Table 6 Instrumental-variable quantile treatment effects on SoC score and RWB score, coefficient (standardized error).
From: Sense of community and residential well-being among rural-urban migrants in China
| Â | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
SoC score | RWB score | SoC score | RWB score | |
Hukou status | 7.02 (7.70) | 7.40*** (2.65) | Â | Â |
Home ownership |  |  | −4.39 (5.46) | 2.69 (6.10) |
Age | 0.21 (0.14) | 0.00 (0.06) | 0.27 (0.55) | 0.04 (0.49) |
Number of housing facilities | −0.65 (0.69) | −1.12** (0.47) | −0.44* (0.25) | −0.88** (0.42) |
Household monthly income | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00* (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00** (0.00) |
Number of bedrooms | −0.88** (0.42) | −1.23*** (0.33) | −0.25 (0.92) | 0.65 (1.20) |
Number of living rooms | −0.83 (2.37) | 2.12 (1.76) | 0.29 (4.10) | 4.96 (6.90) |
Number of problem-solving channels | 2.47 (1.81) | 2.20** (0.93) | 1.92* (1.15) | 1.62 (1.79) |
Gender | 3.26 (25.13) | −0.09 (2.44) | 1.28 (7.39) | −1.22 (5.18) |
Marital status | −0.43 (2.97) | 2.60 (1.83) | −0.32 (12.74) | 1.34 (9.23) |
Educational attainment | −3.05 (3.67) | −4.50** (1.78) | 0.00 (8.61) | 0.21 (11.85) |
Converted residences | 2.20 (5.23) | −3.85* (2.22) | 4.69 (9.61) | 1.09 (7.16) |
Constant | 24.84 (17.28) | 41.55 (6.75) | 22.52* (13.50) | 30.02*** (11.28) |
Observations | 698 | 695 | 698 | 695 |
