Table 3 Index scoring results and evaluation results.
From: Double weighted combat data quality evaluation method based on CVF optimized FAHP
Dataset | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 | M8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x1 | 96 | 90 | 76.5 | 88.2 | 82.3 | 78.6 | 83.6 | 91 |
x2 | 93.4 | 97.6 | 96.8 | 92.8 | 92.5 | 93.6 | 95.6 | 98.8 |
x3 | 82 | 100 | 100 | 86 | 98 | 92 | 100 | 100 |
x4 | 78.6 | 92.5 | 72.3 | 78.2 | 75.2 | 61.6 | 76 | 82.4 |
x5 | 88 | 95.4 | 76.8 | 73.8 | 42.6 | 84.6 | 92.1 | 95.4 |
x6 | 78 | 78.4 | 89.6 | 67.8 | 83.2 | 83.6 | 94.6 | 82.4 |
x7 | 86.2 | 92.4 | 93.4 | 73 | 98.6 | 88.6 | 77.8 | 82 |
x8 | 88.9 | 89.5 | 87.4 | 85.6 | 83.6 | 98.2 | 80.6 | 91.3 |
x9 | 86.8 | 78.8 | 92.4 | 84.6 | 85.2 | 82.2 | 95.5 | 76.6 |
Evaluation results | 49 | 86 | 72 | 41 | 53 | 27 | 91 | 78 |
