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre (NASTG) and Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Here, we show significant changes have occurred in upper ocean water mass properties of the CTF since 1960, including subsurface warming of ~ 0.2 °C decade−1, surface freshening of ~ 0.13 g kg−1 decade−1, and subsurface salinification of ~ 0.05 g kg−1 decade−1. In the upper 0–200 m, temperature and stability increases are nearly 3 and 20 times larger than globally averaged trends, respectively, with implications for tropical cyclones, sea level rise, and marine ecosystems. We show these upper ocean changes are likely impacting water mass formation in the NASTG, thereby indirectly influencing the AMOC. These findings highlight the CTF as a bottleneck for climatically important water masses and emphasize the need for sustained subsurface observations here.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The oceanic conditions of the Caribbean Sea have profound impacts on the broader Intra-Americas Sea region, driving tropical cyclone generation and rapid intensification as well as sea level rise, both which are increasingly devastating coastal communities1. The main circulation in the Intra-Americas Sea region, the Caribbean through-flow (CTF) (Fig. 1), is an important component of Earth’s climate system as it organizes and transports significant heat, salt, and freshwater fluxes from two major circulation systems, the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre (NASTG) and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). As these flows combine, the resulting CTF and its properties are exported through the Yucatán Straits to feed the Florida Current and eventually forms an important component of the Gulf Stream. Though historical literature highlighting the importance of the Florida Current in carrying NASTG and AMOC transport northward over the past several decades has progressed our understanding of ocean circulation2,3,4,5,6, this is largely due to the ease of measuring the Florida Current concentrated in the Florida Straits between the Florida and the Bahamas. However, the structure and magnitude of the Florida Current water mass transport are determined by processes that mix and modify water masses from the North and South Atlantic in the Caribbean Sea. Moreover, mass conservation requires that the sum of the CTF inflow pathways from the Atlantic through the complex bathymetry of the Antilles Island arc is equal to the transport of the Florida Current. In this sense, it is the CTF that represents a chokepoint for climatically important water masses.
Schematic Atlantic circulation and mean Caribbean through-flow water mass properties. Top panel shows a general schematic of the Atlantic circulation in relation to the Caribbean through-flow. Bottom panels show mean 1960–2023 conservative temperature (left) and absolute salinity (right) at 150 m calculated from EN4 profile data. Domain shown in the bottom panels is representative of the Caribbean through-flow ___domain. CTF-averaged properties are computed in this ___domain, using the 0.5° latitude × 0.5° longitude spatial grid (see “Methods” section). The 150-m depth is chosen as this is a depth where there is a statistically significant trend in both temperature and salinity.
Significant paleoceanographic evidence exists supporting this linkage between upper ocean water mass conditions in the CTF and both NASTG and AMOC strength7,8,9,10,11,12. This connection is largely due to the impact of water mass origin, as North Atlantic Water, representing NASTG recirculation, and South Atlantic Water, representing northward AMOC return flow, have distinctly different temperature and salinity properties and communicate signals from both circulation systems. Water mass analyses have found the majority of the South Atlantic inflow is concentrated in the Caribbean’s southeastern Windward Island Passages2,13 while the northeastern passages exhibit stronger inflow from North Atlantic Water13,14. The generally accepted mean of ~ 17 Sv of South Atlantic Water needed to balance the AMOC deep southward interior flow15,16 are believed to enter the Caribbean through the island passage of the Antilles Arc2,3,13,14,17 and then contribute to the ~ 30 Sv transport through the Yucatán Straits18, representing the termination of the CTF. From this perspective, the CTF lies at a significant nexus point for heat, salt, and freshwater fluxes in the upper limb of the AMOC and NASTG19.
Recent evidence indicates the NASTG is changing20,21,22,23 and the AMOC may be slowing24,25,26,27. As the AMOC transports ~ 25% of the northern hemisphere’s northward atmospheric-ocean heat transport at 26.5° N28, changes in this inter-hemispheric conveyor belt of ocean heat would lead to a profound reorganization of the modern climate system including impacts to both ecosystems and human health, livelihoods, and food and water security globally29,30. Coastal communities, including those throughout the Caribbean, could experience accelerated regional sea-level rise, marine heatwaves, and extreme storms31, making them particularly susceptible to changes driven by these large-scale circulations. One of the most concerning teleconnections between oceanic conditions and climate processes is the coherent multi-decadal coupling between AMOC strength and Atlantic tropical cyclone activity32. While scientific understanding of the CTF was advanced substantially by ship-based campaigns in the 1990’s2,4,5,6,13, the lack of a comprehensive, focused investigation into the CTF in the 2 decades since, especially considering the changes in Earth’s climate in the twenty-first century, represents a limitation in our ability to understand and decipher climatic variability in this important region and its larger scale impacts.
Here, we reveal rapid, multi-decadal temperature, salinity, and stratification trends in the CTF by combining all available temperature and salinity profiles collected in the Caribbean since 1960 from the EN433 database augmented with missing historical ship-based campaigns and autonomous underwater glider deployments, resulting in over 28,000 profiles (see “Methods” section). We also utilize subsurface velocity fields from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service’s 1/12° Global Ocean Physics Reanalysis (GLORYS) to translate these trends in water mass properties to heat, salt, and freshwater transports, which allows for a more direct analysis of the role of these changes on the circulation of the greater Atlantic (see “Methods” section). This analysis reveals significant changes occurring in the water mass properties of the CTF. We provide evidence for changes in the CTF component of the heat, salt and freshwater transport at this latitude with magnitudes large enough to likely impact water mass formation in the NASTG, thereby indirectly influencing the AMOC. We discuss additional implications for these changes including local and regional sea-level rise, increasing oceanic conditions promoting tropical cyclone activity, and impacts to biological processes and productivity.
Results
Observed changes in water mass properties
For each profile in our combined dataset, we calculate anomalies by computing and subtracting maps of all-time mean temperature, salinity, and density profiles on depth levels (see “Methods” section). The resulting time series shows a statistically significant warming trend from the surface to 150 m with a mean trend of 0.19 ± 0.05 °C decade−1 (Fig. 2). Warming peaks in the upper 5 m with a trend of 0.23 ± 0.1 °C decade−1. Cooling does not occur at any depth. The mean upper 150 m warming trend is 1.3 ± 0.1 °C since 1960. The vertical structure of the decadal trends in salinity shows more nuance. The upper 5 m show a statistically significant freshening trend of − 0.13 ± 0.05 g kg−1 decade−1 whereas a statistically significant salinification trend occurs from 70 to 225 m with a mean trend of 0.035 ± 0.009 g kg−1 decade−1. The salinification peak at 125 m of 0.05 ± 0.009 g kg−1 decade−1 coincides with the depth of the salinity maximum waters. Mean salinity has increased by 0.2 g kg−1 in the 70–225 m layer since 1960. In combination, these temperature and salinity trends result in a statistically significant mean density reduction of − 0.08 kg m−3 decade−1 in the 0–60 m layer (Fig. 2). Below 60 m, temperature and salinity changes are density compensated. The density reduction peaks in the upper 5 m with a trend of − 0.17 ± 0.06 kg m−3 decade−1. Mean density in the upper 5 m has decreased by 1.1 kg m−3 since 1970.
Sixty-year changes in the upper kilometer of Caribbean Through-Flow water mass properties. Top panels show the time-evolution of decadal mean conservative temperature (°C), absolute salinity (g kg−1), potential density (kg m−3), and buoyancy frequency (103 s−2). The corresponding trends (per decade) are shown in the bottom panels and shaded by ± one standard error unit. Averaging of EN4 profile data is done over the entire Caribbean region shown in Fig. 1 following quality control procedures (see “Methods” section).
Our finding of a warming trend of 0.15 ± 0.06 °C decade−1 in the upper 500 m is ~ 3 times greater than the globally averaged trend from 2006 to 2013 in the upper 500 m from Argo profiles34. However, our finding of a warming trend of 0.18 ± 0.04 °C decade−1 in the upper 250 m is approximately 1/3 of that observed from 2001 to 2023 in the Gulf Stream at the same depth35. As the CTF constitutes the source waters for the Gulf Stream, the trends reported here both confirm prior evidence of enhanced warming over subtropical northwest Atlantic35,36 and highlight potential processes occurring between the CTF and the Gulf Stream as important for further accelerating upper ocean warming (e.g. the Loop Current, Gulf of Mexico, etc.).
The statistically significant salinification trend in the 70–225 m range reported here is consistent in both sign and magnitude relative to observed salinity changes in the Florida Current37 between 1982–1987 and 2001–2015 and Gulf Stream35 from 2006 to 2013. For instance, the 0.16 ± 0.02 g kg−1 salinification observed in the Florida Current at the depth of the salinity maximum (~ 125–150 m) agrees well with the 0.12 ± 0.02 g kg−1 reported here over a comparable time and depth range. Due to the stark trend at these depths and the CTF’s strong connection to the subtropics where these subsurface salinity maximum waters are formed, we investigate this salinification further over yearly and decadal timescales (see “Methods” section). This focused examination of the salinity maximum waters confirmed a significant decadal salinification trend on the order of 0.05 ± 0.006 g kg−1 decade−1 (Fig. 3). This salinification trend is similar to that observed towards the formation region of these salinity maximum waters in the NASTG38.
Time-evolution of climate-relevant water column parameters. Decadal (orange) and yearly mean (blue) absolute salinity maximum (top), Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential (TCHP) (middle), and potential energy anomaly (PEA) (bottom) calculated from EN4 profile data in the Caribbean Through-Flow region. Shading on yearly means and error bars on the decadal means represents ± one standard error unit. The black line represents a linear regression of the yearly means and grey lines denote the 95% confidence interval of the fitted trends.
Increasing upper ocean stability and tropical cyclone heat potential
The observed changes in the water mass properties of the CTF reported here have resulted in changes to water column vertical structure and stability that have both local and global implications. Figure 2 also shows the vertical structure of the decadal mean and trend in buoyancy frequency. There is an increase in upper ocean stratification in the upper ~ 200 m as evident by the buoyancy frequency increase with a mean trend of 1.2 ± 0.93 × 10−5 s−2 decade−1 here. This trend is nearly a factor of 20 larger than the 1960–2018 global trend of 6.9 ± 4.4 × 10−7 s−2 decade−1 estimated from EN4 data over the same depth range39. This dramatic increase in upper-ocean stability is likely due to the surface layer warming and freshening in concert with the subsurface salinity maximum waters salinification that increases the vertical density gradient of the upper ocean.
Potential energy anomaly (PEA) is an alternate measure of stratification and can be viewed as a measure of the energy required to fully mix a water column with a given vertical density gradient (see “Methods” section). Figure 3 shows a statistically significant increase in PEA in the 0–200 m layer with a mean trend of 27.13 ± 8.5 J m−3 decade−1, which equates to an increase of approximately 123 J m−3 since 1960. We calculate PEA over the upper 200 m as this layer captures the net effect of warming and freshening the surface layer as well as the salinification of the subsurface salinity maximum on the water column stability.
The CTF is known to establish oceanographic conditions that promote tropical cyclone rapid intensification, such as warm, freshwater barrier layers that suppress upper ocean mixing40,41. Therefore, the increasing the stability of the upper ocean in the CTF is particularly concerning considering the comparable rise in Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential (TCHP)42. The upper ocean warming has driven a decadal increase in TCHP with a mean trend of 4.7 ± 1.4 kJ cm−3 deacade−1, which equates to a mean increase of approximately 31 kJ cm−3 since 1960. Further, upper ocean Turner angle43 values in the upper 50 m have shifted from positive (temperature dominant contribution to stratification) to negative (salinity dominant contribution to stratification) since 1960. This change in the driver of stratification implies the CTF has shifted to a regime more dominated by surface freshwater barrier layers44.
Changes in heat, salt, and freshwater transport
Because the Yucatan Straits (Fig. 1) act as a bottleneck for water masses in the Caribbean, exporting all ~ 30 Sv of the CTF northward18,45, we are able to place the observed changes in temperature and salinity in the context of the circulation of the greater Atlantic by deriving trends in heat, salt, and freshwater transports relative to the net transport (see “Methods” section). GLORYS velocity fields are used to balance the mass flux of the Yucatan Straits with the mass flux along 21.5° N across the Atlantic interior (Supplementary Fig. 4). We apply the same methodology applied to the EN4 profiles across the CTF to all available EN4 profiles across 21.5° N to calculate corresponding decadal mean temperature and salinity profiles for the Atlantic interior. Then, with mass flux balanced, these decadal mean temperature and salinity profiles can be used to derive net meridional heat, salt, and freshwater transports.
There is significant uncertainty involved with the calculation of Atlantic interior decadal mean temperature and salinity profiles, largely due to poor data coverage in earlier decades in the open Atlantic. Further, the GLORYS reanalysis data used to compute volume transport only spans the period of 1993–2023 which adds an additional layer of uncertainty in using this dataset for transport calculations decades prior to this period. To overcome these challenges, we employ a Monte-Carlo simulation to propagate the uncertainty in these derived quantities to obtain a more robust estimation of heat, salt, and freshwater transports (see “Methods” section).
The Monte-Carlo simulations revealed a likely mean net heat, salt, and freshwater transport for the Yucatan Straits/21.5° N of 1.27 ± 0.11 PW, 52.5 ± 17.0 Sv, and − 0.009 ± 0.013 Sv, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). The net heat transport estimate here agrees well with the 1.2 ± 0.12 PW estimate at the 26.5° N RAPID array28. Further, ocean reanalyses have suggested the peak net northward ocean heat transport occurs around 15° N with values exceeding 1.3 PW frequently46. While we refrain from discussing any trends in the net transports revealed by the Monte-Carlo simulations, we assert the Yucatan Straits component of the net transports provide a valuable comparison point that allows for placing the trends in CTF water mass properties discussed here in the context of the circulation of the greater Atlantic.
As the mass transport of the Yucatan Straits contributes 88–100% of the source waters for the Florida Current transport45, the Yucatan Straits component of the net heat, salt, and freshwater transport can be viewed as analogous to the Florida Current component of the greater RAPID array. Results from the Monte-Carlo simulations revealed the heat, salt, and freshwater transport of the Yucatan Straits is likely 84% ± 14%, 85% ± 15%, and 67% ± 11% of the Florida Current, respectively. The Monte-Carlo simulations also revealed the decadal trends in CTF water mass properties are driving decadal trends in the heat, salt, and freshwater transport of the Yucatan Straits that are statistically different from zero, implying a likely increase in these metrics. In light of our inability to conclusively determine trends in the net transports, we assert the likely increase in Yucatan Straits transport over the 1960–2023 time period relative to the net transport is a meaningful metric. In the following section, we show the likely 5%, 3%, and 2% increases in heat, salt, and freshwater transport of the Yucatan Straits relative to the respective net transports (Supplementary Table 1) are quite large and likely impacting the circulation of the greater Atlantic.
Discussion
Global processes driving recent rapid regional climate change are becoming well documented in many oceanographic regions47,48,49. The CTF water mass property changes documented here expand the growing evidence connecting accelerated regional climate change with large-scale processes. We have divided the discussion below into two sections where we (1) highlight the implications of these changes on the Caribbean Sea locally and then (2) discuss the likely drivers of these water mass property changes and their relation to and impact on the circulation of the greater Atlantic.
Caribbean sea-level is the most directly impacted metric by the water mass property changes detailed here. Long-term sea-level rise trends and projections in the Caribbean Sea have been largely attributed to upper ocean steric variability50,51 and rapid rates of sea-level rise in the Caribbean Sea from 2010 to 2016 have been attributed to an increase in upper ocean temperature and salinity52. While the vertical structure of these previously documented water mass changes agrees with the trends observed here, the contribution from surface freshwater loss differs from the decadal trend. Interestingly, however, our analysis shows a brief increase in surface salinity during the 2010’s decade, despite the overall freshening. Subsurface warming and redistribution of ocean mass onto the continental shelf was recently revealed as the dominant mechanism behind an acceleration in sea-level rise trends in the Gulf of Mexico53. In addition, accelerated sea-level rise trends along the U.S. east coast south of Cape Hatteras was shown to be caused by a 0.2 °C year−1 warming of the Florida Current54. As the CTF forms the source waters for the inflow to the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf Stream, the sea-level rise impacts from these water mass trends could also be expected downstream.
The CTF warming and resulting increase in TCHP is particularly concerning considering the accompanying increase in the stability of the upper ocean. Mean CTF TCHP has increased to well over the 60 kJ cm−2 threshold suggested for hurricane intensification55,56,57. However, this metric fails to capture the additional impact increased stratification can have on determining the oceanic conditions to promote tropical cyclone activity. Indeed, rapid intensification has recently been observed over low OHC waters when highly stratified58. The increase in upper ocean stability and TCHP, in addition to the potential shift in the dominant driver of stratification observed here, has likely played a role in the observed increases in tropical cyclone peak intensification rates in the central Caribbean in the twenty-first century59. This connection between a warmer, fresher, and more stable upper ocean and tropical cyclone intensification has been suggested for the Pacific60. The most concerning aspect of these trends is the potential for exacerbated exposure of already highly vulnerable communities. During the twenty-first century, exposed demographics to tropical cyclones have been found to be older and more disadvantaged globally61. Of the 177 countries and regions affected by tropical cyclones between 2002 and 2019, 8 of the top 14 most vulnerable countries are Caribbean and Central American countries61.
The upper ocean warming, subsurface salinification, and increase in stratification detailed here may also significantly impact marine productivity and biodiversity locally. Upper ocean warming has been shown to be a major stressor on Caribbean coral reef ecosystems over the past century62. Increased stratification has been associated with global declines in nutrient delivery63 and phytoplankton productivity64, and thus, might also be a concern for marine ecosystems in the Caribbean. Further, the “salty get saltier” pattern observed in mode waters throughout the Atlantic has recently been shown to coincide with an increase in subtropical ventilation that opposes warming-driven loss of oxygen65. As the CTF transports water mass anomalies formed throughout the greater Atlantic, whether the Caribbean is experiencing a deoxygenation as other tropical regions are experiencing remains an open question65.
In the second part of this discussion, we highlight relevant trends observed elsewhere and discuss possibility of their impact on the CTF considering the circulation dynamics of this region. We focus the discussion this way as the observations utilized here do not allow us to directly disentangle the origin or mechanisms behind the changes in CTF upper ocean water mass properties. We use Fig. 4 as a guide to discuss the potential origins of the changes in the CTF based on the water mass class they occurred in. Further, Fig. 4 and Supplemental Fig. 6 highlight how these changes are occurring on isopycnals, rather than as a result of the vertical movement of isopycnals, and thus reflect changes in water mass properties themselves.
Temperature-salinity diagram of decadal mean Caribbean Through-Flow water mass properties. Decadal mean temperature and salinity profiles calculated from EN4 profile data in the Caribbean Through-Flow from 1960 to 2023. Profiles are colored by decade of sampling. Relevant water masses labeled where SW: Surface Waters above 1024.5 kg m−3, STUW: Subtropical Under Water core at 1025.6 kg m−3, STMW: Subtropical Mode Water core 1026.5 kg m−3, and IW: Intermediate Water core at 1027.3 kg m−3. As these decadal mean profiles were originally calculated on depth levels, the schematic nature of these water mass labels is emphasized.
The magnitude of the Surface Water (SW in Fig. 4) warming agrees well with the sea surface temperature trends observed within the Caribbean Sea66 and throughout the entire Atlantic67. Associating the decreasing sea surface salinity trend reported here with relevant trends observed elsewhere in the Atlantic is not as straightforward as the trends in temperature. The advection of low salinity waters from the Amazon-Orinoco River systems has a first-order control on the surface salinity cycle of the western tropical Atlantic68. Therefore, an increase in the strength of the North Brazil Current (NBC) transport, possibly through enhanced NBC ring activity, would theoretically be needed to drive a reduction in the sea surface salinity of the CTF. As no significant trends have been observed in the NBC over most of the time period analyzed here69, an increase in local precipitation could provide an alternate explanation for the sea surface salinity decrease. Observations show a weak increase in precipitation over the Caribbean from 1986 to 2010, during which the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation was, and continues to be, in a positive phase preconditioning the Caribbean for wetter conditions70. Whether this decrease in sea surface salinity of the CTF can be attributed to the weak increase in precipitation over the Caribbean is uncertain.
Below the surface layer, the potential drivers of the subsurface salinification observed here are more straightforward. In Fig. 4, Subtropical Under Water (STUW) and Subtropical Mode Water (STMW) are formed via surface fluxes in both hemispheres. The evaporation–precipitation imbalances these regions experience has increased with the intensification of the global hydrologic cycle (i.e. wet get wetter, dry get drier), an expected result of global warming71,72,73. Therefore, the salinification reported for these water masses here is consistent with the “fresh gets fresher, salty gets saltier” pattern observed due to global warming38,65,74,75,76. This increase in sea surface salinity has led to a well-documented changes in the subduction rate of both North Atlantic STUW and STMW over the past several decades22,38,77,78,79. The corresponding increase in salinity of the subducted high salinity core of North Atlantic STUW and STMW has been reported at a similar, if not slightly lower, trend observed here. While trends in the South Atlantic STUW and STMW remain inconclusive primarily due to limited spatiotemporal resolution of salinity profiles80, a general salinification from 0 to 700 m of approximately 0.025–0.05 g kg−1 decade−1 throughout the South Atlantic81 implies similar trends are occurring here as well. Further, the magnitude and structure of the subsurface warming reported here agree well with trends observed in both North and South Atlantic Subtropical Mode Waters23,81,82.
Focusing on the impact of these changes on the circulation of the greater Atlantic, we now highlight how the magnitude of the observed CTF warming trend is consistent with recent observations of NASTG warming, leading to a surface density reduction and decline in subtropical mode water formation23. The decline in subtropical mode water formation has been coupled with a decline in the strength of the AMOC23. This coupling is mechanistically analogous to the downward cascade of subtropical mode waters in which cooling through each spiral of the NASTG increases the density of water parcels83,84,85. Lagrangian tracer analysis of model data has suggested ~ 70% of the waters in the northward flowing component of the AMOC must recirculate in the NASTG at least once before continuing northward, intimately connecting the NASTG and the AMOC85. This concept of a subsurface, rather than surface, transition from the subtropical to subpolar gyre has been suggested by others86,87,88,89,90,91 and supports a decadal timescale for transmission of water mass anomalies. Berglund et al.’s85 Lagrangian tracer analysis of model data provides a useful comparison point as they suggests the first two spirals through the NASTG take approximately 60 years and result in a heat loss of 0.175 PW and a salt loss of 0.24 × 106 kg s−1. Over the 63-year time-period considered in this analysis, the Yucatan Straits heat and salt transport has increased by approximately 0.07 ± 0.05 PW and 1.46 ± 2.60 Sv (equivalent to 1.46 + 2.6 × 106 kg s−1), respectively. The increase in heat transport represents 40% of the heat lost and the increase in salt transport is ~ 6 times the salt lost in the first two loops through the NASTG. Interestingly, the trends reported here for the Yucatan Straits are ~ 10% of the Florida Current increase in heat transport15 since 2010 but commensurate in terms of the increase in salt transport37 over the period from 1982–1987 to 2001–2015. These differences raise interesting questions about the processes occurring between these two regions yet support what appears to be more of an influence from warming, rather than salinification, on downstream water mass formation. Nonetheless, with this comparison we show the trends in Yucatan Straits heat and salt transport are quantitatively large enough to directly impact water mass formation in the NASTG.
Lastly, we highlight the trend in Yucatan Straits freshwater transport (− 0.004 Sv decade−1) as commensurate with the freshwater forcing used in many freshwater hosing experiments to understand AMOC stability92,93. More recent freshwater hosing experiments have shown a slowdown in AMOC strength of 0.5 Sv for every 0.01 Sv of freshwater added at a rate of 0.001 Sv year−1, eventually resulting in an complete AMOC collapse94. The degree to which tropical and subtropical salinification is relevant as a stabilizing feedback on the freshening trends projected to impact AMOC strength warrants further investigations. Again, we emphasize the uncertainty in the net transport estimates derived here and acknowledge these trends may be compensated by the southward Atlantic interior flow but use the above examples to highlight the potential impacts. Based on the results presented and the documented changes occurring elsewhere in the Atlantic, we conclude that, despite the mixing of interhemispheric water masses with distinctly different temperature and salinity properties, changes in water mass properties of the CTF are likely being communicated throughout the greater Atlantic and are influencing water mass formation in both the NASTG and the AMOC.
Using over 28,000 temperature and salinity profiles we document significant changes in the upper ocean water mass properties of the CTF since 1960. The implications of these changes highlight how the circulation dynamics of the CTF enhance this region’s already high climate sensitivity95. We find evidence for changes in the CTF component of the heat, salt, and freshwater transport at this latitude with magnitudes large enough to impact water mass formation in the NASTG, thereby indirectly influencing the AMOC. We find several likely routes to where these changes are transmitted throughout the greater Atlantic, leading to many presently observable changes that are consistent in magnitude with the trends reported here. These changes are also likely contributing to local sea-level rise, increasing oceanic conditions promoting tropical cyclone activity, and impacting biological processes and productivity. These findings emphasize the importance of the CTF as an important component of Earth’s climate system and reinforce the need for dedicated, sustained, subsurface water mass property observations needed for improved understanding of our climate.
Methods
EN4 profiles
We utilize profiles from the UK-Hadley Centre’s EN4 subsurface ocean temperature and salinity observational data product33 with bias corrections applied96 to analyze decadal trends in water mass properties in the Caribbean Sea. To ensure continuous, ample data coverage, only profiles from 1960 to 2023 are used. The native EN4 quality control flags (flag = 4) are applied to only accept profiles where both temperature and salinity are not rejected. The remaining data is then geographically subset to a shapefile that represents to extents of the Caribbean Sea: bounded to the east by the Lesser Antilles from the U.S. Virgin Islands south to the northeastern coast of Venezuela, to the north by the Greater Antilles from Puerto Rico to Cuba, and to the west and south by Central America and the northern coast of South America (Fig. 1).
After visual inspection it was clear two important Caribbean datasets were missing from the EN4 profiles. The first dataset is from the National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration Climate and Global Change Atlantic Climate Change Program sponsored Windward Island Passages monitoring Program (WIPP), which collected a comprehensive dataset of lowered Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) measurements in every major Caribbean island passage from 1991 to 2001. The second dataset is from autonomous underwater gliders deployed by Rutgers University and the University of the Virgin Islands in several eastern Caribbean passages from 2019 to 2023. These glider deployments have sampled over 5600 km over 270 days in the Anegada, Dominica, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent Passages. These datasets were combined with the EN4 profiles and the following processing steps were applied to all data. Temperature and salinity data are converted to potential temperature and practical salinity using the Internation Equator of State of Seawater 1980 (EOS-80)97 and conservative temperature and absolute salinity using the International Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater 2010 (TEOS-10)98. Daily mean profiles are calculated for these additional datasets to comply with the temporal resolution of the EN4 profile data. Each profile was linearly interpolated onto a common vertical grid, with 5-m resolution in the upper 100 m, 25-m resolution above 250 m and 50-m resolution above 1000 m. We limit the maximum depth of the mean profiles to 1000 m as the mean sill depth of the Caribbean island passages are 800 m and the maximum sampling depth of the gliders is 1000 m. Limiting the maximum depth to 1000 m also ensures for a more robust and complete dataset of Caribbean profiles as significantly smaller number of profiles extend below this depth.
As the EN4 profiles are separated by month in individual years, we combine the glider and WIPP profiles with the corresponding EN4 month and year before applying the subsequent steps which largely follow Gonçalves Neto et al.99. To avoid giving disproportionate weight to profiles collected close together in space and time, means of profiles in the same month in a given year in a 0.5° latitude × 0.5° longitude spatial grid were calculated. Though this issue is not apparent in the EN4 profiles, this approach does not account for a sampling bias across the Caribbean basin, where there is also variability in the vertical structure of water mass properties. All-time mean temperature and salinity profiles were then calculated for each spatial grid cell. Anomaly profiles were then calculated by subtracting the all-time mean profiles from each individual monthly mean profile at the same spatial grid cell. Yearly mean and decadal mean anomaly profiles are calculated by averaging the individual anomaly profiles accordingly. Next, the all-time mean profiles are added back to the yearly mean and decadal mean anomalies to calculate yearly mean and decadal mean profiles. Finally, buoyancy frequency is calculated using the Nsquared function from the Python implementation of the Gibbs SeaWater (GSW) Oceanographic Toolbox of TEOS-1098. Decadal trends and standard errors of the trend are then determined by fitting linear regressions to the respective decadal mean property profiles at every depth level over the 1960–2023 time-period used in this analysis. The trends are not weighted by the number of observations at a given depth.
The magnitude of the subsurface salinity maximum is calculated by sub-setting profiles to between 100 and 300 m and calculating yearly and decadal means and standard deviations. Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential (TCHP) is most relevant in during Hurricane season therefore only profiles from June to October are used for this calculation (Supplementary Fig. 1). TCHP is calculated following42:
where Q represents TCHP in kJ cm2, ρ represents density, \(C_{p}\) represents the heat capacity of seawater taken to be 3985 J kg−1 K−1, \(\Delta T\) represents the mean temperature different above 26 °C for a given depth increment \(\Delta z\). We also calculate potential energy anomaly (PEA) only during hurricane season to ensure it is meaningful with the related TCHP calculation described above. PEA is calculated following100:
where φ represent PEA in J m−3, ρ is density over a vertical profile with depth H, \(\overline{\rho }\) is the depth averaged density, z is depth, and g is gravitational acceleration.
To ensure there is minimal potential spatial biases, averaging data in decadal bins allows for sufficient spatial coverage in the Caribbean Sea (Supplementary Fig. 2). To investigate potential seasonal sampling biases, salinity maximum values are computed, and means are calculated for each month in each decade (Supplementary Fig. 3). The general increase in salinity maximum across all months further supports the salinification trend shown here despite the dramatic increase in number of observations in the summer months after 2010.
Heat, salt, and freshwater transport
To calculate potential heat, salt, and freshwater transports of the Caribbean Through-Flow water mass trends documented in this analysis, we use a combination of the EN4 profiles detailed above and Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service’s (CMEMS) 1/12° Global Ocean Physics Reanalysis (GLORYS). The GLORYS ocean model is based on the NEMO platform with 50 vertical levels with a resolution ranging from 1 to 450-m at 5000 m depth101. The model is forced at the surface by a 3-hourly European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalysis to reproduce diurnal cycling101. Large and Yeager bulk formulae102 are used to parameterized turbulent surface fluxes of momentum and heat. Precipitation and radiative flux biases are corrected by a satellite-based, large-scale adjustment101.
GLORYS has been shown to reproduce variability as well as vertical structure of temperature and salinity globally when compared to observation-based climatology101. Importantly, GLORYS was also shown to be in good agreement with meridional volume, heat, salt, and freshwater transports, particularly in the Atlantic basin101,103.
Because the Yucatan Straits act as a bottleneck for water masses in the Caribbean, exporting all ~ 30 Sv of the CTF northward18,45, we are able to place the observed changes in temperature and salinity in the context of the circulation of the greater Atlantic by deriving trends in heat, salt, and freshwater transports relative to the net transport. However, to calculate meaningful heat, salt, and freshwater transport the Yucatan Straits ~ 30 Sv net mass flux out of the Caribbean Sea18,45 needs to be balanced.
We initially find an all-time mean mass flux between the Yucatan Straits (27.9 ± 4.47 Sv) in good agreement with prior estimates18,45 and nearly balanced by the Atlantic interior section along 21.5° N (29.2 ± 3.50 Sv), a difference of just 1.3 Sv. The mean transport depth profile across the Yucatan Straits also agrees well with prior estimates18,45. However, we limit the Yucatan Straits transport to 760 m as the sill depth of the Florida Straits104 ultimately limit the depth to which waters can be transported northward. This reduces the all-time mean Yucatan Straits transport to 26.67 ± 2.47 Sv. We derive all-time mean velocity profiles across the Yucatan Straits and the Atlantic interior section along 21.5° N, interpolating them onto the same depth grid as the EN4 hydrographic data. To ensure mass balance between these two sections, we redistribute 0.0045 cm s−1 to every grid cell throughout the Atlantic interior section. A correction of a similar magnitude is historically performed on the RAPID section as well105. All-time mean velocity standard deviation at each depth level is also derived for use in the Monte-Carlo simulation detailed in the next section.
In a similar manner to the methodology applied to determine heat, salt, and freshwater transports at the RAPID-MOCHA array along 26.5° N28,106, we instead use the interior transport across 21.5° N (Supplementary Fig. 4) to derive a basin-wide mass balance with the Yucatan Straits here. The same methodology applied on the hydrographic data in the Caribbean detailed above is applied to EN4 profile data from the Atlantic interior along 21.5° N, where a longitudinal grid spacing of 2° and latitudinal grid of 1.5° are used. Temperature and salinity observations in the Atlantic interior along 21.5° N are extremely sparse, particularly in the earlier decades of our analysis time-period. To overcome this issue, we calculate an all-time climatological mean temperature and salinity field along 21.5° N and fill gaps in the individual decadal means with this estimate. Implications of this gap-filling procedure are discussed in the following section.
Net heat transport (\(Q_{NET}\)) is calculated following28:
where \(\rho\) is seawater density, \(c_{p}\) is the specific heat of seawater, \(v\) is meridional velocity, and \(\theta\) is potential temperature. The double integral is computed over the full area of the Yucatan Straits and Atlantic interior section along 21.5° N. We follow Johns et al.28 by using a constant value of ρcp = 4.1 × 106 J kg−1 °C−1 in the heat transport calculation.
Net salt transport (\(F_{S}\)) is calculated following106:
where \(v\) is meridional velocity and \(S\) is salinity and again the double integral is computed over the full area of the Yucatan Straits and Atlantic interior section along 21.5° N. We calculate salt transport on both the practical salinity scale (PSS-78) using units of practical salinity unit (PSU) as well as on the absolute salinity scale (TEOS-10) using units of g kg−1. On the practical salinity scale, salinity is unitless and therefore salt transport has units of Sverdrups, whereas on the absolute salinity scale it has units of Sverdrups g kg−1, which can effectively be converted to a mass flux of salt (g s−1) if multiplied by ρ.
Net equivalent freshwater transport (\(F_{e}\)) is calculated following McDonagh et al.106:
where \(\overline{s}\) is the section-averaged salinity, \(F_{S}\) is salinity flux from above, and T is transport. Along 21.5° N, \(\overline{s}\) is determined to be 35.2 which is in good agreement with the 35.17 determined at RAPID106. As salinity is always positive, a negative freshwater flux indicates removal of freshwater or increasing salinity.
Monte-Carlo simulation
There are two main factors that introduce significant uncertainty into this calculation of heat, salt, and freshwater transport:
-
1.
The 1993–2023 GLORYS reanalysis record does not overlap with the entire 1960–2023 time-period used in this analysis.
-
2.
The gap filling procedure for the sparse temperature and salinity observations in the greater Atlantic along 21.5° N in the earlier decades of our analysis time-period acts to dampen variability and therefore any potential trends in properties considerably.
To overcome these challenges, we employ a Monte-Carlo simulation to propagate the uncertainty in the individual components of in the transport calculations to obtain the most robust estimates possible. We ran 10,000 simulations when calculating both the all-time mean and decadal trends in heat, salt, and freshwater transport where we varied each term in the respective equations randomly within their respective 95% confidence intervals. For terms like temperature or the trend in temperature, this procedure simply evaluates the impact of picking different values within the 95% confidence interval of the mean temperature or trend in temperature at each depth level. This procedure attempts to account for both the significant uncertainty in the hydrographic data from the greater Atlantic along 21.5° N and the range of trends at each depth level in Fig. 2 to the best of our ability.
For terms involving velocity, we randomly vary the mean transport within the all-time standard deviation (± 4.26 Sv) for each simulation. Mass balance is ensured for each simulation by redistributing this transport adjustment evenly over the respective areas of the Yucatan Straits and Atlantic interior sections. This procedure attempts to account for the limited overlap in the time-periods between the GLORYS reanalysis and EN4 hydrographic data to the best of our ability. Potential decadal trends in mass transport are beyond the scope of this analysis.
The 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations result in a distribution, or probability, of the likely heat, salt, and freshwater transports and decadal trends in these transports given the uncertainty calculated for each input term (Supplementary Fig. 5). We evaluate these distributions by computing means and standard deviations. Further, the likelihood of a meaningful trend is determined by calculating a one-sided t-test between a given trend’s distribution and zero. A significant result implies the trend is statistically different from zero. Finally, we determine the decadal increase in the Yucatan Straits transport relative to the net transport (last column Supplementary Table 1) by taking the decadal trends from the Monte-Carlo simulations, multiplying them by the number of decades in our 1960–2023 analysis time-period, and dividing them by the respective net transports.
Data availability
All code and links to access data relevant to this manuscript can be found within the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/JGradone/CTF-WaterMass-Analysis.
References
Durán-Quesada, A. M., Sorí, R., Ordoñez, P. & Gimeno, L. Climate perspectives in the Intra-Americas Seas. Atmosphere 11, 959 (2020).
Rhein, M. et al. Transport of South Atlantic water through the passages south of Guadeloupe and across 16°N, 2000–2004. Deep Sea Res. Part I 52, 2234–2249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2005.08.003 (2005).
Kirchner, K., Rhein, M., Mertens, C., Böning, C. W. & Hüttl, S. Observed and modeled meridional overturning circulation related flow into the Caribbean. J. Geophys. Res. 113, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jc004320 (2008).
Johns, W., Townsend, T., Fratantoni, D. & Wilson, W. On the Atlantic inflow to the Caribbean Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part I 49, 211–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0637(01)00041-3 (2002).
Wilson, W. & Johns, W. Velocity structure and transport in the Windward Islands Passages. Deep Sea Res. Part I 44, 487–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0637(96)00113-6 (1997).
Johns, E., Wilson, W. D. & Molinari, R. L. Direct observations of velocity and transport in the passages between the Intra-Americas Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, 1984–1996. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 104, 25805–25820. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jc900235 (1999).
Schmidt, M. W., Spero, H. J. & Lea, D. W. Links between salinity variation in the Caribbean and North Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Nature 428, 160–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02346 (2004).
Parker, A. O., Schmidt, M. W. & Chang, P. Tropical North Atlantic subsurface warming events as a fingerprint for AMOC variability during Marine Isotope Stage 3. Paleoceanography 30, 1425–1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002832 (2015).
Fischel, A., Seidenkrantz, M.-S., Nürnberg, D., Kucera, M. & Kuijpers, A. Upper water mass variability in the Anegada–Jungfern Passage, NE Caribbean, during the last 11,100 cal. yr. Holocene 27, 1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616687378 (2017).
Reißig, S., Nürnberg, D., Bahr, A., Poggemann, D. W. & Hoffmann, J. Southward displacement of the North Atlantic subtropical gyre circulation system during North Atlantic cold spells. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018pa003376 (2019).
Nürnberg, D. et al. Western boundary current in relation to Atlantic Subtropical Gyre dynamics during abrupt glacial climate fluctuations. Glob. Planet. Change 201, 103497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103497 (2021).
Paterne, M. et al. Pulses of South Atlantic water into the tropical North Atlantic since 1825 from coral isotopes. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi1687. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi1687 (2023).
Kirchner, K., Rhein, M., Hüttl-Kabus, S. & Böning, C. W. On the spreading of South Atlantic water into the northern hemisphere. J. Geophys. Res. 114, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jc005165 (2009).
Gradone, J. C., Wilson, W., Glenn, S. & Miles, T. Upper ocean transport in the Anegada Passage from multi-year glider surveys. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 128, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jc019608 (2023).
Johns, W. E. et al. Towards two decades of Atlantic Ocean mass and heat transports at 26.5° N. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 381, 188. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0188 (2023).
Frajka-Williams, E. et al. Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: observed transport and variability. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00260 (2019).
Mertens, C., Rhein, M., Walter, M. & Kirchner, K. Modulation of the inflow into the Caribbean Sea by North Brazil Current rings. Deep Sea Res. Part I 56, 1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.03.002 (2009).
Rousset, C. & Beal, L. M. Observations of the Florida and Yucatan currents from a Caribbean cruise ship. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 1575–1581. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JPO4447.1 (2010).
Jury, M. R. Atmosphere-ocean processes governing inflow to the Northern Caribbean Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 11, 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11040718 (2023).
Yang, H. et al. Poleward shift of the major ocean gyres detected in a warming climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085868. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085868 (2020).
Qu, T., Zhang, L. & Schneider, N. North Atlantic subtropical underwater and its year-to-year variability in annual subduction rate during the Argo period. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 46, 1901–1916. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0246.1 (2016).
Liu, H., Yu, L. & Lin, X. Recent decadal change in the North Atlantic subtropical underwater associated with the poleward expansion of the surface salinity maximum. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 4433–4448. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014508 (2019).
Stevens, S. W., Johnson, R. J., Maze, G. & Bates, N. R. A recent decline in North Atlantic subtropical mode water formation. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0722-3 (2020).
Caesar, L., Rahmstorf, S., Robinson, A., Feulner, G. & Saba, V. Observed fingerprint of a weakening Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation. Nature 556, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0006-5 (2018).
Praetorius, S. K. North Atlantic circulation slows down. Nature 556, 180–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04086-4 (2018).
Thornalley, D. J. R. et al. Anomalously weak Labrador Sea convection and Atlantic overturning during the past 150 years. Nature 556, 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0007-4 (2018).
Ditlevsen, P. & Ditlevsen, S. Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Nat. Commun. 14, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39810-w (2023).
Johns, W. E. et al. Continuous, array-based estimates of Atlantic Ocean heat transport at 26.5°N. J. Clim. 24, 2429–2449. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3997.1 (2011).
Vellinga, M. & Wood, R. A. Global climatic impacts of a collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Clim. Change 54, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016168827653 (2002).
Kemp, L. et al. Climate endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2108146119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108146119 (2022).
Pörtner, H.-O. et al. (eds) IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2022).
Yan, X., Zhang, R. & Knutson, T. R. The role of Atlantic overturning circulation in the recent decline of Atlantic major hurricane frequency. Nat. Commun. 8, 1695. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01377-8 (2017).
Good, S. A., Martin, M. J. & Rayner, N. A. EN4: Quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses with uncertainty estimates. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 6704–6716. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009067 (2013).
Roemmich, D. et al. Unabated planetary warming and its ocean structure since 2006. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2513 (2015).
Todd, R. E. & Ren, A. S. Warming and lateral shift of the Gulf Stream from in situ observations since 2001. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01835-w (2023).
Wu, L. et al. Enhanced warming over the global subtropical western boundary currents. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1353 (2012).
Szuts, Z. B. & Meinen, C. S. Florida current salinity and salinity transport: Mean and decadal changes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 10495–410503. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl074538 (2017).
Curry, R., Dickson, B. & Yashayaev, I. A change in the freshwater balance of the Atlantic Ocean over the past four decades. Nature 426, 826–829. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02206 (2003).
Li, G. et al. Increasing ocean stratification over the past half-century. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1116–1123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00918-2 (2020).
Rudzin, J. E., Shay, L. K., Jaimes, B. & Brewster, J. K. Upper ocean observations in eastern Caribbean Sea reveal barrier layer within a warm core eddy. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 1057–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012339 (2017).
Balaguru, K. et al. Ocean barrier layers’ effect on tropical cyclone intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 14343–14347. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201364109 (2012).
Leipper, D. F. & Volgenau, D. Hurricane heat potential of the Gulf of Mexico. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 2, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1972)002%3c0218:HHPOTG%3e2.0.CO;2 (1972).
Ruddick, B. A practical indicator of the stability of the water column to double-diffusive activity. Deep Sea Res. Part A Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 30, 1105–1107 (1983).
Johnson, G. C., Schmidtko, S. & Lyman, J. M. Relative contributions of temperature and salinity to seasonal mixed layer density changes and horizontal density gradients. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 117, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007651 (2012).
Rousset, C. & Beal, L. M. Closing the transport budget of the Florida Straits. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2460–2466. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059498 (2014).
Trenberth, K. E. & Fasullo, J. T. Atlantic meridional heat transports computed from balancing Earth’s energy locally. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1919–1927. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072475 (2017).
Vaughan, D. G. et al. Recent rapid regional climate warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Clim. Change 60, 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026021217991 (2003).
Saba, V. S. et al. Enhanced warming of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean under climate change. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 121, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011346 (2016).
Seidov, D., Mishonov, A. & Parsons, R. Recent warming and decadal variability of Gulf of Maine and Slope Water. Limnol. Oceanogr. 66, 3472–3488. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11892 (2021).
Torres, R. R. & Tsimplis, M. N. Sea-level trends and interannual variability in the Caribbean Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 2934–2947. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20229 (2013).
Bustos Usta, D. F. & Torres Parra, R. R. Ocean and atmosphere changes in the Caribbean Sea during the twenty-first century using CMIP5 models. Ocean Dyn. 71, 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-021-01462-z (2021).
Ibrahim, H. D. & Sun, Y. Mechanism study of the 2010–2016 rapid rise of the Caribbean Sea Level. Glob. Planet. Change 191, 103219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103219 (2020).
Steinberg, J. M., Piecuch, C. G., Hamlington, B. D., Thompson, P. R. & Coats, S. Influence of deep-ocean warming on coastal sea-level decadal trends in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 129, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jc019681 (2024).
Domingues, R., Goni, G., Baringer, M. & Volkov, D. What caused the accelerated sea level changes along the U.S. East Coast during 2010–2015?. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 13367–313376. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081183 (2018).
Trenberth, K. E., Cheng, L., Jacobs, P., Zhang, Y. & Fasullo, J. Hurricane harvey links to ocean heat content and climate change adaptation. Earth’s Future 6, 730–744. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000825 (2018).
Lin, I. I., Goni, G. J., Knaff, J. A., Forbes, C. & Ali, M. M. Ocean heat content for tropical cyclone intensity forecasting and its impact on storm surge. Nat. Hazards 66, 1481–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0214-5 (2013).
Mainelli, M., DeMaria, M., Shay, L. K. & Goni, G. Application of oceanic heat content estimation to operational forecasting of recent Atlantic category 5 hurricanes. Weather Forecast. 23, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007WAF2006111.1 (2008).
Miles, T. N. et al. Ocean mixing during Hurricane Ida (2021): The impact of a freshwater barrier layer. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1224609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1224609 (2023).
Garner, A. J. Observed increases in North Atlantic tropical cyclone peak intensification rates. Sci. Rep. 13, 16299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42669-y (2023).
Balaguru, K., Foltz, G. R., Leung, L. R. & Emanuel, K. A. Global warming-induced upper-ocean freshening and the intensification of super typhoons. Nat. Commun. 7, 13670. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13670 (2016).
Jing, R. et al. Global population profile of tropical cyclone exposure from 2002 to 2019. Nature 626, 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06963-z (2024).
Bove, C. B., Mudge, L. & Bruno, J. F. A century of warming on Caribbean reefs. PLoS Clim. 1, e0000002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000002 (2022).
Fu, W., Randerson, J. T. & Moore, J. K. Climate change impacts on net primary production (NPP) and export production (EP) regulated by increasing stratification and phytoplankton community structure in the CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 13, 5151–5170. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5151-2016 (2016).
Boyce, D. G., Lewis, M. R. & Worm, B. Global phytoplankton decline over the past century. Nature 466, 591–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09268 (2010).
Hogikyan, A., Resplandy, L., Liu, M. & Vecchi, G. Hydrological cycle amplification reshapes warming-driven oxygen loss in the Atlantic Ocean. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01897-w (2024).
Glenn, E., Comarazamy, D., González, J. E. & Smith, T. Detection of recent regional sea surface temperature warming in the Caribbean and surrounding region. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6785–6792. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065002 (2015).
Servain, J., Caniaux, G., Kouadio, Y. K., McPhaden, M. J. & Araujo, M. Recent climatic trends in the tropical Atlantic. Clim. Dyn. 43, 3071–3089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2168-7 (2014).
Da-Allada, C. Y. et al. Seasonal mixed-layer salinity balance in the tropical Atlantic Ocean: Mean state and seasonal cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008357 (2013).
Zhang, D., Msadek, R., Mcphaden, M. J. & Delworth, T. Multidecadal variability of the North Brazil Current and its connection to the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. J. Geophys. Res. 116, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jc006812 (2011).
Stephenson, T. S. et al. Changes in extreme temperature and precipitation in the Caribbean region, 1961–2010. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 2957–2971. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3889 (2014).
Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3990.1 (2006).
Trenberth, K. E. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 47, 123–138 (2011).
Marvel, K. et al. Observed and projected changes to the precipitation annual cycle. J. Clim. 30, 4983–4995. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0572.1 (2017).
Boyer, T. P., Levitus, S., Antonov, J. I., Locarnini, R. A. & Garcia, H. E. Linear trends in salinity for the World Ocean, 1955–1998. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021791 (2005).
Durack, P. J., Wijffels, S. E. & Matear, R. J. Ocean salinities reveal strong global water cycle intensification during 1950 to 2000. Science 336, 455–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212222 (2012).
Cheng, L. et al. Improved estimates of changes in upper ocean salinity and the hydrological cycle. J. Clim. 33, 10357–10381. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0366.1 (2020).
Yu, L., Jin, X. & Liu, H. Poleward shift in ventilation of the North Atlantic subtropical underwater. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075772 (2018).
Hurrell, J. W. Decadal trends in the North Atlantic oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269, 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5224.676 (1995).
Montes, E. et al. Decadal variability in the oxygen inventory of North Atlantic subtropical underwater captured by sustained, long-term oceanographic time series observations. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycl. 30, 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005183 (2016).
Liu, H. & Qu, T. Production and fate of the South Atlantic subtropical underwater. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 125, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jc016309 (2020).
Chidichimo, M. P. et al. Energetic overturning flows, dynamic interocean exchanges, and ocean warming observed in the South Atlantic. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00644-x (2023).
Sugimoto, S., Hanawa, K., Watanabe, T., Suga, T. & Xie, S.-P. Enhanced warming of the subtropical mode water in the North Pacific and North Atlantic. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 656–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3371 (2017).
Blanke, B., Arhan, M., Lazar, A. & Prévost, G. A Lagrangian numerical investigation of the origins and fates of the salinity maximum water in the Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 107, 27-1–27-15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001318 (2002).
Spall, M. A. Cooling spirals and recirculation in the subtropical gyre. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 22, 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1992)022%3c0564:CSARIT%3e2.0.CO;2 (1992).
Berglund, S., Döös, K., Groeskamp, S. & McDougall, T. J. The downward spiralling nature of the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre. Nat. Commun. 13, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29607-8 (2022).
Burkholder, K. C. & Lozier, M. S. Subtropical to subpolar pathways in the North Atlantic: Deductions from Lagrangian trajectories. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 116, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006697 (2011).
Burkholder, K. C. & Lozier, M. S. Tracing the pathways of the upper limb of the North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 4254–4260. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060226 (2014).
Foukal, N. P. & Lozier, M. S. No inter-gyre pathway for sea-surface temperature anomalies in the North Atlantic. Nat. Commun. 7, 11333. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11333 (2016).
Rypina, I. I., Pratt, L. J. & Lozier, M. S. Near-surface transport pathways in the North Atlantic Ocean: Looking for throughput from the subtropical to the subpolar gyre. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 911–925. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JPO4498.1 (2011).
Brambilla, E. & Talley, L. D. Surface drifter exchange between the North Atlantic subtropical and subpolar gyres. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 111, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003146 (2006).
Palter, J. B. & Lozier, M. S. On the source of Gulf Stream nutrients. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 113, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004611 (2008).
Rahmstorf, S. On the freshwater forcing and transport of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Clim. Dyn. 12, 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050144 (1996).
Ganopolski, A. & Rahmstorf, S. Rapid changes of glacial climate simulated in a coupled climate model. Nature 409, 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/35051500 (2001).
Hu, A. et al. Dichotomy between freshwater and heat flux effects on oceanic conveyor belt stability and global climate. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00916-0 (2023).
Taylor, M. A., Stephenson, T. S., Chen, A. A. & Stephenson, K. A. Climate change and the Caribbean: Review and response. Caribb. Stud. 40, 169–200 (2012).
Gouretski, V. & Reseghetti, F. On depth and temperature biases in bathythermograph data: Development of a new correction scheme based on analysis of a global ocean database. Deep Sea Res. Part I 57, 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.011 (2010).
IOC, S. a. I. Tenth report of the join panel on oceanographic tables and standards (the practical salinity scale 1978 and the international equation of state of seawater 1980). UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science No. 36, 25 (1981).
IOC, S. a. I. The international thermodynamic equation of seawater—2010: Calculation and use of thermodynamic properties. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, Manuals and Guides No. 56, UNESCO (English), 196 (2010).
Gonçalves Neto, A., Langan, J. A. & Palter, J. B. Changes in the Gulf Stream preceded rapid warming of the Northwest Atlantic Shelf. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00143-5 (2021).
Simpson, J., Allen, C. & Morris, N. Fronts on the continental shelf. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 83, 4607–4614 (1978).
Jean-Michel, L. et al. The Copernicus global 1/12° oceanic and sea ice GLORYS12 reanalysis. Front. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.698876 (2021).
Large, W. G. & Yeager, S. G. The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set. Clim. Dyn. 33, 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3 (2009).
Arumí-Planas, C. et al. A multi-data set analysis of the freshwater transport by the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at nominally 34.5°S. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 129, 58. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC020558 (2024).
Malloy, R. Geomorphology and geologic structure: Straits of Florida. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81, 1947–1972 (1970).
McCarthy, G. D. et al. Measuring the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26°N. Prog. Oceanogr. 130, 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.10.006 (2015).
McDonagh, E. L. et al. Continuous estimate of Atlantic oceanic freshwater flux at 26.5°N. J. Clim. 28, 8888–8906. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00519.1 (2015).
Acknowledgements
J.C.G discloses support for the research of this work from the Department of Defense National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship. J.C.G., T.N.M., S.M.G., and W.D.W. disclose support for the research of this work from the G. Unger Vetlesen Foundation. T.N.M. and S.M.G. disclose support for the research of this work from Rutgers University. W.D.W. discloses support for the research of this work from VI-EPSCoR NSF award OIA# 1946412. J.B.P. discloses support for the research of this work from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Variability Program Project #0008287. We thank Rebecca Jackson, the editors, and three anonymous reviewers for their feedback regarding this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.G. performed the data analysis and visualization and wrote the main manuscript text. J.G., T.M. and J.P. contributed to the development of the methodology. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results, critical review, and approval of the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gradone, J.C., Miles, T.N., Palter, J.B. et al. Warming and salinity changes of the upper ocean Caribbean through-flow since 1960. Sci Rep 15, 23157 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05494-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05494-z