Abstract
Nucleocapsid protein (N), or nucleoprotein (NP) coats the genome of most RNA viruses, protecting and shielding RNA from cytosolic RNAases and innate immune sensors, and plays a key role in virion biogenesis and viral RNA transcription. Often one of the most highly expressed viral gene products, N induces strong antibody (Ab) and T cell responses. N from different viruses is present on the infected cell surface in copy numbers ranging from tens of thousands to millions per cell, and it can be released to bind to uninfected cells. Surface N is targeted by Abs, which can contribute to viral clearance via Fc-mediated cellular cytotoxicity. Surface N can modulate host immunity by sequestering chemokines (CHKs), extending prior findings that surface N interferes with innate and adaptive immunity. In this review, we consider aspects of surface N cell biology and immunology and describe its potential as a target for anti-viral intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The host immune response drives the evolution of viral immunoevasion mechanisms. Large DNA viruses such as herpesviruses and poxviruses encode the best-known and most obvious immunomodulatory proteins. These include interferon (IFN) antagonists, homologs of host cytokines, CHKs and their receptors, and inhibitors of antigen presentation1,2. This diverse arsenal is enabled by a large genome. Indeed, more than 50% of their genome can encode such accessory genes, i.e., genes not required for productive replication3,4,5.
RNA viruses face the same adversaries (e.g., us) but with a much smaller genomic palette (typically 10 to 30 kB) that precludes wholesale capture of host genes for evolutionary remodeling, a favorite trick of large DNA viruses. This puts a premium on multi-tasking both at the level of coding (overlapping genes) and proteins (multifunctionality). Almost all negative and positive strand RNA viruses encode a protein that binds genomic RNA, typically termed N or NP (HIV “gag” is an exception). N’s canonical function is binding nascent genomic RNA genome through electrostatic interactions, packing them into long helical ribonucleoprotein complexes and participating in virion assembly. Despite major sequence and structural differences, N proteins from different RNA virus families have been reported to regulate innate and adaptive immunity by suppressing IFN, modulating cytokine production, apoptosis, autophagy, and stress granule formation6,7,8. Thus, N proteins play multiple roles in viral evolution, contributing to viral replication and immune evasion.
N proteins lack ER-insertion sequences. Their absence of N-linked glycans added in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (though are glycosylated when mistargeted to the ER)9,10, confirms their absence from the secretory pathway. Despite this, N protein cell surface expression, detected by antibody (Ab) binding to live cells more than 40 years ago, has proven to be the rule rather than the exception among RNA viruses (Fig. 1, Table 1), including (in order of discovery) influenza A virus (IAV)11,12, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)13, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV)14,15, human (HIV), simian (SIV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)16,17,18, mouse hepatitis coronavirus (MHV)19,20, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)21, and measles virus (MV)22,23.
Given the typical high anti-N Ab response during infections, surface N is an obvious target of Ab-based adaptive immunity (complement lysis, Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and Ab-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP). Less obvious is surface N manipulation of innate immunity, first reported 20 years ago for MV N as contributing to MV-induced inflammation by inhibiting IL-12 secretion22,23. Later, surface RSV N expression was reported to impair CD4 T cell immunological synapse formation21. We reported that SARS-CoV-2 N is secreted during infection, binding to the surface of infected cells and non-infected neighboring cells, inhibiting CHK-mediated leukocyte chemotaxis, and enabling activation of Fc-mediated Ab effector functions24. Recently, we extended these findings to the human coronavirus (HCoV)-OC43 N protein25, suggesting that cell surface N generally contributes to CoV innate immunoevasion.
Large DNA viruses share evolutionary conserved mechanisms to evade immune detection and destruction. One is the secretion of viral proteins that interfere with the cytokine network. These include cytokine homologs, cytokine-receptor homologs, and viral cytokine binding proteins26,27,28. The growing list of surface N proteins (Table 1) suggests RNA viruses might employ an alternative common strategy of using extracellular N to similarly influence innate immunity. Here, we summarize and review current knowledge on surface RNA virus N proteins and their established and potential roles in immunoevasion.
Summary of studies demonstrating cell surface N expression
Using polyclonal (p)Abs, IAV N was the first N reported to be present on the surface of infected cells11 and has been the most intensively studied cell surface N among the different viruses (Table I). Surface N expression was definitively established using monoclonal (m)Abs12, a finding confirmed by several laboratories. Passively transferred N pAbs can reduce IAV pathogenesis and IAV replication in mice32,37,38. Although anti-N mAbs enable complement-mediated lysis in vitro12, in vivo activity of anti-N pAbs is FcγR-mediated and dependent on CD8+ T cells38. As anti-N mAbs also mediate ADCP32, the extent to which anti-N-based protection is based on Ab interaction with cell surface N (ADCC and complement-mediated lysis) vs. N in fragmented virions is uncertain (enhanced phagocytosis leading to increased T cell activation). As with IAV N Abs, passive transfer of LCMV N-specific Abs significantly decreased viral titers in infected mice15. The in vivo anti-viral activity of LCMV N-specific mAbs was independent of C3 or FcγR, begging explanation.
HIV, SIV, and FIV encode three structural genes (gag, pol, and env), common to all known replicative retroviruses. Once translated, the gag polyprotein is proteolytically divided into four major domains: p17 (matrix), p24 (capsid), p7 (N protein), and p6. Although there are no reports of gag p7 (N) cell surface expression, both p17 and p24 have been detected on the surface of persistently HIV-infected cells by immunofluorescence (IF) and radioimmunoassay with mAbs16,17. These authors later extended these findings to SIV and FIV gag p24 using mAbs18, consistent with gag cell surface expression being a feature of lentivirus infection.
MHV N protein was detected on the surface of infected cells using IF with mAbs as well as mAb-mediated complement lysis of infected cells. Adoptively transferred mAbs protected mice against lethal MHC infection19,20.
Additional biological activities of cell surface N from IAV, VSV, LCMV, HIV, SIV, FIV, and MHV remain to be discovered.
Cell surface N-mediated immunosuppression
RSV
RSV N is expressed on the surface of infected cells, including mouse DCs, detected with mAbs by flow cytometry (FC) and IF 24 h post-infection (hpi)21. N is detected as early as 1 hpi with either infectious or inactivated virus, demonstrating that surface N derives from the inoculum and not endogenously synthesized protein. By 24 h post-infection, endogenously synthesized N increases the N surface signal. N is released by infected cells, possibly due to secretion by the classical ER to Golgi complex (GC) pathway, but the evidence for this conclusion is limited to marginal co-colocalization with the GC by IF and partial effects of brefeldin A secretion blockade. Soluble recombinant N binds cells, consistent with released N binding accounting for N cell surface expression.
Adding soluble N to DCs or artificial MHC class II bearing membranes impairs their ability to present peptides to naïve CD4 T cells. N did not colocalize with MHC-loaded peptides on artificial membranes but colocalized with TCRs and even induced TCR clustering on T cells, suggesting its interaction with one or more components of the TCR micro cluster complex on the T cell surface, which contains CD2, CD3, CD4, CD28 in addition to the TC. Whether RSV N can also inhibit the activation of CD8 T cells remains unexplored. The relevance of N interference with T cells in vivo remains to be established. This will be difficult, particularly since RSV infection of human CD4 and CD8 T cells39 likely contributes to RSV-associated defects in T cell responses.
MV
The immunosuppressive properties of MV N were discovered by adding recombinant N to mouse and human B cells. This revealed N binding to FcγRII on the surface of B cells, as shown by 90% inhibition using anti-FcγRII mAbs and the ability of FcγRII gene expression to confer N binding to FcγRII negative cells. N binding to B cells reduced immunoglobulin synthesis of activated human B lymphocytes by 50%35,36.
Extending these findings, MV N expressed by human thymic epithelial cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes infected with wild-type or vaccine strains was detected on the cell surface with mAbs by FC and IF22,23. Newly synthesized N enters the late endocytic compartment via an unknown mechanism. N remains in endosomes if cells lack FcγRII (e.g., T cells). If FcγRII is present, it associates with N and delivers N to the plasma membrane, where it can dissociate and bind FcγRII on non-infected neighboring cells by cell-to-cell contact and cell-free diffusion. N cell surface expression is independent of other viral genes, as it is observed in FcγRII positive cells expressing N from a transgene.
Biologically active N can also be released from dead and dying MV-infected cells and bind other cell surface proteins expressed by human, monkey, and mouse cells. Binding to human T cells requires T cell activation and blocks further proliferation22. Binding of N to human thymic epithelial cells induces calcium influx and causes G0/G1 cell cycle arrest22. Both cell-derived and recombinant N inhibit IL-12 secretion by human and mouse macrophages. Injecting N or cells expressing a transgene encoding N inhibits mouse ear swelling in an IL-12-dependent allergen model23. MV N also binds to the B cell receptor, i.e., cell surface immunoglobulin, inhibiting immunoglobulin synthesis35,36.
As with N from other viruses, gauging the in vivo importance of N-based immunosuppression is complicated by the many other effects induced by other viral proteins40.
HCoV
We found that SARS-CoV-2 N is localized on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 infected and transiently transfected Vero, BHK-21, Caco-2, Calu-3, CHO-K1, HEK293-FT cells, with mAbs by IF, FC and ADCC reporter assays24. Surface N, as expected, is a target for ADCC24,25,41. More recently, we reported that N from the common cold HCoV-OC43 is robustly expressed on the surface of infected cell lines by the same criteria25. Pooled human airway epithelial cell cultures infected with SARS-CoV-2 or HCoV-OC43 demonstrated significant levels of cell surface N after 72 hpi by FC with mAbs, showing the relevance of surface N expression to conditions approximating human airway infections. As natural N is not glycosylated (unlike artificially ER-targeted N), surface expression does not entail classical ER to GC export.
We detected surface N on both infected cells and non-infected neighboring cells24. N, like all N proteins, is highly positively charged, and binding of endogenous N and cell-derived or recombinant N to cells requires heparan sulfate/heparin (highly negatively charged proteoglycan), as shown by the abrogation of binding by enzymatic or genetic removal of heparan sulfate/heparin. Consistent with this finding, N binds to heparin/heparin sulfate with nanomolar affinity but no other sulfated glycosaminoglycans, and cell binding is blocked by polybrene, a cationic polymer that neutralizes cell surface electrostatic charge24,25. N produced by SARS-CoV-2-infected cells is transferred through 3 μm filters to non-infected cells, demonstrating that cell contact is unnecessary. Levels are much higher, however, in co-cultured cells, consistent with parallel and likely more robust transfer by cell contact.
The presence of N in serum within the first few weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection suggests the physiological relevance of released N42,43,44. The extent to which N detected in these assays is free vs. present in ribonucleoproteins, virions, or exosomes remains to be determined45. Given the ubiquitous expression of heparan sulfate/heparin on cells, including endothelial cells, it seems unlikely that sufficient N is released by infected cells to saturate available cell surfaces. In extending these findings, Wu et al.46 reported that N derived from the Omicron variant binds more weakly to the plasma membrane. They identified STEAP2, a likely non-glycosylated cell surface protein, as a co-receptor in the cell lines tested. RNASeq, however, indicates that STEAP2 mRNA is present at low levels in all human tissues except prostate, inconsistent with STEAP2 being a normal N receptor. In any event, transiently expressed N was reported to mediate RNA and DNA transport to recipient neighboring cells through STEAP2-mediated endocytosis, achieving gene expression in the recipient cells, suggesting another function for N46.
Among all SARS-CoV-2 structural (spike, membrane, envelope and N) and accessory proteins (ORFs 3a, 3b, 6, 7a, 7b, 8, 9b, 9c, and 10) screened for interaction against 64 human cytokines by bio-layer interferometry, only N bound 11 CHKs (CCL5, CCL11, CCL21, CCL26, CCL28, CXCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL12β, and CXCL14) with micromolar to nanomolar affinity24. HCoV-OC43 N binds with high affinity to the same set of 11 CHKs as SARS-CoV-2 N, but also to an exclusive set of 6 additional cytokines (CCL13, CCL20, CCL25, CXCL12α, CXCL13, and IL27)25.
In silico modeling of interaction with HADDOCK and AlphaFold2-Multimer software between SARS-CoV-2 N and CXCL12β reveals a high specificity of docking47. SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-OC43 N proteins inhibited in vitro CXCL12β-mediated leukocyte migration in chemotaxis assays. Exogenous recombinant N from highly pathogenic (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV) and common cold HCoV (HKU1, NL63, and 229E) also inhibited in vitro CXCL12β-mediated leukocyte migration. Notably, despite this conserved function, the sequence homology between HCoV N proteins can be considerably low even within the same viral genus (38% between SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-OC43)48,49.
Given the large number of CHKs bound by HCoV N, it will be difficult to gauge their impact in animal models by targeted CHK gene knockout or Ab-mediated interference.
Concluding remarks
N is typically among the most abundant viral proteins expressed during RNA virus infection. Based on the increasing evidence, N expression on the surface of RNA virus-infected cells is likely to be the rule rather than the exception. There is limited evidence supporting in vivo N surface expression. SARS-CoV-2 N has been detected in lung, intestine, and kidney biopsies from fatal and recovered COVID-19 patients without signs of viral replication50,51,52, consistent with its presence on the cell surfaces. Further, high levels of free SARS-CoV-2 N in the blood and urine of patients correlates with severe disease53,54,55. In vivo N cell surface expression is a critical question for future studies. There is no evidence that N reaches the cell surface via the standard ER to GC secretory pathway; the evidence suggests that N is secreted through a non-canonical secretory pathway56, like HIV-Tat protein57,58. Several cellular proteins non-canonically exported to the cell surface (e.g., FGF2, tau) bind proteoglycans such as heparan sulfate, which have been shown to mediate the secretion of these proteins to the extracellular compartment59,60. This is an obvious starting point for studying the secretion of HCoV N, given its binding to heparin/heparin sulfate. More generally, N protein membrane penetration may be typical of proteins with highly positively charged domains. Cationic proteins (e.g., Tat) penetrate cells and can confer cell penetration when appended to proteins. Anti-DNA Abs have long been known to penetrate living cells and traffic to the nucleus61, a charge-dependent process requiring a cationic Ab antigen binding site and cell surface proteoglycans62.
Given their common binding to RNA via positively charged domains, it is likely that many, if not all, or nearly all viral N proteins will, like the HCoV N proteins studied, bind to cell surface proteoglycans. Other secreted viral proteins also bind to the cell surface of infected or adjacent cells through proteoglycans. These include innate immune immunosuppressive factors such as herpes simplex virus 2 glycoprotein gG63, myxoma virus T1 protein64, ectromelia virus E163 protein65, vaccinia virus B18 protein66, and molluscum contagiosum virus MC54L protein67.
N proteins are highly immunogenic, inducing rapid and robust IgG response. IgG Abs against IAV N protein promote viral clearance in mice by mechanisms involving both Fc receptors and CD8 + T lymphocytes38, consistent with a contribution from ADCC of viral infected cells and possibly Ab-enhanced DCs cross-presentation of N containing viral debris to activate CD8 + T cells. Anti-N Abs have been shown to improve control of SARS-CoV-2 in mice and hamsters68,69,70. We and others reported HCoVs N as a target for Fc-mediated Ab effector functions, since anti-N Abs trigger infected cell activation of NK cell24,25,41.
The strong immunogenicity and antigenic stability of N make it an attractive candidate for vaccines aiming for broad coverage against closely related viruses. A combination of spike+N mRNA (ancestral SARS-CoV-2 sequence, Wuhan-Hu-1) vaccination induced more robust control of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants in the lungs than spike mRNA alone, and reduced viral load in the upper respiratory tract in preclinical models70. An N-based vaccine against IAV elicited significant humoral and cellular NP-specific immune responses and reported to provide an 84% level of protection against PCR-confirmed symptomatic influenza compared to placebo in a phase 2 clinical trial71. Similar results have been reported for a SARS-CoV-2 N-based vaccine in hamsters, generating strong and broad-spectrum N immune responses across multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants72.
While the most obvious benefit of N-based vaccines is the induction of CD8+ and CD4 + T cell responses, it will be important to assess the contribution of anti-N Abs to viral clearance and protection. As with all human virus protection studies, this will not be an easy task, as the contribution of even CD8 + T cells to protection against acute viral infections remains to be firmly established. It will be equally difficult to establish the role of N proteins in modulating anti-viral immunity, though clues may be offered, ironically, in characterizing human immune responses to N vs. viral-receptor-protein-based vaccines by analyzing serum and cell immune signatures. Other clues to the evolutionary importance of N CHK-binding may come from mutational studies that identify residues critical for binding, enabling experiments to determine the fitness of such mutants in animals with various immune defects and resulting evolutionary changes in the mutants.
Although surface N protein expression was discovered nearly 50 years ago, research has been highly sporadic, with only a few dozen studies reported to date. Hopefully, the intense worldwide interest to better understand HCoV immunity, in particular, and viral immunity, in general, will fuel interest in the role of N proteins in viral immunity and immune evasion, leading to developing N based vaccines and possibly even therapeutics.
References
Alcami, A. & Koszinowski, U. H. Viral mechanisms of immune evasion. Mol. Med. Today 6, 365–372 (2000).
Alcami, A. Viral mimicry of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 36–50 (2003).
Heidarieh, H., Hernaez, B. & Alcami, A. Immune modulation by virus-encoded secreted chemokine binding proteins. Virus Res. 209, 67–75 (2015).
Pontejo, S. M. & Murphy, P. M. Chemokines encoded by herpesviruses. J. Leukoc. Biol. 102, 1199–1217 (2017).
Pontejo, S. M., Murphy, P. M. & Pease, J. E. Chemokine subversion by human herpesviruses. J. Innate Immun. 10, 465–478 (2018).
Ding, B., Qin, Y. & Chen, M. Nucleocapsid proteins: roles beyond viral RNA packaging. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 7, 213–226 (2016).
Liu, Y. et al. A comparative analysis of coronavirus nucleocapsid (N) proteins reveals the SADS-CoV N protein antagonizes IFN-β production by inducing ubiquitination of RIG-I. Front Immunol. 12, 688758 (2021).
Wong, L. R. & Perlman, S. Immune dysregulation and immunopathology induced by SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses - are we our own worst enemy? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 47–56 (2022).
Bacik, I. et al. Introduction of a glycosylation site into a secreted protein provides evidence for an alternative antigen processing pathway: transport of precursors of major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted peptides from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol. J. Exp. Med. 186, 479–487 (1997).
Supekar, N. T. et al. Variable post-translational modifications of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Glycobiology, https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwab044 (2021).
Virelizier, J. L., Allison, A. C., Oxford, J. S. & Schild, G. C. Early presence of ribonucleoprotein antigen on surface of influenza virus-infected cells. Nature 266, 52–54 (1977).
Yewdell, J. W., Frank, E. & Gerhard, W. Expression of influenza A virus internal antigens on the surface of infected P815 cells. J. Immunol. 126, 1814–1819 (1981).
Yewdell, J. W. et al. Recognition of cloned vesicular stomatitis virus internal and external gene products by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 163, 1529–1538 (1986).
Zeller, W., Bruns, M. & Lehmann-Grube, F. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. X. Demonstration of nucleoprotein on the surface of infected cells. Virology 162, 90–97 (1988).
Straub, T. et al. Nucleoprotein-specific nonneutralizing antibodies speed up LCMV elimination independently of complement and FcγR. Eur. J. Immunol. 43, 2338–2348 (2013).
Ikuta, K. et al. Expression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gag antigens on the surface of a cell line persistently infected with HIV-1 that highly expresses HIV-1 antigens. Virology 170, 408–417 (1989).
Dennin, R. H. & Beyer, A. Application of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and microbead techniques to study the localization of p24 and p18 antigens of HIV-1 on the surface of HIV-1-infected H9-lymphocytes. J. Microsc. 164, 53–60 (1991).
Nishino, Y. et al. Major core proteins, p24s, of human, simian, and feline immunodeficiency viruses are partly expressed on the surface of the virus-infected cells. Vaccine 10, 677–683 (1992).
Nakanaga, K., Yamanouchi, K. & Fujiwara, K. Protective effect of monoclonal antibodies on lethal mouse hepatitis virus infection in mice. J. Virol. 59, 168–171 (1986).
Lecomte, J. et al. Protection from mouse hepatitis virus type 3-induced acute disease by an anti-nucleoprotein monoclonal antibody. Arch. Virol. 97, 123–130 (1987).
Céspedes, P. F. et al. Surface expression of the hRSV nucleoprotein impairs immunological synapse formation with T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3214–E3223 (2014).
Laine, D. et al. Measles virus (MV) nucleoprotein binds to a novel cell surface receptor distinct from FcγRII via Its C-terminal ___domain: role in MV-induced immunosuppression. J. Virol. 77, 11332–11346 (2003).
Marie, J. C. et al. Cell surface delivery of the measles virus nucleoprotein: a viral strategy to induce immunosuppression. J. Virol. 78, 11952–11961 (2004).
López-Muñoz, A. D., Kosik, I., Holly, J. & Yewdell, J. W. Cell surface SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein modulates innate and adaptive immunity. Sci. Adv. 8, eabp9770 (2022).
López-Muñoz, A. D., Santos, J. J. S. & Yewdell, J. W. Cell surface nucleocapsid protein expression: a betacoronavirus immunomodulatory strategy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2304087120 (2023).
Gonzalez-Motos, V., Kropp, K. A. & Viejo-Borbolla, A. Chemokine binding proteins: an immunomodulatory strategy going viral. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 30, 71–80 (2016).
Hernaez, B. & Alcami, A. New insights into the immunomodulatory properties of poxvirus cytokine decoy receptors at the cell surface. F1000Res, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14238.1 (2018).
Hernaez, B. & Alcamí, A. Virus-encoded cytokine and chemokine decoy receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 66, 50–56 (2020).
Tamminen, W. L., Wraith, D. & Barber, B. H. Searching for MHC-restricted anti-viral antibodies: antibodies recognizing the nucleoprotein of influenza virus dominate the serological response of C57BL/6 mice to syngeneic influenza-infected cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 17, 999–1006 (1987).
Stitz, L. et al. Characterization and immunological properties of influenza A virus nucleoprotein (NP): cell-associated NP isolated from infected cells or viral NP expressed by vaccinia recombinant virus do not confer protection. J. Gen. Virol. 71, 1169–1179 (1990).
Prokudina, E. N. & Semenova, N. P. Localization of the influenza virus nucleoprotein: cell-associated and extracellular non-virion forms. J. Gen. Virol. 72, 1699–1702 (1991).
Rijnink, W. F. et al. Characterization of non-neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies that target the M1 and NP of influenza A viruses. J. Virol. 97, e01646–01622 (2023).
Staerz, U. D., Yewdell, J. W. & Bevan, M. J. Hybrid antibody-mediated lysis of virus-infected cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 17, 571–574 (1987).
Fernie, B. F., Ford, E. C. & Gerin, J. L. The development of Balb/c cells persistently infected with respiratory syncytial virus: presence of ribonucleoprotein on the cell surface. Proc Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 167, 83–86 (1981).
Graves, M. et al. Development of antibody to measles virus polypeptides during complicated and uncomplicated measles virus infections. J. Virol. 49, 409–412 (1984).
Ravanel, K. et al. Measles virus nucleocapsid protein binds to FcgammaRII and inhibits human B cell antibody production. J. Exp. Med. 186, 269–278 (1997).
Carragher, D. M., Kaminski, D. A., Moquin, A., Hartson, L. & Randall, T. D. A novel role for non-neutralizing antibodies against nucleoprotein in facilitating resistance to influenza virus. J. Immunol. 181, 4168–4176 (2008).
LaMere, M. W. et al. Contributions of antinucleoprotein IgG to heterosubtypic immunity against influenza virus. J. Immunol. 186, 4331–4339 (2011).
Agac, A. et al. Host responses to respiratory syncytial virus infection. Viruses 15, 1999 (2023).
Griffin, D. E. Measles immunity and immunosuppression. Curr. Opin. Virol. 46, 9–14 (2021).
Fielding, C. A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 host-shutoff impacts innate NK cell functions, but antibody-dependent NK activity is strongly activated through non-spike antibodies. eLife 11, e74489 (2022).
Favresse, J., Bayart, J. L., David, C., Dogné, J. M. & Douxfils, J. Nucleocapsid serum antigen determination in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients using the single molecule array technology and prediction of disease severity. J. Infect. 84, e4–e6 (2022).
Olea, B. et al. SARS-CoV-2 N-antigenemia in critically ill adult COVID-19 patients: frequency and association with inflammatory and tissue-damage biomarkers. J. Med Virol. 94, 222–228 (2022).
Yokoyama, R. et al. Association of the serum levels of the nucleocapsid antigen of SARS-CoV-2 with the diagnosis, disease severity, and antibody titers in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Front. Microbiol. 12, 791489 (2021).
Troyer, Z. et al. Extracellular vesicles carry SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and serve as decoys for neutralizing antibodies. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10, e12112 (2021).
Wu, J. L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 N protein mediates intercellular nucleic acid dispersion, a feature reduced in Omicron. iScience 26, 105995 (2023).
Tomezsko P. J., Ford C. T., Meyer A. E., Michaleas A. M. & Jaimes R. 3rd. Human cytokine and coronavirus nucleocapsid protein interactivity using large-scale virtual screens. Front. Bioinform. 4, 1397968 (2024).
Zhang, B. et al. Comparing the nucleocapsid proteins of human coronaviruses: structure, immunoregulation, vaccine, and targeted drug. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 761173 (2022).
Kang, S. et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein RNA binding ___domain reveals potential unique drug targeting sites. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10, 1228–1238 (2020).
Grootemaat, A. E. et al. Lipid and nucleocapsid N-protein accumulation in COVID-19 patient lung and infected cells. Microbiol Spectr. 10, e0127121 (2022).
Gaebler, C. et al. Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Nature 591, 639–644 (2021).
Grootemaat, A. E. et al. Nucleocapsid protein accumulates in renal tubular epithelium of a post-COVID-19 patient. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, e0302923 (2023).
Wick, K. D. et al. Plasma SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen levels are associated with progression to severe disease in hospitalized COVID-19. Crit. Care 26, 278 (2022).
Rogers, A. J. et al. The association of baseline plasma SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen level and outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Ann. Intern. Med. 175, 1401–1410 (2022).
Tampe, D. et al. Urinary levels of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein associate with risk of AKI and COVID-19 severity: a single-center observational study. Front. Med. 8, 644715 (2021).
Sparn, C., Meyer, A., Saleppico, R. & Nickel, W. Unconventional secretion mediated by direct protein self-translocation across the plasma membranes of mammalian cells. Trends Biochem. Sci. 47, 699–709 (2022).
Zeitler, M., Steringer, J. P., Müller, H.-M., Mayer, M. P. & Nickel, W. HIV-Tat protein forms phosphoinositide-dependent membrane pores implicated in unconventional protein secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 21976–21984 (2015).
Agostini, S. et al. Inhibition of non canonical HIV-1 tat secretion through the cellular Na+,K+-ATPase blocks HIV-1 infection. EBioMedicine 21, 170–181 (2017).
Zehe, C., Engling, A., Wegehingel, S., Schäfer, T. & Nickel, W. Cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans are essential components of the unconventional export machinery of FGF-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15479–15484 (2006).
Katsinelos, T. et al. Unconventional secretion mediates the trans-cellular spreading of tau. Cell Rep. 23, 2039–2055 (2018).
Tan, E. & Kunkel, H. An immunofluorescent study of the skin lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatism. 9, 37–46 (1966).
Park, H. et al. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) function as endocytic receptors for an internalizing anti-nucleic acid antibody. Sci. Rep. 7, 14373 (2017).
Martinez-Martin, N. et al. Herpes simplex virus enhances chemokine function through modulation of receptor trafficking and oligomerization. Nat. Commun. 6, 6163 (2015).
Seet, B. T. et al. Glycosaminoglycan binding properties of the myxoma virus CC-chemokine inhibitor, M-T1. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 30504–30513 (2001).
Ruiz-Argüello, M. B. et al. An ectromelia virus protein that interacts with chemokines through their glycosaminoglycan binding ___domain. J. Virol. 82, 917–926 (2008).
Montanuy, I., Alejo, A. & Alcami, A. Glycosaminoglycans mediate retention of the poxvirus type I interferon binding protein at the cell surface to locally block interferon antiviral responses. FASEB J. 25, 1960–1971 (2011).
Xiang, Y. & Moss, B. Molluscum contagiosum virus interleukin-18 (IL-18) binding protein is secreted as a full-length form that binds cell surface glycosaminoglycans through the C-terminal tail and a furin-cleaved form with only the IL-18 binding ___domain. J. Virol. 77, 2623–2630 (2003).
Dangi, T. et al. Improved control of SARS-CoV-2 by treatment with a nucleocapsid-specific monoclonal antibody. J. Clin. Investig. 132, e162282 (2022).
Dangi, T., Class, J., Palacio, N., Richner, J. M. & Penaloza MacMaster, P. Combining spike- and nucleocapsid-based vaccines improves distal control of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Rep. 36, 109664 (2021).
Hajnik, R. L. et al. Dual spike and nucleocapsid mRNA vaccination confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants in preclinical models. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabq1945 (2022).
Leroux-Roels, I. et al. Immunogenicity, safety, and preliminary efficacy evaluation of OVX836, a nucleoprotein-based universal influenza A vaccine candidate: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 23, 1360–1369 (2023).
Primard, C. et al. OVX033, a nucleocapsid-based vaccine candidate, provides broad-spectrum protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants in a hamster challenge model. Front Immunol. 14, 1188605 (2023).
Acknowledgements
The authors are supported by the Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.D.L-M. and J.W.Y. wrote and reviewed the manuscript. A.D.L-M. prepared the figure. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
López-Muñoz, A.D., Yewdell, J.W. Cell surface RNA virus nucleocapsid proteins: a viral strategy for immunosuppression?. npj Viruses 2, 41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44298-024-00051-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44298-024-00051-3