Table 4 Comparative results of benchmark functions.
From: Scheduling optimization of ship plane block flow line considering dual resource constraints
DE | WOA | PSO | GWO | IGWO | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Std | Mean | Std | Mean | Std | Mean | Std | Mean | Std |
2.6E-12 | 2.8E-12 | 1.6E–177 | 0.0E+00 | 2.4E–10 | 4.6E–10 | 1.3E–71 | 2.2E–69 | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 |
4.1E–08 | 7.5E–09 | 3.2E–114 | 8.4E–112 | 7.6E–03 | 2.1E–02 | 1.0E–41 | 4.2E–41 | 3.6E–188 | 0.0E+00 |
2.4E+04 | 1.0E+03 | 3.7E+03 | 6.0E+03 | 4.9E+00 | 2.4E+00 | 6.8E–21 | 6.2E–21 | 3.6E–185 | 0.0E+00 |
2.2E+00 | 1.9E–01 | 2.4E+01 | 2.1E+01 | 2.2E–01 | 9.5E–02 | 1.4E–17 | 2.0E–17 | 7.3E–138 | 1.2E–137 |
3.5E+01 | 1.5E+00 | 2.7E+01 | 7.3E–02 | 2.3E+01 | 1.8E+00 | 2.8E+01 | 7.9E–01 | 2.6E+01 | 7.0E–01 |
4.4E–03 | 8.8E–04 | 5.4E–05 | 1.8E–03 | 8.2E–04 | 6.0E–04 | 2.3E–04 | 8.9E–05 | 4.1E–05 | 9.9E–06 |
– 1.3E+04 | 4.6E+00 | – 1.3E+04 | 7.2E+02 | – 5.7E+03 | 5.2E+02 | – 3.1E+03 | 1.1E+03 | – 6.9E+03 | 2.2E+02 |
4.8E+01 | 5.8E+00 | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 | 6.5E+01 | 9.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 |
4.0E–15 | 0.0E+00 | 7.6E–15 | 2.3E–15 | 4.0E–15 | 1.4E–15 | 4.0E–15 | 0.0E+00 | 4.4E–16 | 0.0E+00 |
0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 | 1.4E–01 | 9.4E–02 | 1.4E–01 | 5.3E–02 | 3.3E–02 | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 |
