Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

DARLIN mouse for in vivo lineage tracing at high efficiency and clonal diversity

Abstract

Lineage tracing is a powerful tool to study cell history and cell dynamics during tissue development and homeostasis. An increasingly popular approach for lineage tracing is to generate high-frequent mutations at given genomic loci, which can serve as genetic barcodes to label different cell lineages. However, current lineage tracing mouse models suffer from low barcode diversity and limited single-cell lineage coverage. We recently developed the DARLIN mouse model by incorporating three barcoding arrays within defined genomic loci and combining Cas9 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) to improve editing diversity in each barcode array. We estimated that DARLIN generates 1018 distinct lineage barcodes in theory, and enables the recovery of lineage barcodes in over 70% of cells in single-cell assays. In addition, DARLIN can be induced with doxycycline to generate stable lineage barcodes across different tissues at a defined stage. Here we provide a step-by-step protocol on applying the DARLIN system for in vivo lineage tracing, including barcode induction, estimation of induction efficiency, barcode analysis with bulk and single-cell sequencing, and computational analysis. The execution time of this protocol is ~1 week for experimental data collection and ~1 d for running the computational analysis pipeline. To execute this protocol, one should be familiar with sequencing library generation and Linux operation. DARLIN opens the door to study the lineage relationships and the underlying molecular regulations across various tissues at physiological context.

Key points

  • The DARLIN mouse enables the study of the cell lineages of millions of cells and at a high efficiency in vivo.

  • Compared with other lineage-tracing mouse models, which can suffer from low barcode diversity and limited single-cell lineage coverage, the DARLIN mouse incorporates three barcoding arrays within defined genomic loci and combines Cas9 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase to improve editing diversity in each barcode array.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: DARLIN mouse barcoding system.
Fig. 2: Schematic of mouse line genetics and the generation of DARLIN.
Fig. 3: General considerations for lineage tracing experiments.
Fig. 4: Representative agarose gel image of edited DARLIN array.
Fig. 5: Representative TapeStation results of bulk DARLIN libraries.
Fig. 6: DARLIN data analysis.
Fig. 7: Clone identification from partial barcode measurements in the three genomic loci in DARLIN.
Fig. 8: A representative QC report from the Results.txt file after data processing.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw and intermediate data associated with this tutorial can be obtained in https://zenodo.org/records/11929508.

Code availability

The snakemake_DARLIN package for DARLIN data processing is available at https://github.com/ShouWenWang-Lab/snakemake_DARLIN. The companion Python package for downstream analysis is available at https://github.com/ShouWenWang-Lab/MosaicLineage. A tutorial for downstream analyses written in jupyter notebooks can be found at https://github.com/ShouWenWang-Lab/DARLIN_tutorial.

References

  1. Kretzschmar, K. & Watt, F. M. Lineage tracing. Cell 148, 33–45 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bałakier, H. & Pedersen, R. A. Allocation of cells to inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages in preimplantation mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 90, 352–362 (1982).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He, L. et al. Enhancing the precision of genetic lineage tracing using dual recombinases. Nat. Med. 23, 1488–1498 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, K. et al. Tracing the origin of alveolar stem cells in lung repair and regeneration. Cell 187, 2428–2445.e20 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. He, L. et al. Proliferation tracing reveals regional hepatocyte generation in liver homeostasis and repair. Science 371, eabc4346 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McKenna, A. et al. Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing. Science 353, aaf7907 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Raj, B. et al. Simultaneous single-cell profiling of lineages and cell types in the vertebrate brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 442–450 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Spanjaard, B. et al. Simultaneous lineage tracing and cell-type identification using CRISPR–Cas9-induced genetic scars. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 469–473 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Alemany, A., Florescu, M., Baron, C. S., Peterson-Maduro, J. & van Oudenaarden, A. Whole-organism clone tracing using single-cell sequencing. Nature 556, 108–112 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan, M. M. et al. Molecular recording of mammalian embryogenesis. Nature 570, 77–82 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalhor, R. et al. Developmental barcoding of whole mouse via homing CRISPR. Science 361, eaat9804 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pei, W. et al. Polylox barcoding reveals haematopoietic stem cell fates realized in vivo. Nature 548, 456–460 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, J. et al. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature 514, 322–327 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pei, W. et al. Resolving fates and single-cell transcriptomes of hematopoietic stem cell clones by PolyloxExpress barcoding. Cell Stem Cell 27, 383–395.e8 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber, T. S. et al. LoxCode in vivo barcoding resolves epiblast clonal fate to fetal organs. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.02.522501 (2023).

  17. Xie, L. et al. Comprehensive spatiotemporal mapping of single-cell lineages in developing mouse brain by CRISPR-based barcoding. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01947-3 (2023).

  18. Liu, K. et al. Mapping single-cell-resolution cell phylogeny reveals cell population dynamics during organ development. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01325-x (2021).

  19. Bowling, S. et al. An engineered CRISPR–Cas9 mouse line for simultaneous readout of lineage histories and gene expression profiles in single cells. Cell 181, 1410–1422.e27 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, L. et al. A mouse model with high clonal barcode diversity for joint lineage, transcriptomic, and epigenomic profiling in single cells. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.019 (2023).

  21. Wang, S.-W., Herriges, M. J., Hurley, K., Kotton, D. N. & Klein, A. M. CoSpar identifies early cell fate biases from single-cell transcriptomic and lineage information. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01209-1 (2022).

  22. Wang, K. et al. PhyloVelo enhances transcriptomic velocity field mapping using monotonically expressed genes. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01887-5 (2023).

  23. Jones, M. G. et al. Inference of single-cell phylogenies from lineage tracing data using Cassiopeia. Genome Biol. 21, 92 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Schiffman, J. S. et al. Defining heritability, plasticity, and transition dynamics of cellular phenotypes in somatic evolution. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01920-6 (2024).

  25. Patel, S. H. et al. Lifelong multilineage contribution by embryonic-born blood progenitors. Nature 606, 747–753 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdullah, L. et al. Hierarchal single-cell lineage tracing reveals differential fate commitment of CD8 T-cell clones in response to acute infection. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.21.586160 (2024).

  27. Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A. E. et al. Single-cell lineage tracing unveils a role for TCF15 in haematopoiesis. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2503-6 (2020).

  28. Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A. E. et al. Clonal analysis of lineage fate in native haematopoiesis. Nature 553, 212–216 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinreb, C., Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A., Camargo, F. D. & Klein, A. M. Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation. Science 367, eaaw3381 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Weng, C. et al. Deciphering cell states and genealogies of human hematopoiesis. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07066-z (2024).

  31. Engblom, C. et al. Spatial transcriptomics of B cell and T cell receptors reveals lymphocyte clonal dynamics. Science 382, eadf8486 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, A. et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell 185, 1777–1792.e21 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rao, A., Barkley, D., França, G. S. & Yanai, I. Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature 596, 211–220 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tian, L., Chen, F. & Macosko, E. Z. The expanding vistas of spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 773–782 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Beard, C., Hochedlinger, K., Plath, K., Wutz, A. & Jaenisch, R. Efficient method to generate single-copy transgenic mice by site-specific integration in embryonic stem cells. Genesis 44, 23–28 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank F. Garcia Osorio for his work on developing the Cas9–CARLIN model and initial barcode amplification protocols. L.L. would like to thank H. Wu, a former research assistant in her laboratory, for plotting the schematic genetics of DARLIN mouse. S.-W.W. would like to thank M. Chen, a PhD student in his laboratory, for formatting this manuscript. S.-W.W. acknowledges support from Westlake High-Performance Computing Center. L.L. is supported by National Key Research and Development Project of China (2024YFA1306603). L.L. and S.-W.W. acknowledge support from ‘Pioneer’ and ‘Leading Goose’ R&D Programs of Zhejiang province (2024SSYS0034 and 2024SSYS0034). S.B. acknowledges support from the NIH (grant number 1K99HL164969). S.-W.W. acknowledges support from the NSFC (32470700). F.D.C. is funded by grants R01HL128850, RC2DK131963 and R01HL158192, and an Alex Lemonade Crazy 8 award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This protocol is based on a paper by L.L., S.B., S.-W.W. and F.D.C., where L.L. and S.B. developed the DARLIN model with input from F.D.C., and S.-W.W. developed and carried out computational analyses. Here, S.-W.W., L.L. and S.B. wrote the manuscript. H.L. helped to develop the analyses tutorial and generated Figs. 3 and 7 with supervision from S.-W.W.; and D.C. generated Figs. 2, 4 and 5 with supervision from L.L.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shou-Wen Wang or Fernando D. Camargo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Zheng Hu, Bushra Raj and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key references

Li, L. et al. Cell 186, 5183–5199.e22 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.019

Bowling, S. et al. Cell 181, 1410–1422.e27 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.048

Patel, S. H. et al. Nature 606, 747–753 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04804-z

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Bowling, S., Lin, H. et al. DARLIN mouse for in vivo lineage tracing at high efficiency and clonal diversity. Nat Protoc (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-025-01141-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-025-01141-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research