Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Catalytic proton exchange in water distillation for efficient tritiated water clean-up

Abstract

Tritiated water emissions from nuclear facilities pose significant environmental risks and threaten the sustainability of nuclear energy. However, deep detritiation remains a major challenge due to the nearly indistinguishable physicochemical properties among water isotopologues. Here we present an efficient hydrogen isotope separation process based on catalytic proton exchange. The unique catalysis-promoted proton-transfer pathway found in a metal–organic framework (MIL-101(Cr)) significantly lowers the isotope exchange energy barrier to a previously unachieved level. Incorporating MIL-101(Cr) into a water distillation (WD) system enables a solid–liquid–gas triphasic mass transfer that overcomes the thermodynamic constraints of traditional WD, which relies on a liquid–gas biphasic isotope exchange. The height equivalent to the theoretical plate of the established WD prototype fell by half compared to the existing WD systems, thus increasing the separation efficiency by over four orders of magnitude in a 10-m distillation tower. This work offers an industrially viable and scalable option for cleaning up tritiated water.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of gas–liquid–solid isotope exchange in WD.
Fig. 2: Theoretical calculations for isotope exchange in MIL-101(Cr).
Fig. 3: Evidence of isotope exchange in MIL-101(Cr).
Fig. 4: Coupling CPE with WD for cleaning up tritiated water.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information. Further information and answers to questions about the data and modelling approach are available from the corresponding author on request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Johnston, W. M. et al. Tritium in nature. Science 113, 1–2 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nie, B. et al. Anthropogenic tritium: inventory, discharge, environmental behavior and health effects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 135, 110188 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobson, R. L. & Cooper, M. F. Tritium toxicity: effect of low-level 3HOH exposure on developing female germ-cells in mouse. Radiat. Res. 58, 91–100 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, J., Marks, N. & Irwin, T. The risks of radioactive waste water release. Science 382, 31–33 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagnaire, B. et al. Effects of in situ exposure to tritiated natural environments: a multi-biomarker approach using the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Sci. Total Environ. 599–600, 597–611 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arcanjo, C. et al. Insights into the modes of action of tritium on the early-life stages of zebrafish, Danio rerio, using transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. J. Environ. Radioact. 261, 107141 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Lombo, M. S. et al. Tritiated thymidine induces developmental delay, oxidative stress and gene overexpression in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat. Toxicol. 265, 106766 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Lombo, M. S. et al. Tritiated thymidine internalization in zebrafish early life stages: joint use of experimental procedures and microdosimetry. Radiat. Res. 199, 373–384 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, D. et al. Implications of Fukushima’s radioactive water discharge on global environmental sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 3061–3064 (2024).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bondareva, L. et al. Tritium: doses and responses of aquatic living organisms (model experiments). Environments 9, 51 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dingwall, S. et al. Human health and the biological effects of tritium in drinking water: prudent policy through science – Addressing the ODWAC new recommendation. Dose-Response 9, 6–31 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. IAEA Management of Waste Containing Tritium and Carbon-14 (IAEA, 2004).

  13. Shere, L. et al. The next generation of low tritium hydrogen isotope separation technologies for future fusion power plants. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 55, 319–338 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, M. et al. Barely porous organic cages for hydrogen isotope separation. Science 366, 613–620 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, A. I. Heavy water: a manufacturers’ guide for the hydrogen century. Can. Nucl. Soc. Bull. 22, 1–14 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oh, H. & Hirscher, M. Quantum sieving for separation of hydrogen isotopes using MOFs. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 27, 4278–4289 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lozada-Hidalgo, M. et al. Scalable and efficient separation of hydrogen isotopes using graphene-based electrochemical pumping. Nat. Commun. 8, 15215 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Magomedbekov, E. P. et al. Water distillation as a method of detritiation of heavy-water moderator. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 51, 384–391 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Horita, J. et al. in Aqueous Systems at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures (eds Palmer, D. A. et al.) 277–319 (Elsevier, 2004).

  20. Price, A. H. Vapour pressure of tritiated water. Nature 181, 262 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ceriotti, M. et al. Nuclear quantum effects in water and aqueous systems: experiment, theory, and current challenges. Chem. Rev. 116, 7529–7550 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao, X. et al. Hydrophilic modification of packings for water distillation and its mass transfer performance. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 157, 108130 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fu, X. et al. Superhydrophilic metal-organic frameworks film modified surface for tritium removal from tritiated heavy water. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 348, 112387 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, J. et al. A 3D extra-large-pore zeolite enabled by 1D-to-3D topotactic condensation of a chain silicate. Science 379, 283–287 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanikel, N. et al. Evolution of water structures in metal-organic frameworks for improved atmospheric water harvesting. Science 374, 454–457 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Agmon, N. The Grotthuss mechanism. Chem. Phys. Lett. 244, 456–462 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, X. et al. Diffusion-free Grotthuss topochemistry for high-rate and long-life proton batteries. Nat. Energy 4, 123–130 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eriksson, U. K. et al. Subangstrom resolution X-ray structure details aquaporin-water interactions. Science 340, 1346–1349 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rae, H. K. in Separation of Hydrogen Isotopes (ed. Rae, H. K.) 1–26 (ACS Publications, 1978).

  30. Zorainy, M. Y. et al. Revisiting the MIL-101 metal–organic framework: design, synthesis, modifications, advances, and recent applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 22159–22217 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Férey, G. et al. A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science 309, 2040–2042 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leus, K. et al. Systematic study of the chemical and hydrothermal stability of selected ‘stable’ metal organic frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 226, 110–116 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang, J. et al. Macroscopic heterostructure membrane of graphene oxide/porous graphene/graphene oxide for selective separation of deuterium water from natural water. Adv. Mater. 34, e2206524 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Su, Y. et al. Separating water isotopologues using diffusion-regulatory porous materials. Nature 611, 289–294 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng, Z. et al. High-yield, green and scalable methods for producing MOF-303 for water harvesting from desert air. Nat. Protoc. 18, 136–156 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao, T. et al. High-yield, fluoride-free and large-scale synthesis of MIL-101(Cr). Dalton Trans. 44, 16791–16801 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cavka, J. H. et al. A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13850–13851 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chui, S. S. et al. A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu3(TMA)2(H2O)3]n. Science 283, 1148–1150 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nordfors, D. et al. Isotopic effects in XPS spectra of H2O and D2O. J. Phys. Colloq. 48, C9-789-C789-792 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, W. et al. Insights into the interaction between immobilized biocatalysts and metal-organic frameworks: a case study of PCN-333. JACS Au 1, 2172–2181 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Čendak, T. et al. Indomethacin embedded into MIL-101 frameworks: a solid-state NMR study. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 6140–6150 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor, J. M. et al. Facile proton conduction via ordered water molecules in a phosphonate metal-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 14055–14057 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Seifrid, M. et al. Insight into the structures and dynamics of organic semiconductors through solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 910–930 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Miho, Y. et al. Tritium water distillation assisted with adsorption and isotopic exchange. Fusion Sci. Technol. 71, 326–332 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Li, S. et al. Tuning the morphology and adsorption capacity of Al-MIL-101 analogues with Fe3+ for phosphorus removal from water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 560, 321–329 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jin, Y. et al. Modular construction of an MIL-101(Fe)@MIL-100(Fe) dual-compartment nanoreactor and its boosted photocatalytic activity toward tetracycline. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 48285–48295 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, Z. et al. Green synthesis of MIL-100(Fe) derivatives and revealing their structure-activity relationship for 2,4-dichlorophenol photodegradation. Chemosphere 291, 132950 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee, H. et al. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318, 426–430 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Frisch, M. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A. 02 (Gaussian, 2004).

  50. Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Grimme, S. et al. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rassolov, V. A. et al. 6-31G* basis set for atoms K through Zn. J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1223–1229 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Frisch, M. J. et al. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian-basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3265–3269 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Clark, T. et al. Efficient diffuse function-augmented basis sets for anion calculations. III. The 3-21+G basis set for first-row elements, Li–F. J. Comput. Chem. 4, 294–301 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Raghavachari, K. et al. Highly correlated systems: excitation-energies of 1st row transition-metals Sc-Cu. J. Chem. Phys. 91, 1062–1065 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tomasi, J. et al. Molecular interactions in solution: an overview of methods based on continuous distributions of the solvent. Chem. Rev. 94, 2027–2094 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Delley, B. et al. An all-electron numerical-method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 92, 508–517 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Delley, B. et al. From molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7756–7764 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Fei, S. et al. Analysis of the water adsorption mechanism in metal–organic framework MIL-101(Cr) by molecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 26755–26769 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the support from the following funding sources: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 22425061 to S.W., 22276132 to H.L., 22206144 to L.C., 22406135 to T.W., 22125602 and 22076078 to L.M. and 22306139 to A.J.), the National Natural Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFE0105300 to S.W.), the New Cornerstone Science Foundation through the Xplorer Prize, a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZC 20231888 to T.W.). We also thank C. Zhang from Anhui University of Science and Technology for his help with the theoretical calculations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.W. conceived and supervised the project. H.L., Q.Y. and S.Z. completed the experiments and collected and analysed the data. N.L. and X.D. contributed to the theoretical calculations. L.C. was involved in data analysis and writing of the paper. J.S. analysed the ssNMR data. T.W., N.S., J.X., J.L., L.H., A.J., Z.X., G.Z., C.G., H.Y., J.C., L.M., S.G., K.L., P.L., X.L., X.O., Y.P., X.Z. and Z.C. participated in project discussions and provided valuable insights. All authors contributed to refining the paper before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuao Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.W., H.L., Q.Y., S.Z., A.J., T.W. and J.L. and Soochow University have filed a patent based on the results presented. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Zhan Li, Ken-ichi Otake and Sheng Zhang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The PDF file includes supplementary materials, namely text, Supplementary Figs. 1–46, Tables 1–3 and References 1–34.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

H/D exchange path for MIL-101(Al). As MIL-101(Al) and MIL-101(Cr) are isomorphic systems, the spin complexity of the Cr atoms needs to be considered. Thus, MIL-101(Al) was chosen as the simulation object to speed up the calculations. The kinetic simulation of proton transfer in the water bridge of MIL-101(Al) shows that a stable structure of three H2O molecules can be formed between Al–OH2 and Al–OH−. Protons are repeatedly transferred back and forth in the hydrogen bonding lattice of this water bridge to realize the H/D exchange process, which is very rapid. The ultrafast exchange rate was at the femtosecond level. The kinetic results show that the proton exchange process was fast and frequent at 350 K. Colour code: Al, purple; O, red; C, grey; H, white.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3

Water vapour adsorption data, ssNMR processing data, etc.

Source Data Fig. 4

Tritium WD data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Yang, Q., Luan, N. et al. Catalytic proton exchange in water distillation for efficient tritiated water clean-up. Nat Sustain 8, 553–561 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01537-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01537-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing