Fig. 4: Novelty impairs or improves IA-LTM during reconsolidation depending on its proximity to the reactivation session.
From: Modulation of memory reconsolidation by adjacent novel tasks: timing defines the nature of change
Top: experimental design. Figures show latency to step-down from the platform during training (Tr) and test session, expressed as mean ± SEM. R: animals submitted to a reactivation session. NR: animals not submitted to a reactivation session. a: ***p < 0.001 vs all groups, multiple comparisons after Welch’s ANOVA (n = 10–11); W(5, 26.72) = 18.22. b: ***p < 0.001 vs Tr and +++p < 0.001 vs R + F, multiple comparisons after Welch’s ANOVA (n = 11–14); W(3, 22.1) = 663.3.
