Fig. 4: Differential CD69 and CD103 expressions defined silicotic CD4+ TRM cells into effector or regulatory TRM cells. | Communications Biology

Fig. 4: Differential CD69 and CD103 expressions defined silicotic CD4+ TRM cells into effector or regulatory TRM cells.

From: Crystalline silica-induced recruitment and immuno-imbalance of CD4+ tissue resident memory T cells promote silicosis progression

Fig. 4

a Flow plot indicated CD4+ TRM cells in fibrotic lungs were divided into four subsets by CD69 and CD103 expressions. CD69+CD103+ (Red); CD69+CD103– (Blue); CD69–CD103+ (Orange); CD69–CD103– (Green). b–d Flow histogram displayed transcriptional factor T-bet (b), ROR-γt (c), and GATA-3 (d) expressions among different subsets. Bar graph below shows the MFI among the indicated CD4+ TRM cell subsets. e Flow histogram compared ratios of FOXP3+ among different subpopulations. Bar graph below reveals the percentages of FOXP3+ among the indicated subsets. f FC heatmaps show the expression intensity of each marker. Representative flow histogram compared the intensity of CD25, PD-1, ST2, ICOS, and CD39 among four subsets in CD4+ TRM cells. g Typical flow plots showed CD69 and CD103 expressing patterns on Tregs (FOXP3+) or Teff cells (FOXP3–) in CD4+ TRM cells. h Typical flow plots demonstrated CD69 and CD103 expressing patterns on T-bet+, ROR-γt+, or GATA-3+ subsets in CD4+ TRM cells. i The bar graph showed the ratios of CD103+ against CD103– subsets in CD69+ CD4+ TRM cells. Bar graphs are the combined results of at least three independent experiments. Individual mice are plotted on the graphs, n = 5–6 biologically independent animals. Values are reported as the mean ± SD. P value is determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.

Back to article page