Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Changes in global fluvial sediment concentrations and fluxes between 1985 and 2020

An Author Correction to this article was published on 27 January 2025

This article has been updated

Abstract

Fluvial sediment transport, a key pathway for global biogeochemical cycling, has changed markedly in the Anthropocene. However, disaggregating the compound effects of anthropogenic stresses on fluvial sediment transport at the global scale remains a challenge. Here we map the suspended sediment concentrations for global river channels, based on satellite observations, between 1985 and 2020, and estimate long-term changes in land–ocean sediment transfer. We find significant (P < 0.05) changes in suspended sediment concentrations in 67.8% (3.2 × 105 km) of the examined river channel length, with 43.4% (2.05 × 105 km) displaying a significant increasing trend, driven mainly by rising rainfall erosion and climate warming. Consequently, a global net increase (+0.58 Gt year−1) in land–ocean sediment flux has been observed over the past four decades, despite sediment trapping by recently constructed dams, mostly in Asia. Our study provides a new baseline for source-to-sink fluvial transport in the Anthropocene that can inform global water resource management and delta management and protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Trends in SSC for global river reaches from 1985 to 2020.
Fig. 2: Changes in mean annual sediment flux for 416 major rivers across two periods (1985–2000 and 2011–2020).
Fig. 3: Drivers of the global trends in SSC and sediment flux.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The satellite-based dataset of global fluvial SSCs (GSED) is available via figshare at https://figshare.com/s/dde3bffd8e12227e2b26 (ref. 62). The field river SSCs can be accessed at https://gemstat.bafg.de/applications/, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9AEWTB9, https://www.mrcmekong.org/, https://hybam.obs-mip.fr and https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment.html. The GRWL dataset is available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1269594 (ref. 63). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The MATLAB code developed for the river SSC retrieval and statistics is available via figshare at https://figshare.com/s/dde3bffd8e12227e2b26 (ref. 62). The code for the BEAST algorithm is available at https://github.com/zhaokg/Rbeast.

Change history

References

  1. Walling, D. E. & Fang, D. Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world’s rivers. Glob. Planet. Change 39, 111–126 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Battin, T. J. et al. River ecosystem metabolism and carbon biogeochemistry in a changing world. Nature 613, 449–459 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hauer, C. et al. in Riverine Ecosystem Management: Science for Governing Towards a Sustainable Future (eds Schmutz, S. & Sendzimir, J.) 151–169 (Springer Open, 2018).

  4. Nienhuis, J. H. et al. Global-scale human impact on delta morphology has led to net land area gain. Nature 577, 514–518 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Syvitski, J. et al. Earth’s sediment cycle during the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 179–196 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moragoda, N. & Cohen, S. Climate-induced trends in global riverine water discharge and suspended sediment dynamics in the 21st century. Glob. Planet. Change 191, 103199 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Syvitski, J. P. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., Kettner, A. J. & Green, P. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308, 376–380 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, T. et al. Warming-driven erosion and sediment transport in cold regions. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 832–851 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Overeem, I. et al. Substantial export of suspended sediment to the global oceans from glacial erosion in Greenland. Nat. Geosci. 10, 859–863 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, D. et al. Exceptional increases in fluvial sediment fluxes in a warmer and wetter High Mountain Asia. Science 374, 599–603 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, K. E. et al. Extreme rainstorms drive exceptional organic carbon export from forested humid-tropical rivers in Puerto Rico. Nat. Commun. 13, 2058 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Restrepo, J. D., Kettner, A. J. & Syvitski, J. P. M. Recent deforestation causes rapid increase in river sediment load in the Colombian Andes. Anthropocene 10, 13–28 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Narayanan, A., Cohen, S. & Gardner, J. R. Riverine sediment response to deforestation in the Amazon basin. Earth Surf. Dyn. 12, 581–599 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, S. et al. Spatial trends and drivers of bedload and suspended sediment fluxes in global rivers. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR031583 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, L. et al. Global trends in water and sediment fluxes of the world’s large rivers. Sci. Bull. 65, 62–69 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kettner, A. J. & Syvitski, J. P. M. HydroTrend v.3.0: a climate-driven hydrological transport model that simulates discharge and sediment load leaving a river system. Comput. Geosci. 34, 1170–1183 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Syvitski, J. P. M. Supply and flux of sediment along hydrological pathways: research for the 21st century. Glob. Planet. Change 39, 1–11 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feng, D. et al. Recent changes to Arctic river discharge. Nat. Commun. 12, 6917 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Warrick, J. & Milliman, J. D. Do we know how much fluvial sediment reaches the sea? Decreased river monitoring of US coastal rivers. Hydrol. Process. 32, 3561–3567 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Park, E. Characterizing channel-floodplain connectivity using satellite altimetry: mechanism, hydrogeomorphic control, and sediment budget. Remote Sens. Environ. 243, 111783 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dethier, E. N., Renshaw, C. E. & Magilligan, F. J. Rapid changes to global river suspended sediment flux by humans. Science 376, 1447–1452 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Syvitski, J. P. M., Peckham, S. D., Hilberman, R. & Mulder, T. Predicting the terrestrial flux of sediment to the global ocean: a planetary perspective. Sediment. Geol. 162, 5–24 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yan, D. et al. A data set of global river networks and corresponding water resources zones divisions. Sci. Data 6, 219 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deal, E. et al. Grain shape effects in bed load sediment transport. Nature 613, 298–302 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, S. et al. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes. Nat. Geosci. 9, 38–41 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, S. L. et al. Downstream sedimentary and geomorphic impacts of the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River. Earth Sci. Rev. 138, 469–486 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Binh, D. V., Kantoush, S. & Sumi, T. Changes to long-term discharge and sediment loads in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta caused by upstream dams. Geomorphology 353, 107011 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Anthropogenic sediment retention: major global impact from registered river impoundments. Glob. Planet. Change 39, 169–190 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walling, D. & Webb, B. Erosion and sediment yield: a global overview. In Proc. International Association of Hydrological Sciences 3–20 (IAHS, 1996).

  30. Borrelli, P. et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 8, 2013 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, W., Zhou, T. & Zhang, L. Wetting and greening Tibetan Plateau in early summer in recent decades. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 5808–5822 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guan, Q. et al. Trends in river total suspended sediments driven by dams and soil erosion: a comparison between the Yangtze and Mekong rivers. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2022WR031979 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dethier, E. N., Renshaw, C. E. & Magilligan, F. J. Toward improved accuracy of remote sensing approaches for quantifying suspended sediment: implications for suspended-sediment monitoring. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 125, e2019JF005033 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Syvitski, J. P. M. Sediment discharge variability in Arctic rivers: implications for a warmer future. Polar Res. 21, 323–330 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bintanja, R. The impact of Arctic warming on increased rainfall. Sci. Rep. 8, 16001 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dethier, E. N., Sartain, S. L. & Lutz, D. A. Heightened levels and seasonal inversion of riverine suspended sediment in a tropical biodiversity hot spot due to artisanal gold mining. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23936–23941 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fagundes, H. O. et al. Human-induced changes in South American river sediment fluxes from 1984 to 2019. Water Resour. Res. 59, e2023WR034519 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bourgoin, L. M. et al. Temporal dynamics of water and sediment exchanges between the Curuaí floodplain and the Amazon River, Brazil. J. Hydrol. 335, 140–156 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li, T., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Fu, B. & Gao, D. Reversal of the sediment load increase in the Amazon basin influenced by divergent trends of sediment transport from the Solimões and Madeira Rivers. CATENA 195, 104804 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Karimaee Tabarestani, M. & Zarrati, A. R. Sediment transport during flood event: a review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 775–788 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Syvitski, J. P. M. et al. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat. Geosci. 2, 681–686 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Galy, V., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. & Eglinton, T. Global carbon export from the terrestrial biosphere controlled by erosion. Nature 521, 204–207 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Walling, D. E. et al. Storage of sediment-associated nutrients and contaminants in river channel and floodplain systems. Appl. Geochem. 18, 195–220 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu, X. et al. An empirical algorithm to seamlessly retrieve the concentration of suspended particulate matter from water color across ocean to turbid river mouths. Remote Sens. Environ. 235, 111491 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Doxaran, D., Froidefond, J.-M., Lavender, S. & Castaing, P. Spectral signature of highly turbid waters: application with SPOT data to quantify suspended particulate matter concentrations. Remote Sens. Environ. 81, 149–161 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Linke, S. et al. Global hydro-environmental sub-basin and river reach characteristics at high spatial resolution. Sci. Data 6, 283 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bulgarelli, B. & Zibordi, G. On the detectability of adjacency effects in ocean color remote sensing of mid-latitude coastal environments by SeaWiFS, MODIS-A, MERIS, OLCI, OLI and MSI. Remote Sens. Environ. 209, 423–438 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Allen, G. H. & Pavelsky, T. M. Global extent of rivers and streams. Science 361, 585–588 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540, 418–422 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Irish, R. R. in Landsat 7: Science Data Users Handbook 415–430 (NASA, 2000).

  52. Roy, D. P., Ju, J., Mbow, C., Frost, P. & Loveland, T. Accessing free Landsat data via the Internet: Africa’s challenge. Remote Sens. Lett. 1, 111–117 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dai, A. Dai and Trenberth Global River Flow and Continental Discharge Dataset (NCAR, 2017).

  54. Lehner, B. et al. in Global Reservoir and Dam Database, Version 1 (GRanDv1): Dams, Revision 01 (Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), 2011).

  55. Zhao, K. et al. Detecting change-point, trend, and seasonality in satellite time series data to track abrupt changes and nonlinear dynamics: a Bayesian ensemble algorithm. Remote Sens. Environ. 232, 111181 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Latrubesse, E. M. et al. Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. Nature 546, 363–369 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Moragoda, N. et al. Modeling and analysis of sediment trapping efficiency of large dams using remote sensing. Water Resour. Res. 59, e2022WR033296 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Renard, K. G. Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: a Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) (United States Government Printing, 1997).

  59. Liu, Y., Zhao, W., Liu, Y. & Pereira, P. Global rainfall erosivity changes between 1980 and 2017 based on an erosivity model using daily precipitation data. CATENA 194, 104768 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sankarasubramanian, A., Vogel, R. M. & Limbrunner, J. F. Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States. Water Resour. Res. 37, 1771–1781 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Funk, C. et al. The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci. Data 2, 150066 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sun, X. & Feng, L. Global river sediment dataset 1985–2020. figshare https://figshare.com/s/dde3bffd8e12227e2b26 (2024).

  63. Allen, G. H. & Pavelsky T. M. Global River Widths from Landsat (GRWL) Database. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1269594 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the United States Geological Survey for providing the global Landsat satellite images, and Google Earth for providing data processing resources. L.F. was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42425604 and 42321004) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2022YFC3201802). L.T. was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFB3905304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42371336 and 42271354) and LIESMARS Special Research Funding. E.P. was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its Academic Research Fund (Tier2: MOE-T2EP50222-0007; Tier3: MOE-T32022-0006), the Earth Observatory of Singapore (EOS) via its funding from the National Research Foundation Singapore, the Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centers of Excellence initiative, and the EOS contribution no. 608. C.Z. and X.S. were supported by a grant from the Ningbo Municipal Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.S. and L.T. contributed to the methodology, data processing and analyses, and writing. L.F. conceptualized the project and contributed to the methodology, funding acquisition, supervision and writing. H.F., D.E.W., L.H., E.P., D.L. and C.Z. participated in interpreting the results and refining the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lian Feng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Xiaolong Yu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Development and validation of the SSC retrieval algorithm.

(a) Spatial distributions of satellite-field monitoring matching pairs from common river water bodies (n = 491) and dark-clear waters (n = 237), which were used to develop the SSC retrieval algorithm. Samples from dark-clear waters are primarily located in Northern Europe, especially in Scandinavian rivers, as well as in northern North America. (b) Spectral shapes of satellite reflectance. (c) Validation of the SSC retrieval algorithm. (d) Comparison of long-term trends between Landsat-derived SSC and field-measured SSC, with orange stars in panel (a) indicating the locations of the 66 field sites. (e) The validity of the SSC trends derived using an observational frequency of 8 images per year (that is, the cutoff for reliable Landsat SSC trends used in this study).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Global patterns of satellite-derived fluvial SSC.

(a) The number of valid Landsat observations during 1985-2020 for global river reaches. River reaches with less than 288 observations (that is, 8 observations per year on average) were excluded, providing a mean annual number of observations of 14.7 per year (see histogram within the panel) (b) Long-term annual mean SSC of global rivers.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Satellite images (RGB true colors) showing the effect of dams in trapping fluvial suspended sediment.

The arrow indicates the flow direction and dam ___location.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Dam impoundment time indicated by satellite-derived SSC time series and the BEAST algorithm.

(a) Detected impoundment year (red lines) for three dams: the Wanjiazhai Dam on the Yellow River, China; the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River, China; and the Avrig Dam on the Olt River, Romania. The gray shadings represent the construction periods of these dams. (b) Comparison of BEAST-detected dam impoundment years with the GRanD recorded construction years, where the heights and SSC trapping efficiencies of the dams are demonstrated. (c) The spatial distribution of continuously impounding dams after 1985, with the impoundment year color-coded.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Global patterns of the rainfall erosivity factor (R) and the land cover and management factor (C).

(a-b) Global mean values for R and C between 1985 and 2020; (c-d) Global trends (that is, Sen’s Slope) for R and C over the same period (Mann-Kendall test, P < 0.05).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Climate elasticity models for 40 river basins where SSC is sensitive (P < 0.05) to change in precipitation.

dSSC/SSC and dR/R represent the relative changes in annual SSC and the rainfall erosivity factor over a river basin, compared to their long-term mean values. The linear regression coefficient, namely the climate elasticity (e), represents the proportional SSC increase in response to a 1% increase in rainfall erosivity. The gray-shaded area denotes the 95% confidence interval of the best-fit line. The locations of the river basins are shown in Fig. 3b.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Sensitivity of SSC to temperature change in the high latitudes and the Tibetan Plateau indicated by climate elasticity models.

dSSC/SSC and dT represent the changes in annual SSC and annual mean air temperature, compared to their long-term mean values (see Methods). The linear regression coefficient, namely the climate elasticity (e), represents the percentage change of SSC in response to an increase in air temperature by 1 °C. The gray-shaded area denotes the 95% confidence interval of the best-fit line. The locations of the river basins are shown in Fig. 3b.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Global pattern of river sediment flux (Qs) changes between two periods, 1985-2000 and 2011-2020.

(a) Results from this study, (b) Results of Dethier’s data, and (c) Latitudinal variations of Qs change.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods 1–4, Figs. 1–6 and References.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Source images.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Source images.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Tian, L., Fang, H. et al. Changes in global fluvial sediment concentrations and fluxes between 1985 and 2020. Nat Sustain 8, 142–151 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01476-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01476-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene